0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Structures and Dynamics

Interface Reduction in Craig–Bampton Component Mode Synthesis by Orthogonal Polynomial Series

[+] Author and Article Information
Luigi Carassale

Department of Mechanical, Energy,
Management and Transportation Engineering,
University of Genova,
Genova 16145, Italy
e-mail: luigi.carassale@unige.it

Mirko Maurici

Ansaldo Energia,
Genova 16152, Italy
e-mail: mirko.maurici@ansaldoenergia.com

Contributed by the Structures and Dynamics Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received July 11, 2017; final manuscript received August 15, 2017; published online December 12, 2017. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 140(5), 052504 (Dec 12, 2017) (8 pages) Paper No: GTP-17-1341; doi: 10.1115/1.4038154 History: Received July 11, 2017; Revised August 15, 2017

The component mode synthesis (CMS) based on the Craig–Bampton (CB) method has two strong limitations that appear when the number of the interface degrees-of-freedom (DOFs) is large. First, the reduced-order model (ROM) obtained is overweighed by many unnecessary DOF. Second, the reduction step may become extremely time consuming. Several interface reduction (IR) techniques addressed successfully the former problem, while the latter remains open. In this paper, we tackle this latter problem through a simple IR technique based on an a-priory choice of the interface modes. An efficient representation of the interface displacement field is achieved adopting a set of orthogonal basis functions determined by the interface geometry. The proposed method is compared with other existing IR methods on a case study regarding a rotor blade of an axial compressor.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

de Klerk, D. , Rixen, D. J. , and Voormeeren, S. N. , 2008, “ General Framework for Dynamic Substructuring: History, Review and Classification of Techniques,” AIAA J., 46(5), pp. 1169–1181. [CrossRef]
Bampton, M. C. C. , and Craig, R. R. , 1968, “ Coupling of Substructures for Dynamic Analyses,” AIAA J., 6(7), pp. 1313–1319. https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/3.4741
Bladh, R. , Castanier, M. P. , and Pierre, C. , 2001, “ Component-Mode-Based Reduced Order Modeling Techniques for Mistuned Bladed Disks—Part I: Theoretical Models,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 123(1), pp. 89–99. [CrossRef]
Castanier, M. P. , Tan, Y.-C. , and Pierre, C. , 2001, “ Characteristic Constraint Modes for Component Mode Synthesis,” AIAA J., 39(6), pp. 1182–1187. [CrossRef]
Brahmi, K. , Bouhaddi, N. , and Fillod, R. , 1995, “ Reduction of Junction Degrees of Freedom in Certain Methods of Dynamic Substructure Synthesis,” 13th International Modal Analysis Conference (IOMAC), Nashville, TN, Feb. 13–16, pp. 1763–1769. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/241271306_Reduction_of_Junction_Degrees_of_Freedom_in_Certain_Methods_of_Dynamic_Substructure_Synthesis
Tran, D.-M. , 2001, “ Component Mode Synthesis Methods Using Interface Modes. Application to Structures With Cyclic Symmetry,” Comput. Struct., 79(2), pp. 209–222. [CrossRef]
Hong, S.-K. , Epureanu, B. I. , and Castanier, M. P. , 2013, “ Next-Generation Parametric Reduced-Order Models,” Mech. Sys. Sig. Proc., 37(1–2), pp. 403–421. [CrossRef]
Balmès, E. , 1996, “ Use of Generalized Interface Degrees of Freedom in Component Mode Synthesis,” 14th International Modal Analysis Conference (IMAC), Dearborn, MI, Feb. 12–15, pp. 204–210. http://www.sdtools.com/pdf/IMAC96int.pdf
Aoyama, Y. , and Yagawa, G. , 2001, “ Component Mode Synthesis for Large-Scale Structural Eigenanalysis,” Comput. Struct., 79(6), pp. 605–615. [CrossRef]
Donders, S. , Pluymers, B. , Ragnarsson, P. , Hadjit, R. , and Desmet, W. , 2010, “ The Wave-Based Substructuring Approach for the Efficient Description of Interface Dynamics in Substructuring,” J. Sound Vib., 329(8), pp. 1062–1080. [CrossRef]
Lindberg, E. , Hörlin, N.-E. , and Göransson, P. , 2013, “ Component Mode Synthesis Using Undeformed Interface Coupling Modes to Connect Soft and Stiff Substructures,” Shock Vib., 20(1), pp. 157–170. [CrossRef]
Holzwarth, P. , and Eberhard, P. , 2015, “ Interface Reduction for CMS Methods and Alternative Model Order Reduction,” IFAC-Pap. OnLine, 48(1), pp. 254–259. [CrossRef]
Polizzi, E. , 2009, “ Density-Matrix-Based Algorithms for Solving Eigenvalue Problems,” Phys. Rev. B., 79(11), pp. 115–112. [CrossRef]
Petra, C. G. , Schenk, O. , Lubin, M. , and Gärtner, K. , 2014, “ An Augmented Incomplete Factorization Approach for Computing the Schur Complement in Stochastic Optimization,” SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 36(2), pp. C139–C162. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Mesh of airfoil (a) and root (b)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Orthogonal polynomial series interface modes. Polynomial order d = 3.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Error in the natural frequency with respect to the classical CB method as a function of the IR order. The separation among modes with radial, axial, and tangential direction is pertinent only for the OPS method.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Two-dimensional FE used for integration on the interface

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In