Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Structures and Dynamics

Compliant Hybrid Gas Bearing Using Modular Hermetically Sealed Squeeze Film Dampers

[+] Author and Article Information
Bugra Ertas

Mechanical Systems,
GE Global Research Center,
Niskayuna, NY 12308

Adolfo Delgado

Mechanical Engineering Department,
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77843

Contributed by the Structures and Dynamics Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received July 2, 2018; final manuscript received August 13, 2018; published online October 15, 2018. Editor: Jerzy T. Sawicki.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 141(2), 022504 (Oct 15, 2018) (10 pages) Paper No: GTP-18-1422; doi: 10.1115/1.4041310 History: Received July 02, 2018; Revised August 13, 2018

This paper presents a new gas bearing concept that targets machine applications in the megawatt (MW) power range. The concept involves combining a compliant hybrid gas bearing (CHGB) with two hermetically sealed squeeze film damper (HSFD) modules installed in the bearing support damper cavities. The main aim of the research was to demonstrate gas bearing-support damping levels using HSFD that rival conventional open-flow squeeze film dampers (SFD) in industry. A detailed description of the bearing design and functionality is discussed while anchoring the concept through a brief recap of past gas bearing concepts. Proof-of-concept experimental testing is presented involving parameter identification of the bearing support force coefficients along with a demonstration of speed and load capability using recessed hydrostatic pads. Finally, a landing test was performed on the bearing at high speed and load with porous carbon pads to show capability of sustaining rubs at high speeds. The component testing revealed robust viscous damping in the bearing support, which was shown to be comparable to existing state of the art SFD concepts. The damping and stiffness of the system-portrayed moderate frequency dependency, which was simulated using a 2D Reynolds-based incompressible fluid flow model. Finally, rotating tests demonstrated the ability of the gas bearing concept to sustain journal excursions and loads indicative of critical speed transitions experienced in large turbomachinery.

Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Agrawal, G. , 1990, “ Foil Gas Bearings for Turbomachinery,” SAE Technical Paper No. 901236.
Lubell, D. R. , Wade, J. L. , Chauhan, N. S. , and Nourse, J. G. , 2008, “ Identification and Correction of Rotor Instability in an Oil-Free Gas Turbine,” ASME Paper No. GT2008-50305.
Kingsbury, A. , 1897, “ Experiments With an Air-Lubricated Journal,” J. Am. Soc. Nav. Eng., 9(2), pp. 267–292.
Gross, W. A. , 1962, Gas Film Lubrication, Wiley, New York, p. 279.
Blok, H. , and van Rossum, J. J. , 1953, “ The Foil Bearing-New Departure in Hydrodynamic Lubrication,” ASLE J. Lubr. Eng., 9, pp. 316–330.
Lund, J. W. , 1967, “ A Theoretical Analysis of Whirl Instability and Pneumatic Hammer for a Rigid Rotor in Pressurized Gas Journal Bearings,” ASME J. Lubr. Technol., 89(2), pp. 154–166. [CrossRef]
Licht, L. , Fuller, D. D. , and Sternlicht, B. , 1958, “ Self-Excited Vibrations on an Air-Lubricated Thrust Bearing,” Trans. ASME, 80, pp. 411–414.
Stowell, T. B. , 1971, “ Pneumatic Hammer in a Gas Lubricated Externally Pressurized Annular Thrust Bearing,” ASME J. Lubr. Technol., 93(4), pp. 498–503. [CrossRef]
Talukder, H. M. , and Stowell, T. B. , 2003, “ Pneumatic Hammer in an Externally Pressurized Orifice-Compensated Air Journal Bearing,” Tribol. Int., 36(8), pp. 585–591. [CrossRef]
Morosi, S. , and Santos, I. , 2011, “ Active Lubrication Applied to Radial Gas Journal Bearings—Part 1: Modeling,” Tribol. Int., 44(12), pp. 1949–1958. [CrossRef]
Pierart, G. F. , and Santos, I. , 2016, “ Active Lubrication Applied to Radial Gas Journal Bearings—Part 2: Modeling Improvement and Experimental Validation,” Tribol. Int., 96, pp. 237–246. [CrossRef]
Kazimierski, Z. , and Jarzecki, K. , 1979, “ Stability Threshold of Flexibly Supported Hybrid Gas Journal Bearings,” ASME J. Lubr. Technol., 101(4), pp. 451–457. [CrossRef]
Tatara, A. , Koike, H. , and Iwasaki, A. , 1973, “ The Stability of Flexibly Supported, Externally Pressurized Gas Journal Bearings,” Bull. JSME, 16(100), pp. 1573–1579. [CrossRef]
Carpino, M. , and Peng, J. , 1994, “ Theoretical Performance of a Hydrostatic Foil Bearing,” ASME J. Tribol., 116(1), pp. 83–89. [CrossRef]
Kumar, M. , and Kim, D. , 2008, “ Parametric Studies on Dynamic Performance of Hybrid Airfoil Bearing,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 130(6), p. 062501. [CrossRef]
Rimpel, A. , and Kim, D. , 2009, “ Experimental and Analytical Studies on Flexure Pivot Tilting Pad Gas Bearings With Dampers Applied to Radially Compliant Pads,” ASME J. Tribol., 131(4), p. 041001. [CrossRef]
Ertas, B. H. , 2008, “ Compliant Hybrid Journal Bearings Using Integral Wire Mesh Dampers,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 131(2), p. 022503. [CrossRef]
Ertas, B. H. , Camatti, M. , and Mariotti, G. , 2009, “ Synchronous Response to Rotor Imbalance Using a Damped Gas Bearing,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 132(3), p. 032501. [CrossRef]
Delgado, A. , “ Experimental Identification of Dynamic Force Coefficients for a 110 MM Compliantly Damped Hybrid Gas Bearing,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 137(7), p. 072502. [CrossRef]
San Andrés, L. , Chirathadam, T. A. , and Kim, T. H. , 2010, “ Measurement of Structural Stiffness and Damping Coefficients in a Metal Mesh Foil Bearing,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 132(3), p. 032503. [CrossRef]
Feng, K. , Liu, Y. , Zhao, X. , and Liu, W. , 2016, “ Experimental Evaluation of the Structure Characterization of a Novel Hybrid Bump-Metal Mesh Foil Bearing,” ASME J. Tribol., 138(2), p. 021702. [CrossRef]
Ertas, B. H. , Delgado, A. , and Moore, J. J. , 2017, “ Dynamic Characterization of an Integral Squeeze Film Bearing Support Damper for a Super-Critical CO2 Expander,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 140(5), p. 052501. [CrossRef]
Della Pietra, L. , and Adiletta, G. , 2002, “ The Squeeze Film Damper Over Four Decades of Investigations—Part I: Characteristics and Operating Features,” Shock Vib. Dig., 34(1), pp. 3–26.
Taylor, D. L. , and Fehr, V. S. , 1982, “ Analysis and Design of Segmented Dampers for Rotor Dynamic Control,” ASME J. Lubr. Technol., 104(1), pp. 84–90. [CrossRef]
Ide, R. D. , and Zeidan, F. Y. , 1995, “ Integral Squeeze Film Damper Bearings,” U.S. Patent No. 5,421,655.
Leader, M. E. , Whalen, J. K. , and Grey, G. G. , 1995, “ The Design and Application of a Squeeze Film Damper Bearing to a Flexible Steam Turbine Rotor,” 24th Turbomachinery Symposium, Houston, TX, pp. 49–58. https://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/bitstream/handle/1969.1/163466/T2449-58.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Kanki, H. , Kaenko, Y. , Kurosawa, M. , and Yamamoto, T. , 1998, “ Prevention of Low-Frequency Vibration of High-Capacity Steam Turbine Units by Squeeze-Film Damper,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 120(2), pp. 391–396.
Ertas, B. , and Delgado, A. , 2018, “ Hermetically Sealed Squeeze Film Damper for Operation in Oil-Free Environments,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (in press).
Ertas, B. H. , Delgado, A. M. , Hallman, D. L. , and Smith, W. J. , 2016, “ Journal Bearing Assemblies and Methods of Assembling Same,” U.S. Patent No. 9429191. https://patents.google.com/patent/US9429191
Magge, N. , 1975, “ Philosophy, Design, and Evaluation of Soft-Mounted Engine Rotor Systems,” J. Aircr., 12(4), pp. 318–324. [CrossRef]
San Andrés, L. , and Delgado, A. , 2007, “ Identification of Force Coefficients in a Squeeze Film Damper With a Mechanical End Seal—Centered Circular Orbit Tests,” ASME J. Tribol., 129(3), pp. 660–668. [CrossRef]
Delgado, A. , Cantanzaro, M. , Mitanitonna, N. , and Gerbet, M. , 2011, “ Identification of Force Coefficients in a 5-pad Tilting Pad Bearing With an Integral Squeeze Film Damper,” EDF/Pprime PoitiersWorkshop, Poitiers, France, Oct. 6–7, pp. 1–20.
Ertas, B. H. , and Delgado, A. M. , 2016, “ Gas Bearing Having Integrally Formed Components,” U.S. Patent No. 9416820.
Mook, T. J. , Ertas, B. H. , and Bellardi, J. J. , 2017, “ Bearing,” U.S. Patent No. 9746029.
San Andres, L. , Cable, A. , T., Zheng , Y., De Santiago , O. , and Devitt, D. , 2016, “ Assessment of Porous Type Gas Bearings: Measurements of Bearing Performance and Rotor Vibrations,” ASME Paper No. GT2016-57876.
Ertas, B. , and Delgado, A. , 2018, “ Dynamic Characterization of a Novel Externally Pressurized Compliantly Damped Gas-Lubricated Bearing With Hermetically Sealed Squeeze Film Dampers,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (in press).


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Open-flow ISFD [32] versus CHGB HSFD: damper details

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Equivalent damping versus stiffness ratio [17]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Conventional open-flow SFD used in industry [25]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Past gas bearing concepts: (a) fixed geometry bearings, (b) external pressurized fixed geometry bearing, (c) actively pressurized fixed geometry bearing [10,11], (d) externally pressurized fixed geometry flexibly mounted bearings [12,13], (e) conventional bump foil bearing, (f) compliant hydrodynamic flexure pivot tilting pad bearing [16], (g) metal mesh foil bearing [20], (h) hybrid bump-foil metal mesh foil bearing [21], and (k) CHGB with MMD [1719]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Open-flow ISFD [32] versus CHGB w/HSFD: damping

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Rotating test set-up: (a) motor, (b) test article, (c) rotor, (d) FWD end slave bearing pedestal, (e) AFT end slave bearing pedestal, (f) electrohydraulic exciter, (g) shear neck spool coupling, (h) slave bearings, (i) hydrostatic inlet fitting, (j) FWD/AFT end Y direction proximity probes, (k) Y direction dynamic force transducer, (l) X direction dynamic force transducer, (m) Y direction test article housing acceleration, (n) stinger, (o) FWD/AFT end X direction proximity probes, (p) pad TC’s, and (q) static loader

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Dynamic translational orbital excitation at 8 krpm with hydrostatic recessed pads: excitation frequency 80 Hz; static bearing load 310 lbf (1.38 kN); inlet air pressure to bearing 175 psig (12 bar), bearing leakage 0.032 lbm/s (0.015 kg/s)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Bearing pad temperatures during translational orbital testing with hydrostatic recessed pads: excitation frequency 80 Hz; static bearing load 310 lbf (1.38 kN); inlet air pressure to bearing 175 psig (12 bar), bearing leakage 0.032 lbm/s (0.015 kg/s)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Dynamic conical motion testing: excitation frequency 140 Hz; static bearing load 310 lbf (1.38 kN); inlet air pressure to bearing 175 psig (12 bar), bearing leakage 0.032 lbm/s (0.015 kg/s)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Landing test on porous carbon pads: (1) bearing housing, (2) porous carbon pads: 14 krpm, static bearing load 310 lbf (1.38 kN); inlet air pressure to bearing 175 psig (12 bar)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Bearing support dynamic characterization: Stiffness and damping coefficients. Prediction approach from Ref. [28] for 1.5% GFV.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Example test at 84 Hz: Pad 1 with dampers 1 and 3

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Experimental test setup for dynamic characterization of the bearing support: (1) damper plunger, (2) damper strut, (3) primary accelerometer, (4) stinger, (5) dynamic force transducer, (6) primary proximity probe, (7) secondary accelerometers, (8) bearing pad, (9) bearing pad integral “S” springs, (10) pad clamp, and (11) secondary proximity probes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Compliant hybrid gas bearing with modular HSFD [29]: (1) bearing housing, (2) pad insert, (3) damper strut, (4) damper housing, (5) flexible elastomeric diaphragm and threaded stinger, (6) diaphragm retention disk, (7) damper end plate, (8) hydrostatic inlet tube, (9) film probe target, (10) hermetic SFD module, (11) upper damper cavity control volume, (12) lower damper cavity control volume, (13) damper restriction/gap, (14) damper plunger, (15) tilting pad integral spring KS, (16) compliant tilting pad, (17) rotor, (18) hybrid fluid film, (19) T/C or fill hole, (20) O-ring, (21) damper plug, and (22) damper centering spring

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Conventional open flow SFD versus HSFD [28] integrated into a CHGB pad and housing



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In