Research Papers

Statistical Analysis of Component Failures: A 16 Year Survey on More Than 550 Wind Turbines

[+] Author and Article Information
Lorenzo Ferrari

Department of Energy, Systems, Territory and
Construction Engineering (DESTEC),
University of Pisa,
Largo Lucio Lazzarino, 1,
Pisa 56122, Italy
e-mail: lorenzo.ferrari@unipi.it

Guido Soldi

e2i Energie Speciali s.r.l,
Via Dante, 15,
Milano 20123, Italy
e-mail: guido.soldi@e2ienergiespeciali.it

Alessandro Bianchini

Department of Industrial Engineering,
University of Florence,
Via S. Marta, 3,
Firenze 50139, Italy
e-mail: alessandro.bianchini@unifi.it

Enzo Dalpane

e2i Energie Speciali s.r.l.,
Via Dante, 15,
Milano 20123, Italy
e-mail: enzo.dalpane@e2ienergiespeciali.it

Manuscript received June 28, 2018; final manuscript received July 19, 2018; published online October 24, 2018. Assoc. Editor: Liang Tang.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 140(12), 121012 (Oct 24, 2018) (9 pages) Paper No: GTP-18-1398; doi: 10.1115/1.4041131 History: Received June 28, 2018; Revised July 19, 2018

A good prediction of the failure ratio of wind turbine (WT) components is pivotal to define a correct maintenance program and reduce the downtime periods. Even a small failure can lead to long downtime periods and high repairing costs. The installation sites, which generally have limited accessibility, and the necessity of special facilities to reach the components inside the nacelle, also play a key role in the correct management of WTs. In this study, a detailed survey on the failures occurred to the WTs managed by the Italian operator “e2i energie speciali” (more than 550 machines) over 16 years was performed and the results were analyzed in detail. Each failure was classified by considering the damaged component and the related downtime period. The analysis allowed the determination of several useful results such as the trend of failure occurrence with machine age and the identification of components and macrocomponents which are more critical in terms of both number of occurrences and downtime periods. The combination of component failure occurrences and related downtime periods was also computed to estimate which component is most critical for WT operation.

Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


EWEA, 2015, “ EWEA Annual Statistics, 2015,” The European Wind Energy Association, Brussels, Belgium,, accessed Oct. 30, 2017, http://www.ewea.org/fileadmin/files/library/publications/statistics/EWEA-Annual-Statistics-2015.pdf
EWEA, 2009, The Facts: A Guide to the Technology, Economics and Future of Wind Power, European Wind Energy Association, Taylor & Francis, London.
Ribrant, J. , and Bertling, L. , 2007, “ Survey of Failures in Wind Power Systems With Focus on Swedish Wind Power Plants During 1997-2005,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., 22(1), pp. 167–173. [CrossRef]
Fischer, K. , Besnard, F. , and Bertling, L. , 2012, “ Reliability-Centered Maintenance for Wind Turbines Based on Statistical Analysis and Practical Experience,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., 27(1), pp. 184–195. [CrossRef]
Bertling, L. , Allan, R. N. , and Eriksson, R. , 2003, “ A Reliability-Centred Asset Maintenance Method for Assessing the Impact of Maintenance in Power Distribution Systems,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 20(1), pp. 75–82.
GSE, 2015, “ Statistics 2015,” GSE, Rome, Italy.
Battisti, L. , 2017, “ Quale minieolico,” Report, accessed Oct. 30, 2017, http://orizzontenergia.it/download/Appr/EOLICO/2014_01_02_Quale%20minieolico_L_Battisti_UniTN.pdf
Ribrant, J. , 2005/2006, “ Reliability Performance and Maintenance—A Survey of Failures in Wind Power Systems,” Master thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Davies, A. , 1998, Handbook of Condition Monitoring, Chapman & Hall, London.
Musial, W. , Butterfield, S. , and McNiff, B. , 2007, “ Improving Wind Turbine Gearbox Reliability,” European Wind Energy Conference, Milan, Italy, May 7–10, Paper No. NREL/CP-500-41548. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy07osti/41548.pdf
ICE, 2005, “ International Standard: Wind Turbines—Part 1: Design Requirements,” International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, Switzerland, Standard No. IEC 61400-1:2005-2008.
Ragheb, A. , and Ragheb, M. , 2011, “ Wind Turbine Gearbox Technologies,” Fundamental and Advanced Topics in Wind Power, Carriveau, R. , ed., IntechOpen, Rijeka, Croatia, Chap. 8.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Regional distribution and location of selected wind farms

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Number of machines (a) and installed capacity (b) by manufacturer

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Number of failures per operation year

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Failure rates per operation year and WT size

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Failure rates per operation year and component

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Failure rate (%) per main component

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Gearbox damage distribution

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Failure rate of DD and geared turbines per main component (same size 0.60 MW)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Turbulence standard deviation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Effects of installation site on failure rates (DD—0.60 MW power class)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Aggregated downtime per turbine subsystem

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Downtime distribution per component

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Reliability per a single wind turbine per year



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In