0
Research Papers

Investigation of NO2 Formation Kinetics in Dual-Fuel Engines With Lean Premixed Methane–Air Charge

[+] Author and Article Information
Ehsan Arabian

Lehrstuhl f. Thermodynamik,
Technische Universität München,
Garching 85748, Germany,
e-mail: arabian@td.mw.tum.de

Thomas Sattelmayer

Professor
Lehrstuhl f. Thermodynamik,
Technische Universität München,
Garching 85748, Germany
e-mail: Sattelmayer@td.mw.tum.de

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received March 11, 2019; final manuscript received March 15, 2019; published online April 11, 2019. Editor: Jerzy T. Sawicki.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 141(8), 081010 (Apr 11, 2019) (7 pages) Paper No: GTP-19-1107; doi: 10.1115/1.4043243 History: Received March 11, 2019; Revised March 15, 2019

A dual fuel engine concept with lean premixed methane–air charge ignited by a diesel pilot flame is highly promising for reducing NOx and soot emissions. One drawback of this combustion method, however, is the high nitric dioxide (NO2) emissions observed at certain operating points. The conditions leading to increased NO2 formation have been investigated using a batch reactor model in cantera. It has been found that the high emission levels of NO2 can be traced back to the mixing of small amounts of quenched CH4 with NO from the hot combustion zones followed by postoxidation in the presence of O2, requiring that the temperatures are within a certain range. NO2 formation in the exhaust duct of a test engine has been modeled and compared to the experimental results. The well-stirred reactor model has been used that calculates the steady-state of a uniform composition for a certain residence time. An appropriate reaction mechanism that considers the effect of NO/NO2 on methane oxidation at low temperature levels has been used. The numerical results of NO–NO2 conversion in the duct at low temperature levels show good agreement with the experimental results. The partial oxidation of CH4 can be predicted well. It can be shown that methane oxidation in the presence of NO/NO2 at low temperature levels is enhanced via the reaction steps CH3+NO2CH3O+NO and CH3O2+NOCH3O+NO2. In addition, the elementary reaction HO2+NONO2+OH is the important NO oxidizing step.

Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

de Wit, J. , Karll, B. , Nielsen, M. , and Kristensen, P. , 1998, “ Emission and Reduction of Organic Flue Gas Components From Lean-Burn Gas Engines,” International Gas Research Conference, San Diego, CA, Nov. 8–11, pp. 357–367.
Mckee, D. J. , and Rodriguez, R. M. , 1993, “ Health Effects Associated With Ozone and Nitrogen Dioxide Exposure,” Water Air Soil Pollut., 67(1–2), pp. 11–35. [CrossRef]
Rutishauser, M. , Ackermann, U. , Braun, C. , Gnehm, H. P. , and Wanner, H. U. , 1990, “ Significant Association Between Outdoor NO2 and Respiratory Symptoms in Preschool Children,” Lung, 168(S1), pp. 347–352. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kerr, H. , Kulle, T. , McIlhany, M. , and Swidersky, P. , 1979, “ Effects of Nitrogen Dioxide on Pulmonary Function in Human Subjects: An Environmental Chamber Study,” Environ. Res., 19(2), pp. 392–404. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Liu, S. , Li, H. , Gatts, T. , Liew, C. , Wayne, S. , Thompson, G. , Clark, N. , and Nuszkowski, J. , 2012, “ An Investigation of NO2 Emissions From a Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine Fumigated With H2 and Natural Gas,” Combust. Sci. Technol., 184(12), pp. 2008–2035. [CrossRef]
Miller, J. A. , and Bowman, C. T. , 1989, “ Mechanism and Modeling of Nitrogen Chemistry in Combustion,” Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 15(4), pp. 287–338. [CrossRef]
Hori, M. , Matsunaga, N. , Malte, P. C. , and Marinov, N. M. , 1992, “ The Effect of Low-Concentration Fuels on the Conversion of Nitric Oxide to Nitrogen Dioxide,” Symp. (Int.) Combust., 24(1), pp. 909–916. [CrossRef]
Bendtsen, A. B. , Glarborg, P. , and Dam-Johansen, K. , 2000, “ Low Temperature Oxidation of Methane: The Influence of Nitrogen Oxides,” Combust. Sci. Technol., 151(1), pp. 31–71. [CrossRef]
Bromly, J. H. , Barnes, F. J. , Muris, S. , You, X. , and Haynes, B. S. , 1996, “ Kinetic and Thermodynamic Sensitivity Analysis of the NO-Sensitised Oxidation of Methane,” Combust. Sci. Technol., 115(4–6), pp. 259–296. [CrossRef]
Goodwin, D. G. , Moffat, H. K. , and Speth, R. L. , 2017, “ Cantera: An Object-Oriented Software Toolkit for Chemical Kinetics, Thermodynamics, and Transport Processes—Version 2.3.0,” CERN Data Centre & Invenio, Genève, Switzerland.
Glarborg, P. , Alzueta, M. U. , Dam-Johansen, K. , and Miller, J. A. , 1998, “ Kinetic Modeling of Hydrocarbon/Nitric Oxide Interactions in a Flow Reactor,” Combust. Flame, 115(1–2), pp. 1–27. [CrossRef]
Marin, G. , and Yablonsky, G. S. , 2011, Kinetics of Chemical Reactions, Vol. 17, Wiley, Weinheim, Germany.
Yablonskii, 1991, Kinetic Models of Catalytic Reactions (Comprehensive Chemical Kinetics), Vol. 32, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Beychok, M. R. , 1973, “ NOx Emission From Fuel Combustion Controlled,” Oil Gas J., 71(9), pp. 53–56.
Ostriker, J. P. , Barenblatt, G. I. , and Sunyaev, R. A. , 1992, “ Oxidation of Nitrogen in Combustion and Explosions,” Selected Works of Yakov Borisovich Zeldovich, Volume I: Chemical Physics and Hydrodynamics, Y. B. Zeldovich, G. I. Barenblatt, and R. A. Sunyaev, eds., Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp. 404–410.
Lavoie, G. A. , Heywood, J. B. , and Keck, J. C. , 1970, “ Experimental and Theoretical Study of Nitric Oxide Formation in Internal Combustion Engines,” Combust. Sci. Technol., 1(4), pp. 313–326. [CrossRef]
Smith, G. P. , Golden, D. M. , Frenklach, M. , Moriarty, N. W. , Eiteneer, B. , Goldenberg, M. , Bowman, C. T. , Hanson, R. K. , Song, S. , Gardiner, W. C. , Lissianski, J. V. V. , and Qin, Z. , 1994, “ GRI-Mech 3.0,” Berkeley, CA.
Faravelli, T. , 2003, “ Kinetic Modeling of the Interactions Between NO and Hydrocarbons in the Oxidation of Hydrocarbons at Low Temperatures,” Combust. Flame, 132(1–2), pp. 188–207. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

XNO (———) and XNO2 (– – – – –) at equilibrium state

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Xi (———) and temperature (– – – – –) evolution for a methane-air mixture; initial conditions: Φ = 0.5, T = 1200 K, P = 100 bar

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Xi (———) and temperature (– – – – –) evolution for a methane-air-NO mixture; initial conditions: Φ = 0.5, XNO = 1000 ppm, T = 1200 K, P = 100 bar

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Xi (———) and temperature (– – – – –) evolution for a methane-air-NO mixture. Initial conditions: XCH4=1000 ppm, XNO = 500 ppm, sc = 0.21, XN2=0.79, T = 1000 K, P = 100 bar.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

XNO2 evolution in the absence of: O2 (); NO (); CH4 ()

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Effect of CH4 concentration on NO2/NOx (———) and XCH4 (– – – – –) evolution. Initial conditions: XO2=0.1, XNO = 700 ppm, XN2=0.75, XCO2=0.05, XH2O=0.1, T = 1000 K, P = 100 bar.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Effect of temperature on NO2/NOx (———) and XCH4 (––– – –) evolution predicted by Glarborg mechanism. Initial conditions: XCH4=1000 ppm, XO2=0.1, XNO = 700 ppm, XN2=0.75,XCO2=0.05, XH2O=0.1, P = 100 bar.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Effect of temperature on NO2/NOx (———) and XCH4 (––– – –) evolution predicted by GRI-3.0 mechanism. Initial conditions: XCH4=1000 ppm, XO2=0.1, XNO = 700 ppm, XN2=0.75, XCO2=0.05, XH2O=0.1, P = 100 bar.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Reaction path diagram during NO2 formation. Left: Glarborg mechanism; right: GRI-3.0 mechanism.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Man DF test engine exhaust duct

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Comparison of measured and simulated “NO2,” “NO,” “CH4,” and “CO” mole fraction in exhaust duct at full load

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Comparison of measured and simulated NO2 formation in exhaust duct at partial load

Tables

Errata

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In