0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Turbomachinery

Multidisciplinary Design and Optimizations of Swept and Leaned Transonic Rotor

[+] Author and Article Information
Seyed Reza Razavi

Quality System Engineering Department,
Concordia University,
1455 De Maisonneuve Boulevard West,
Montreal, QC H3G 1M8, Canada
e-mail: s_raz@encs.concordia.ca

Shervin Sammak

Center for Research Computing,
University of Pittsburgh,
3700 Ohara Street,
Pittsburgh, PA 15261
e-mail: shervin.sammak@pitt.edu

Masoud Boroomand

Department of Aerospace Engineering,
Tehran Polytechnic,
424 Hafez Avenue,
Tehran 15875-4413, Iran
e-mail: boromand@aut.ac.ir

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Turbomachinery Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received April 30, 2017; final manuscript received May 30, 2017; published online August 23, 2017. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 139(12), 122601 (Aug 23, 2017) (11 pages) Paper No: GTP-17-1155; doi: 10.1115/1.4037456 History: Received April 30, 2017; Revised May 30, 2017

Optimization problems in many engineering applications are usually considered as complex subjects. Researchers are often obliged to solve a multi-objective optimization problem. Several methodologies such as genetic algorithm (GA) and artificial neural network (ANN) are proposed to optimize multi-objective optimization problems. In the present study, various levels of sweep and lean were exerted to blades of an existing transonic rotor, the well-known NASA rotor-67. Afterward, an ANN optimization method was used to find the most appropriate settings to achieve the maximum stage pressure ratio, efficiency, and operating range. At first, the study of the impact of sweep and lean on aerodynamic and performance parameters of the transonic axial flow compressor rotors was undertaken using a systematic step-by-step procedure. This was done by employing a three-dimensional (3D) compressible turbulent model. The results were then used as the input data to the optimization computer code. It was found that the optimized sweep angles can increase the safe operating range up to 30% and simultaneously increase the pressure ratio and subsequently the efficiency by 1% and 2%. Moreover, it was found that the optimized leaned blades, according to their target function, had positive (forward (FW)) or negative (backward (BW)) optimized angles. Leaning the blade at the optimum point can increase the safe operating range up to 12% and simultaneously increase the pressure ratio and subsequently the efficiency by 4% and 5%.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Jeong, H. , Utomo, T. , Ji, M. , Lee, Y. , Lee, G. , and Chung, H. , 2009, “ CFD Analysis of Flow Phenomena Inside Thermo Vapor Compressor Influenced by Operating Conditions and Converging Duct Angles,” J. Mech. Sci. Technol., 23(9), pp. 2366–2375. [CrossRef]
Bliss, D. B. , 1976, “ Method of and Apparatus for Preventing Leading Edge Shocks and Shock-Related Noise in Transonic and Supersonic Rotor Blades and the Like,” Bolt Beranek and Newman, Inc., Cambridge, MA, U.S. Patent No. US3989406 A. http://www.google.co.in/patents/US3989406
Rabe, D. , Hoying, D. , and Koff, S. , 1991, “ Application of Sweep to Improve the Efficiency of a Transonic Fan—Part II: Performance and Laser Test Results,” AIAA Paper No. 91-2544.
Hah, C. , Puterbaugh, S. L. , and Wadia, A. R. , 1999, “ Control of Shock Structure and Secondary Flow Field Inside Transonic Compressor Rotor Through Aerodynamic Sweep,” ASME Paper No. 98-GT-561.
Xing, X. Q. , Zhou, S. , and Zhao, X. L. , 2001, “ Probing Into the Connotation of Sweep Aerodynamics of Transonic Fans and Compressors,” ASME Paper No. 2001-GT-0352.
Honger, M. , Engber, M. , and Bergner, J. , 2004, “ Impact of Transonic Compressor Rotor Leading Edge Shape on Shock Structure Near the Casing,” Symposium on Transport Phenomena and Dynamics of Rotating Machinary (ISROMAC), Honolulu, HI, Mar. 7–11, p. 10.
Gummer, V. , and Wenger, U. , 2001, “ Using Sweep and Dihedral to Control Three-Dimensional Flow in Transonic Stators of Axial Compressor,” ASME J. Turbomach., 123(1), pp. 40–48. [CrossRef]
Ernesto, B. , and Roberto, B. , 2007, “ Aerodynamics of Swept and Leaned Transonic Compressor-Rotors,” Appl. Energy, 84(10), pp. 1012–1027. [CrossRef]
Chen, N. X. , Zhang, H. W. , and Huang, W. G. , 2010, “ Aerodynamic Sweeping Study and Design for Transonic Compressor Rotor Blades,” J. Therm. Sci., 19(4), pp. 295–299. [CrossRef]
Yang, L. , Hua, O. , and Zhao-Hui, D. , 2007, “ Optimization Design and Experimental Study of Low-Pressure Axial Fan With Forward-Skewed Blades,” Int. J. Rotating Mach., 2007, p. 85275. [CrossRef]
Oyama, A. , Liou, M. S. , and Obayashi, S. , 2002, “ Transonic Axial-Flow Blade Shape Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithm and Three-Dimensional Navier-Stokes Solver,” AIAA Paper No. 2002-5642.
Benini, E. , 2004, “ Three-Dimensional Multi-Objective Design Optimization of a Transonic Compressor Rotor,” J. Propul. Power, 20(4), pp. 612–619. [CrossRef]
Jang, C. M. , Li, P. , and Kim, K. Y. , 2005, “ Optimization of Blade Sweep in a Axial Transonic Compressor Rotor,” JSME Int. J., Ser. B, 48(4), pp. 793–801. [CrossRef]
Oyama, A. , Liou, M. S. , and Obayashi, S. , 2002, “ High-Fidelity Swept and Leaned Rotor Blade Design Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithm,” AIAA Paper No. 2002-4091. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2003-4091
Razavi, S. R. , and Boroomand, M. , 2014, “ Numerical and Performance Analysis of One Row Transonic Rotor With Sweep and Lean Angle,” J. Therm. Sci., 23(5), pp. 438–445. [CrossRef]
Razavi, S. R. , and Boroomand, M. , 2013, “ Optimal Design and Aerodynamic Study of Leaned Transonic Axial Flow Fan Rotors,” ASME Paper No. IMECE2014-39796.
Strazisar, A. J. , Wood, J. R. , Hathaway, M. D. , and Suder, K. L. , 1989, “ Laser Anemometer Measurements in a Transonic Axial-Flow Fan Rotor,” NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH, Technical Report No. NASA TP-2879. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19900001929.pdf
Pierzga, M. J. , and Wood, J. R. , 1985, “ Investigation of the Three-Dimensional Flow Field Within a Transonic Fan Rotor: Experiment and Analysis,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 107(2), pp. 436–450. [CrossRef]
Kwedikha, A. R. A. , 2009, “ Aerodynamic Effects of Blade Sweep and Skew Applied to Rotors of Axial Flow Turbomachinery,” Ph.D. thesis, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary. https://repozitorium.omikk.bme.hu/bitstream/handle/10890/878/tezis_eng.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y
Roe, P. L. , 1981, “ Approximate Riemann Solvers, Parameter Vectors and Difference Scheme,” J. Comput. Phys., 43(2), pp. 357–372. [CrossRef]
Launder, B. E. , and Spalding, D. B. , 1974, “ The Numerical Computation of Turbulent Flows,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 3(2), pp. 269–289. [CrossRef]
Gallimore, S. J. , Bolger, J. J. , Cumpsty, N. A. , Taylor, M. J. , Wright, P. I. , and Place, J. M. M. , 2002, “ The Use of Sweep and Dihedral in Multistage Axial Flow Compressor Blading—Part I: University Research and Methods Development,” ASME J. Turbomach., 124(4), pp. 533–541. [CrossRef]
Mingming, M. , Yanping, S. , and Zhongqi, W. , 2008, “ Numerical Investigation of the Unsteady Flow in a Transonic Compressor With Curved Rotors,” Chin. J. Aeronaut., 21(2), pp. 97–104. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Meridional view of rotor-67 showing the locations of available experimental data

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Positive and negative leaned and swept blades [19]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Sigmoid function output according to neuron input

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Learning coefficient according to training loop number

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Training error against iteration: (a) swept blade and (b) leaned blade

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Schematic of boundary condition

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

2D grid between blades at midspan

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

3D H, J, C, and L grid

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Map of the rotor for the three grid types: (a) efficiency and (b) pressure ratio against mass flow rate

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Relative Mach number at 90% of span and near stall: (a) Experimental and (b) computations

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Relative Mach number at 30% of span and near peak efficiency: (a) Experimental and (b) computations

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Backward leaned blade implementation on section number two

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Comparison of curved rotor: (a) swept blade (negative sweep) and (b) leaned blade (positive lean)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Impact of FW-sweep at different sections against an unswept blade: (a) Pr against normalized mass flow rate and (b) Eff against normalized mass flow rate

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Impact of BW-sweep at midsections on an unswept blade: (a) efficiency against mass flow rate and (b) pressure ratio against normalized mass flow rate

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Impact of FW-lean at midsections on unswept blade

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Impact of BW-lean at midsections on unswept blade

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

Flow direction before and after shock around an unsweep rotor

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 21

Impact of FW-sweep on shock structure: (a) forward rotor and (b) basic blade

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 22

Optimized rotor (swept rotor with target function of all parameters) profile as compared to basic rotor: (a) optimized rotor and (b) basic rotor

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 23

Three parameter optimized rotor's operating line

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In