0
research-article

SECOND LAW ANALYSIS OF CONDENSING STEAM FLOWS

[+] Author and Article Information
Marius Grübel

Institute of Thermal Turbomachinery and Machinery Laboratory (ITSM), University of Stuttgart, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
marius.gruebel@itsm.uni-stuttgart.de

Markus Schatz

Institute of Thermal Turbomachinery and Machinery Laboratory (ITSM), University of Stuttgart, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
markus.schatz@itsm.uni-stuttgart.de

Damian M. Vogt

Institute of Thermal Turbomachinery and Machinery Laboratory (ITSM), University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
damian.vogt@itsm.uni-stuttgart.de

1Corresponding author.

ASME doi:10.1115/1.4040711 History: Received June 22, 2018; Revised June 25, 2018

Abstract

A numerical second law analysis is performed to determine the entropy production due to irreversibilities in condensing steam flows. In the present work the classical approach to calculate entropy production rates in turbulent flows based on velocity and temperature gradients is extended to two-phase condensing flows modeled within an Eulerian-Eulerian framework. This requires some modifications of the general approach and the inclusion of additional models to account for thermodynamic and kinematic relaxation processes. With this approach, the entropy production within each mesh element is obtained. In addition to the quantification of thermodynamic and kinematic wetness losses, a breakdown of aerodynamic losses is possible to allow for a detailed loss analysis. The aerodynamic losses are classified into wake mixing, boundary layer and shock losses. The application of the method is demonstrated by means of the flow through a well known steam turbine cascade test case. Predicted variations of loss coefficients for different operating conditions can be confirmed by experimental observations. For the investigated test cases, the thermodynamic relaxation contributes the most to the total losses and the losses due to droplet inertia are only of minor importance. The variation of the predicted aerodynamic losses for different operating conditions is as expected and demonstrates the suitability of the approach.

Copyright (c) 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In