Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Aircraft Engine

Optimal Architectures for Dry and Wet Gas-Turbine Engines

[+] Author and Article Information
Rebecca Zarin Pass

Energy Technology Area,
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory,
Berkeley, CA 94720
e-mail: rzpass@lbl.gov

Sankaran Ramakrishnan

Institute for Data, Systems and Society,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
Cambridge, MA 02139
e-mail: sankara@mit.edu

Chris Edwards

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Stanford University,
Stanford, CA 94305
e-mail: cfe@stanford.edu

Contributed by the Aircraft Engine Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received July 21, 2017; final manuscript received November 5, 2017; published online June 15, 2018. Assoc. Editor: Klaus Dobbeling.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 140(9), 091202 (Jun 15, 2018) (12 pages) Paper No: GTP-17-1383; doi: 10.1115/1.4038794 History: Received July 21, 2017; Revised November 05, 2017

We systematically determine the maximally efficient manner of using water and air in a single-cycle steady-flow combustion gas turbine power plant. In doing so, we identify the upper limit to exergy efficiency for dry and wet gas turbine engines through architectures that employ regenerative work, heat, and matter transfers using imperfect practical devices. For existing device technology, the derived optimal architectures can theoretically achieve exergy efficiency above 65% without employing a bottoming cycle. This surpasses known efficiencies for both wet and combined cycles. We also show that when optimally used, nonreactive matter transfers, like water, provide an alternative, but not superior, thermal regeneration strategy to direct heat regeneration.

Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Ramakrishnan, S. , and Edwards, C. F. , 2014, “Maximum-Efficiency Architectures for Steady-Flow Combustion Engines—II: Work-Regenerative Gas Turbine Engines,” Energy, 72, pp. 58–68. [CrossRef]
Ramakrishnan, S. , and Edwards, C. F. , 2016, “Maximum-Efficiency Architectures for Heat- and Work-Regenerative Gas Turbine Engines,” Energy, 100, pp. 115–128. [CrossRef]
Jonsson, M. , and Yan, J. , 2005, “Humidified Gas Turbines—A Review of Proposed and Implemented Cycles,” Energy, 30(7), pp. 1013–1078. [CrossRef]
Van Liere, J. , and Laagland, G. , 2000, “The Tophat® Cycle,” VDI-Ber., 2000, pp. 161–175.
Bracco, S. , Pierfederici, A. , and Trucco, A. , 2007, “The Wet Compression Technology for Gas Turbine Power Plants: Thermodynamic Model,” Appl. Therm. Eng., 27(4), pp. 699–704. [CrossRef]
Rao, A. , 1989, “Process for Producing Power,” Fluor Corporation, Irving, TX, U.S. Patent No. 4,829,763. https://www.google.com/patents/US4829763
Horlock, J. H. , 2003, Advanced Gas Turbine Cycles, Elsevier Science, Oxford, UK.
Hung, T.-C. , Shai, T. , and Wang, S. , 1997, “A Review of Organic Rankine Cycles (ORCs) for the Recovery of Low-Grade Waste Heat,” Energy, 22(7), pp. 661–667. [CrossRef]
Ghazikhani, M. , Khazaee, I. , and Abdekhodaie, E. , 2014, “Exergy Analysis of Gas Turbine With Air Bottoming Cycle,” Energy, 72, pp. 599–607. [CrossRef]
Poullikkas, A. , 2005, “An Overview of Current and Future Sustainable Gas Turbine Technologies,” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 9(5), pp. 409–443. [CrossRef]
Korobitsyn, M. A. , 1998, “New and Advanced Conversion Technologies: Analysis of Cogeneration, Combined and Integrated Cycles,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands. https://research.utwente.nl/en/publications/new-and-advanced-conversion-technologies-analysis-of-cogeneration
Heppenstall, T. , 1998, “Advanced Gas Turbine Cycles for Power Generation: A Critical Review,” Appl. Therm. Eng., 18(910), pp. 837–846. [CrossRef]
Chase, D. L. , and Kehoe, P. T. , 2000, “GE Combined-Cycle Product Line and Performance,” GE Power Systems, Schenectady, NY, GE Report No. GER-3574G. https://www.gepower.com/content/dam/gepower-pgdp/global/en_US/documents/technical/ger/ger-3574g-ge-cc-product-line-performance.pdf
GE Power, 2013, “LMS100 Gas Turbine (60 Hz) Fact Sheet,” GE Power & Water, Schenectady, NY, Technical Report. https://www.gepower.com/content/dam/gepower-pgdp/global/en_US/documents/product/lms100-60hz-fact-sheet.pdf
Siemens AG, 2009, “Siemens Gas Turbine SGT6-5000F,” Siemens, Erlangen, Germany, Technical Report No. E50001-W220-A112-V4-4A00. https://www.energy.siemens.com/hq/pool/hq/power-generation/gas-turbines/SGT6-5000F/SGT6-5000F%20PAC_LowRes.pdf
Yuri, M. , Masada, J. , Tsukagoshi, K. , Ito, E. , and Hada, S. , 2013, “Development of 1600c-Class High-Efficiency Gas Turbine for Power Generation Applying J-Type Technology,” Mitsubishi Heavy Ind. Tech. Rev., 50(3), pp. 1–10. https://www.mhi.com/company/technology/review/Vol.50No.3/abstracte-50-3-1.html
Kavanagh, R. M. , and Parks, G. T. , 2009, “A Systematic Comparison and Multi-Objective Optimization of Humid Power Cycles—Part I: Thermodynamics,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 131(4), p. 041701. [CrossRef]
El-Masri, M. , 1988, “A Modified, High-Efficiency, Recuperated Gas Turbine Cycle,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 110(2), pp. 233–242. [CrossRef]
Ramakrishnan, S. , and Edwards, C. F. , 2014, “Unifying Principles of Irreversibility Minimization for Efficiency Maximization in Steady-Flow Chemically-Reactive Engines,” Energy, 68, pp. 844–853. [CrossRef]
Dunbar, W. R. , and Lior, N. , 1994, “Sources of Combustion Irreversibility,” Combust. Sci. Technol., 103(1), pp. 41–61. [CrossRef]
Som, S. K. , and Datta, A. , 2008, “Thermodynamic Irreversibilities and Exergy Balance in Combustion Processes,” Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 34(3), pp. 351–376. [CrossRef]
Miranda, J. , Polanka, M. D. , and Simmons, R. J. , 2014, “The Use of an Ultra-Compact Combustor as an Inter-Turbine Burner for Improved Engine Performance,” AIAA Paper No. 2014-0458.
Ramakrishnan, S. , Teh, K.-Y. , Miller, S. L. , and Edwards, C. F. , 2011, “Optimal Architecture for Efficient Simple-Cycle, Steady-Flow, Combustion Engines,” J. Propul. Power, 27(4), pp. 873–883. [CrossRef]
Zarin Pass, R. , 2015, “Developing Maximum-Efficiency Architectures for Steady-Flow Chemical Engines,” Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. https://stacks.stanford.edu/file/druid:dp252vs9919/thesis-augmented.pdf
MathWorks, 2013, “Matlab and Statistics Toolbox Release 2013b,” The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA.
Goodwin, D. G. , 2003, “An Open-Source, Extensible Software Suite for CVD Process Simulation,” Chemical Vapor Deposition XVI and EUROCVD 14, Paris, France, Apr. 27–May 2, pp. 155–162. https://www.electrochem.org/dl/ma/203/pdfs/2038.pdf
Smith, G. P. , Golden, D. M. , Frenklach, M. , Moriarty, N. W. , Eiteneer, B. , Goldenberg, M. , Bowman, C. T. , Hanson, R. K. , Song, S. , Gardiner, J. C. W. , Lissianski, V. V. , and Qin, Z. , 2006, “Gri-Mech Home Page,” University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA .
Reynolds, W. C. , 1979, Thermodynamic Properties in SI: Graphs, Tables, and Computational Equations for Forty Substances, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Mattingly, J. D. , 1996, Elements of Gas Turbine Propulsion, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Hada, S. , Tsukagoshi, K. , Masada, J. , and Ito, E. , 2015, “Gas Turbine Combined Cycle (GTCC) & Integrated Coal Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC),” Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Yokohama, Japan, Technical Report. https://www.mhi.com/discover/earth/technology/gtcc_igcc.html
Incropera, F. P. , 2011, Introduction to Heat Transfer, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Min, J. K. , Jeong, J. H. , Ha, M. Y. , and Kim, K. S. , 2009, “High Temperature Heat Exchanger Studies for Applications to Gas Turbines,” Heat Mass Transfer, 46(2), pp. 175–186. [CrossRef]
Bolland, O. , and Mathieu, P. , 1998, “Comparison of Two CO2 Removal Options in Combined Cycle Power Plants,” Energy Convers. Manage., 39(16–18), pp. 1653–1663. [CrossRef]
Botero, C. , Finkenrath, M. , Bartlett, M. , Chu, R. , Choi, G. , and Chinn, D. , 2009, “Redesign, Optimization, and Economic Evaluation of a Natural Gas Combined Cycle With the Best Integrated Technology CO2 Capture,” Energy Proc., 1(1), pp. 3835–3842. [CrossRef]
Sipöcz, N. , and Tobiesen, F. A. , 2012, “Natural Gas Combined Cycle Power Plants With CO2 Capture–Opportunities to Reduce Cost,” Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, 7, pp. 98–106. [CrossRef]
Levine, I. N. , 1995, Physical Chemistry, 4th ed., McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA, Chap. 4, p. 112. [PubMed] [PubMed]
Hatamiya, S. , Araki, H. , Katagiri, Y. , and Marushima, S. , 2007, “An Experimental and Analytical Study on the Advanced Humid Air Turbine System,” Challenges of Power Engineering and Environment, Springer, Berlin, pp. 290–296. [CrossRef]
Zarin Pass, R. , and Edwards, C. , 2012, “Exergy Analysis of a Solid-Oxide Fuel Cell, Gas Turbine, Steam Turbine Triple-Cycle Power Plant,” ASME Paper No. IMECE2012-89609.
Siemens AG, 2013, “Flex-Plant Solutions: Flexibility for All Your Generation Needs,” Siemens, Erlangen, Germany, Technical Report No. E50001-W220-A125-X-76US. http://m.energy.siemens.com/hq/pool/hq/power-generation/power-plants/gas-fired-power-plants/FlexPlant-Brochure-LR.pdf
Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Systems, 2017, “Gas Turbines: M501J Series,” Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Systems, Lake Mary, FL, Report No. PSB0-01GT07E1-C-0. https://www.mhps.com/catalogue/pdf/mhps_gas_turbine_m501g_m701g.pdf


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Generalized cycle with flexible work, heat, and matter transfers

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Equilibration surfaces for a methane–air system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Optimal work-and-heat regenerative cycle [2]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Simple-cycle gas-turbine engine, shown with two stages of compression and expansion

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Introduction of a feed-forward matter transfer at an arbitrary pressure: (a) simple cycle without feed-forward and (b) simple cycle with feed-forward air

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Effect of feed-forward transfer on exergy distribution

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Introduction of a feedback matter transfer at an arbitrary pressure: (a) simple cycle without feedback, (b) simple cycle with feedback, and (c) feedback as a parallel cycle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Feedback effects on system performance: (a) effect of feedback pressure on system pressure and (b) effect of feedback pressure on exergy distribution

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Comparison of reactant stream mixing locations: (a) mixing before compression and (b) compression before mixing

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Exergy distribution for different water injection locations

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Full architecture with water injection after intercooling

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Efficiency-work curves of architectures with optimized parameters over a range of equivalence ratios and water quantities. Water percentages defined as mass of water with respect to mass of air. TIT = 1650 K in all cases.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Exergy distribution across different amounts of water injection. ϕ = 0.5, TIT = 1650 K: (a) internal exergy destruction and (b) external exergy destruction.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Optimal architecture for various allowable energy transfers




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In