0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Structures and Dynamics

A Computational Fluid Dynamics Modified Bulk Flow Analysis for Circumferentially Shallow Grooved Liquid Seals

[+] Author and Article Information
Luis San Andrés

Mast-Childs Chair Professor
Fellow ASME
Turbomachinery Laboratory,
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77843
e-mail: lsanandres@tamu.edu

Tingcheng Wu

Turbomachinery Laboratory,
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77843
e-mail: wutingcheng29@gmail.com

Hideaki Maeda

Torishima Pump Mfg. Co., Ltd.,
1-1-8, Miyata-cho,
Takatsuki 569-8660, Osaka, Japan
e-mail: h-maeda@torishima.co.jp

Ono Tomoki

Torishima Pump Mfg. Co., Ltd.,
1-1-8, Miyata-cho,
Takatsuki 569-8660, Osaka, Japan
e-mail: tm-ono@torishima.co.jp

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Structures and Dynamics Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received July 3, 2017; final manuscript received July 4, 2017; published online September 19, 2017. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 140(1), 012504 (Sep 19, 2017) (9 pages) Paper No: GTP-17-1266; doi: 10.1115/1.4037614 History: Received July 03, 2017; Revised July 04, 2017

In straight-through centrifugal pumps, a grooved seal acts as a balance piston to equilibrate the full pressure rise across the pump. As the groove pattern breaks the development of fluid swirl, this seal type offers lesser leakage and lower cross-coupled stiffnesses than a similar size and clearance annular seal. Bulk-flow models (BFMs) predict expediently the static and dynamic force characteristics of annular seals; however they lack accuracy for grooved seals. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods give more accurate results, but are not computationally efficient. This paper presents a modified BFM to predict the rotordynamic force coefficients of shallow depth, circumferentially grooved liquid seals with an accuracy comparable to a CFD solution but with a simulation time of bulk-flow analyses. The procedure utilizes the results of CFD to evaluate the bulk flow velocity field and the friction factors for a 73 grooves annular seal (depth/clearance dg/Cr = 0.98 and length/diameter L/D = 0.9) operating under various sets of axial pressure drop and rotor speed. In a groove, the flow divides into a jet through the film land and a strong recirculation zone. The penetration angle (α), specifying the streamline separation in the groove cavity, is a function of the operating conditions; an increase in rotor speed or a lower pressure difference increases α. This angle plays a prominent role to evaluate the stator friction factor and has a marked influence on the seal direct stiffness. In the bulk-flow code, the friction factor model (f = nRem) is modified with the CFD extracted penetration angle (α) to account for the flow separation in the groove cavity. The flow rate predicted by the modified bulk-flow code shows good agreement with the measured result (6% difference). A perturbation of the flow field is performed on the bulk-flow equations to evaluate the reaction forces on the rotor surface. Compared to the rotordynamic force coefficients derived from the CFD results, the modified bulk-flow code predicts rotordynamic force coefficients within 10%, except that the cross-coupled damping coefficient is over-predicted up to 14%. An example test seal with a few grooves (L/D = 0.5, dg/Cr = 2.5) serves to further validate the predictions of the modified BFM. Compared to the original bulk-flow analysis, the current method shows a significant improvement in the predicted rotordynamic force coefficients, the direct stiffness and damping coefficients, in particular.

Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Childs, D. W. , 1993, Turbomachinery Rotordynamics: Phenomena, Modeling, and Analysis, Wiley, New York, Chap. 4.
San Andrés, L. , 2010, “ Modern Lubrication Theory: Turbulence Flow in Thin Film Bearings: Characteristics and Modeling,” Texas A&M University Digital Libraries, College Station, TX, accessed May 15, 2015, http://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/handle/1969.1/93197
Hirs, G. , 1973, “ A Bulk-Flow Theory for Turbulence in Lubricant Films,” ASME J. Tribol., 95(2), pp. 137–145.
Nordmann, R. , Dietzen, F. , and Weiser, H. , 1989, “ Calculation of Rotordynamic Coefficients and Leakage for Annular Gas Seals by Means of Finite Difference Techniques,” ASME J. Tribol., 111(3), pp. 545–552. [CrossRef]
Marquette, O. , and Childs, D. , 1996, “ An Extended Three-Control-Volume Theory for Circumferentially Grooved Liquid Seals,” ASME J. Tribol., 118(2), pp. 276–285. [CrossRef]
Florjančič, S. , and McCloskey, T. , 1991, “ Measurement and Prediction of Full Scale Annular Seal Coefficients,” Eighth International Pump Users Symposium, Houston, TX, Mar. 5–7, pp. 71–83. http://turbolab.tamu.edu/proc/pumpproc/P8/P871-83.pdf
Torishima Pump R&D, 2014, “ Validation of Rotor Stability Analysis by XLCGrv,” personal communication.
Untaroiu, A. , Untaroiu, C. D. , Wood, H. G. , and Allaire, P. E. , 2013, “ Numerical Modeling of Fluid-Induced Rotordynamic Forces in Seals With Large Aspect Ratios,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 135(1), p. 012501.
Schettel, J. , Deckner, M. , Kwanka, K. , Luneburg, B. , and Nordmann, R. , 2005, “ Rotordynamic Coefficients of Lab Seals for Turbines: Comparing CFD Results With Experimental Data on a Comb-Grooved Labyrinth,” ASME Paper No. GT2005-68732.
Moore, J. J. , Ransom, D. L. , and Viana, F. , 2010, “ Rotordynamic Force Prediction of Centrifugal Compressor Impellers Using Computational Fluid Dynamics,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 134(4), p. 042504.
Migliorini, P. J. , Untaroiu, A. , Wood, H. G. , and Allaire, P. E. , 2013, “ A Computational Fluid Dynamics/Bulk-Flow Hybrid Method for Determining Rotordynamic Coefficients of Annular Gas Seals,” ASME J. Tribol., 134(2), p. 022202. [CrossRef]
Arghir, M. , and Frene, J. , 2004, “ A Bulk-Flow Analysis of Static and Dynamic Characteristics of Eccentric Circumferentially Grooved Liquid Annular Seals,” ASME J. Tribol., 126(2), pp. 316–325. [CrossRef]
Villasmil, L. , Chen, H. , and Childs, D. W. , 2003, “ Evaluation of Near-Wall Turbulence Models for Liquid Annular Seals With Roughened Walls,” AIAA Paper No. 2003-3741.
Pinto, R. , Afzal, A. , D'Souza, L. , Ansari, Z. , and Samee, A. , 2017, “ Computational Fluid Dynamics in Turbomachinery: A Review of State of the Art,” Arch. Comput. Methods Eng., 24(3), pp. 467–479. [CrossRef]
Rao, J. S. , and Saravanokumar, M. , 2006, “ Numerical Simulation of Seal Flow and Determination of Stiffness and Damping Coefficient,” Seventh IFToMM-Conference on Rotor Dynamics, Vienna, Austria, Sept. 25–28, pp. 25–28.
Staubli, T. , and Bissig, M. , 2001, “ Numerically Calculated Rotor Dynamic Coefficients of a Pump Rotor Side Space,” International Symposium on Stability Control of Rotating Machinery (ISCORMA), South Lake Tahoe, CA, Aug. 20–24, p. 20.
Torishima Pump R&D, 2015, “ Flow Rate Data From Torishima_Dec_2015,” personal communication.
Florjančič, Š. , 1990, “ Annular Seals of High Energy Centrifugal Pumps: A New Theory and Full Scale Measurement of Rotordynamic Coefficients and Hydraulic Friction Factors,” Ph.D. thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, Switzerland. https://www.research-collection.ethz.ch/handle/20.500.11850/140489?show=full
Scharrer, J. K. , 1987, “ A Comparison of Experimental and Theoretical Results for Labyrinth Gas Seals,” M.S. thesis, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
Marquette, O. R. , 1994, “ A New Three-Control-Volume Theory for Circumferentially-Grooved Liquid Seals,” M.S. thesis, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
Nordmann, R. , Dietzen, F. J. , Janson, W. , Frei, A. , and Florjancic, S. , 1986, “ Rotordynamic Coefficients and Leakage Flow of Parallel Grooved Seals and Smooth Seals,” Fifth Workshop on Rotordynamic Instability Problems in High-Performance Turbomachinery, College Station, TX, June 2–4, pp. 129–153. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19870012773

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Geometry of a circumferentially grooved annular liquid seal

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schematic views (front and side) of grooved seal with spinning and whirling rotor (not to scale)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Schematic view of rotor whirl and spinning motion in a rotating coordinate system (ωt = 0) (drawing not to scale)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Depiction of mesh for flow domain in seal: inlet section and groove and land sections

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Applied boundary conditions (in rotating frame) at inlet and exit planes of seal

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Computational fluid dynamics predictions: components of grooved seal reaction force, FX/e and FY/e, versus whirl frequency: (a) radial direction and (b) tangential direction. Nominal operating condition ΔP = 29.9 MPa, rotor speed = 5588 rpm (curve fits shown).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Schematic view of three-control-volume model utilized in a BFM [18]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Computational fluid dynamics derived normalized bulk-flow velocities along the seal length direction. Seal at nominal operating condition.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Example of flow in 50th groove of seal: streamlines to obtain penetration angle (α) from separation streamline (seal at nominal operating condition)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Penetration angle (α¯) versus parameter β = ΔP/[(1/2) ρR)2]. CFD Results derived from multiple operating conditions.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Computational fluid dynamics and bulk-flow (BF) derived axial direction friction factor (frz) on the rotor surface: (a) Z/L: 0 ∼ 1 and (b) groove and land sections at Z/L = 0.796 ∼ 0.810 (58th groove). Grooved seal at nominal operating condition.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Computational fluid dynamics and bulk-flow (BF) derived circumferential direction friction factor (f) on the rotor surface: (a) Z/L: 0 ∼ 1 and (b) groove and land sections at Z/L = 0.796 ∼ 0.810 (58th groove). Grooved seal at nominal operating condition.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Computational fluid dynamics and bulk-flow (BF) derived axial direction friction factor (fsz) on the stator surface: (a) Z/L: 0 ∼ 1 and (b) groove and land sections at Z/L = 0.796 ∼ 0.810 (58th groove). Grooved seal at nominal operating condition.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Computational fluid dynamics and bulk-flow (BF) derived circumferential direction friction factor (f) on stator surface: (a) Z/L: 0 ∼ 1 and (b) groove and land sections at Z/L = 0.796 ∼ 0.810 (58th groove). Grooved seal at nominal operating condition.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Computational fluid dynamics and bulk-flow (BF) components of grooved seal reaction force, FX/e and FY/e, versus whirl frequency (ω): (a) radial direction and (b) tangential direction. ΔP = 20 MPa, rotor speed = 4570 rpm.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In