Research Papers: Internal Combustion Engines

Experimental Investigation of NOx Formation in a Dual Fuel Engine

[+] Author and Article Information
Luke Hagen

Hiltner Combustion Systems,
Ferndale, WA 98248
e-mail: lmh@hcs-nw.com

Baine Breaux

Hiltner Combustion Systems,
Ferndale, WA 98248
e-mail: bbb@hcs-nw.com

Michael Flory

Hiltner Combustion Systems,
Ferndale, WA 98248
e-mail: msf@hcs-nw.com

Joel Hiltner

Hiltner Combustion Systems,
Ferndale, WA 98248
e-mail: jdh@hcs-nw.com

Scott Fiveland

Caterpillar, Inc.,
Peoria, IL 61602
e-mail: Fiveland_Scott_B@cat.com

Contributed by the IC Engine Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received April 9, 2018; final manuscript received April 13, 2018; published online August 9, 2018. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 140(12), 122802 (Aug 09, 2018) (6 pages) Paper No: GTP-18-1160; doi: 10.1115/1.4040179 History: Received April 09, 2018; Revised April 13, 2018

The North American oil and gas industry has experienced a market pull for dual fuel (DF) engines that can run on any ratio of fuels ranging from 100% diesel to a high proportion of field gas relative to diesel, while also meeting the U.S. Tier 4 Nonroad emissions standards. A DF engine must meet complex and at times competing requirements in terms of performance, fuel tolerance, and emissions. The challenges faced in designing a DF engine to meet all of the performance and emissions requirements require a detailed understanding of the trade-offs for each pollutant. This paper will focus on the details of NOx formation for high substitution DF engines. Experimental results have demonstrated that NOx emission trends (as a function of lambda) for DF engines differ from both traditional diesel engines and lean burn natural gas (NG) engines. For high energy substitution (>70%) conditions, NOx emissions are a function of the premixed gas lambda (λng) and contain a local minimum, with NOx increasing as lambda is either leaned or richened beyond the local minimum which occurs from approximately λng = 1.7 – 1.85. It is hypothesized that at richer conditions (λng < 1.7), NOx formed in the burning of gaseous fuel results in increased total NOx emissions. At leaner conditions (λng > 1.85), the NOx formed in the diesel post flame regions, as a result of increased oxygen availability, results in increased total NOx emissions. Between these two regions there are competing effects which result in relatively constant NOx.

Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Heywood, J. B. , 1988, Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals (McGraw-Hill Series in Mechanical Engineering), McGraw-Hill, New York.
Fay, J. A. , Heywood, J. B. , and Linden, L. H. , 1971, “ Jet Aircraft Air Pollutant Production and Dispersion,” AIAA J., 9(5), pp. 841–850. [CrossRef]
Newhall, H. , and Shahed, S. , 1971, “ Kinetics of Nitric Oxide Formation in High-Pressure Flames,” Symp. (Int.) Combust., 13(1), pp. 381–389. [CrossRef]
Lefebvre, A. H. , and Ballal, D. R. , 2010, Gas Turbine Combustion: Alternative Fuels and Emissions, 3rd ed., Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FL.
Sakai, Y. , Miyazaki, H. , and Mukai, K. , 1973, “ The Effect of Combustion Chamber Shape on Nitrogen Oxides,” SAE Paper No. 730154.
Dec, J. E. , 1997, “ A Conceptual Model of DI Diesel Combustion Based on Laser-Sheet Imaging,” SAE Paper No. 970873.
Musculus, M. P. B. , 2004, “ On the Correlation Between NOx Emissions and the Diesel Premixed Burn,” SAE Paper No. 2004-01-1401.
Yu, R. C. , and Shahed, S. M. , 1981, “ Effects of Injection Timing and Exhaust Gas Recirculation on Emissions From a D.I. Diesel Engine,” SAE Paper No. 811234.
Abd Alla, G. , Soliman, H. , Badr, O. , and Abd Rabbo, M. , 2002, “ Effect of Injection Timing on the Performance of a Dual Fuel Engine,” Energy Convers. Manage., 43(2), pp. 269–277. [CrossRef]
Singh, S. , Krishnan, S. R. , Srinivasan, K. K. , Midkiff, K. C. , and Bell, S. R. , 2004, “ Effect of Pilot Injection Timing, Pilot Quantity and Intake Charge Conditions on Performance and Emissions for an Advanced Low-Pilot-Ignited Natural Gas Engine,” Int. J. Engine Res., 5(4), pp. 329–348. [CrossRef]
Königsson, F. , Stalhammar, P. , and Angstrom, H.-E. , 2011, “ Characterization and Potential of Dual Fuel Combustion in a Modern Diesel Engine,” SAE Paper No. 2011-01-2223.
Serrano, D. , Obiols, J. , and Lecointe, B. , 2013, “ Optimization of Dual Fuel Diesel-Methane Operation on a Production Passenger Car Engine—Thermodynamic Analysis,” SAE Paper No. 2013-01-2505.
Korakianitis, T. , Namasivayam, A. , and Crookes, R. , 2011, “ Natural-Gas Fueled Spark-Ignition (SI) and Compression-Ignition (CI) Engine Performance and Emissions,” Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 37(1), pp. 89–112. [CrossRef]
Einewall, P. , Tunestl, P. , and Johansson, B. , 2005, “ Lean Burn Natural Gas Operation vs. Stoichiometric Operation With EGR and a Three Way Catalyst,” SAE Paper No. 2005-01-0250.
Kamimoto, T. , and Bae, M.-H. , 1988, “ High Combustion Temperature for the Reduction of Particulate in Diesel Engines,” SAE Paper No. 880423.
Kook, S. , Bae, C. , Miles, P. C. , Choi, D. , and Pickett, L. M. , 2005, “ The Influence of Charge Dilution and Injection Timing on Low-Temperature Diesel Combustion and Emissions,” SAE Paper No. 2005-01-3837.
Dec, J. E. , and Canaan, R. E. , 1998, “ PLIF Imaging of NO Formation in a DI Diesel Engine,” SAE Paper No. 980147.
Hockett, A. , Flory, M. , Hiltner, J. , and Fiveland, S. , 2017, “ Using Multi-Dimensional Combustion Simulations of a Natural Gas/Diesel Dual Fuel Engine to Investigate NOX Trends With Air-Fuel Ratio,” ASME Paper No. ICEF2017-3642.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Peak bulk gas temperature versus λng

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

The 10–90 burn duration and peak bulk temperature versus substitution

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

λng and BS-NOx versus substitution

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

BS-NOx versus λng at 80%, 85%, and 90% substitution

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

BS-NOx versus λtot at 80%, 85%, and 90% substitution

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Intake O2 concentration versus λng

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

BS-NOx versus λng, 80% substitution

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Peak bulk gas temperature versus λng at three different phasings, 80% substitution

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Understanding BS-NOx versus λng trends for high substitution DF combustion at fixed combustion phasing



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In