0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Turbomachinery

Investigation Into the Thermal Limitations of Steam Turbines During Start-Up Operation

[+] Author and Article Information
Monika Topel

Department of Energy Technology,
Royal Institute of Technology,
Stockholm SE-100 44, Sweden
e-mail: monika.topel@energy.kth.se

Åsa Nilsson

Siemens Industrial Turbomachinery AB,
Finspång SE-612 83, Sweden
e-mail: asa.nilsson@siemens.com

Markus Jöcker

Siemens Industrial Turbomachinery AB,
Finspång SE-612 83, Sweden
e-mail: markus.jocker@siemens.com

Björn Laumert

Department of Energy Technology,
Royal Institute of Technology,
Stockholm SE-100 44, Sweden
e-mail: bjorn.laumert@energy.kth.se

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Turbomachinery Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received July 3, 2017; final manuscript received July 11, 2017; published online September 19, 2017. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 140(1), 012603 (Sep 19, 2017) (8 pages) Paper No: GTP-17-1252; doi: 10.1115/1.4037664 History: Received July 03, 2017; Revised July 11, 2017

Liberalized electricity market conditions and concentrating solar power technologies call for increased power plant operational flexibility. Concerning the steam turbine (ST) component, one key aspect of its flexibility is the capability for fast starts. In current practice, turbine start-up limitations are set by consideration of thermal stress and low cycle fatigue. However, the pursuit of faster starts raises the question whether other thermal phenomena can become a limiting factor to the start-up process. Differential expansion (DE) is one of such thermal properties, especially since the design of axial clearances is not included as part of start-up schedule design and because its measurement during operation is often limited or not a possibility at all. The aim of this work is to understand DE behavior with respect to transient operation and to quantify the effect that such operation would have in the design and operation of axial clearances. This was accomplished through the use of a validated thermomechanical model that was used to compare DE behavior for different operating conditions of the machine. These comparisons showed that faster starts do not necessarily imply that wider axial clearances are needed, which means that the thermal flexibility of the studied turbine is not limited by DE. However, for particular locations, it was also obtained that axial rubbing can indeed become a limiting factor in direct relation to start-up operation. The resulting approach presented in this work serves to avoid over-conservative limitations in both design and operation concerning axial clearances.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Leyzerovich, A. , 1997, Large Power Steam Turbines: Design and Operation, Vol. 2, 2nd ed., Penn Well Books, Tulsa, OK.
VGB PowerTech, 1990, Thermal Behavior of Steam Turbines, VGB-R 105 Me, 2nd ed., VGB PowerTech e.V., Essen, Germany.
Gülen, S. C. , 2013, “ Gas Turbine Combined Cycle Fast Start: The Physics Behind the Concept,” Power Eng., 117(6), pp. 40–49. http://www.power-eng.com/articles/print/volume-117/issue-6/features/gas-turbine-combined-cycle-fast-start-the-physics-behind-the-con.html
Beer, W. , Propp, L. , and Voelker, L. , 2015, “ A Simplified Analytical Approach for Calculating the Start-Up Time of Industrial Steam Turbines for Optimal and Fast Start-Up Procedures,” ASME Paper No. GT2015-43284.
Greis, J. , Gobrecht, E. , and Wendt, S. , 2012, “ Flexible and Economical Operation of Power Plants-25 Years of Expertise,” ASME Paper No. GT2012-68716.
Marinescu, G. , Ehrsam, A. , Sell, M. , and Brunner, P. , 2013, “ Experimental Investigation in Thermal Behavior of Steam Turbine Components—Part 3: Startup and the Impact of LCF Life,” ASME Paper No. GT2013-94356.
Ekbote, A. , and Brilliant, H. , 2008, “ The Analytical Approach to the Temperature Prediction of Steam Turbine Shells Based on the Thermocouple Temperature Measurements at a Few Points,” ASME Paper No. GT2009-50609.
Watanabe, E. , Nakano, T. , Tanaka, K. , Tsutsumi, M. , Tanaka, Y. , Ohyama, H. , Miyawaki, T. , and Shinohara, T. , 2003, “ Development of New High Efficiency Steam Turbine,” Tech. Rev. Mitsubishi Heavy Ind., 40(4), pp. 1–6. https://mhi.co.jp/technology/review/pdf/e404/e404212.pdf
Hauser, A. , Hetico, R. , and Wakeman, T. , 1985, “ Thermally Responsive Labyrinth Seal,” General Electric Company, Boston, MA, U.S. Patent No. US4513975 A. http://www.google.co.in/patents/US4513975
Couture, B. , Keeling, L. , and Kowalczyk, M. , 2006, “ Clearance and Seals Design for New Heat Steam Turbine,” ASME Paper No. POWER2006-88201.
Spelling, J. , Jöcker, M. , and Martin, A. , 2012, “ Thermal Modeling of a Solar Steam Turbine With a Focus on Start-Up Time Reduction,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 134(1), p. 013001.
Topel, M. , 2014, “ Steam Turbine Thermal Modeling for Improved Transient Operation,” Licentiate thesis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Topel, M. , Genrup, M. , Jöcker, M. , Spelling, J. , and Laumert, B. , 2015, “ Operational Improvements for Start-Up Time Reduction in Solar Steam Turbines,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 137(4), p. 042604.
Topel, M. , Jöcker, M. , Paul, S. , and Laumert, B. , 2015, “ Differential Expansion Sensitivity Studies During Steam Turbine Startup,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 138(8), p. 062102.
Topel, M. , Spelling, J. , Jöcker, M. , and Laumert, B. , 2013, “ Geometric Modularity in the Thermal Modeling of Solar Steam Turbines,” Energy Procedia, 49, pp. 1737–1746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.03.184
Brilliant, H. , and Tolpadi, H. , 2004, “ Analytical Approach to Steam Turbine Heat Transfer in a Combined Cycle Power Plant,” ASME Paper No. GT2004-53387.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Steam turbine thermal transient model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Turbine modular geometry and corresponding temperature measurement locations

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Comparison of casing temperature results of thermal model and measured data for CS

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Comparison of casing temperature results of thermal model and measured data for WS

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Comparison of differential expansion results of thermal model and measured data for CS

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Comparison of differential expansion results of thermal model and measured data for WS

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

DE behavior throughout the axial direction of the turbine: comparison of the validated transient starts against the established thermal lower and upper limits for clearance design

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Differential expansion behavior against time for three seal locations during validated (left) cold and (right) warm starts

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Available space at the clearances of the modeled turbine for the nominal case against two scenarios of temperature differences between casing and rotor at the beginning of the start

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Differential expansion margins for clearance design throughout the axial direction of the turbine: comparison of the nominal case against two scenarios of temperature differences between casing and rotor at the beginning of the start

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Design (left-solid), measured data (left-dotted), and faster (right) cold start schedules

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Differential expansion behavior against time for three seal locations during (left) nominal and (right) aggressive cold starts

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In