0
Research Papers

In-Cylinder CO2 Sampling Using Skip-Firing Method

[+] Author and Article Information
Matthew Duckhouse

Cambustion Ltd.,
Unit J6, The Paddocks,
347 Cherry Hinton Road,
Cambridge, Cambridgeshire CB1 8DH, UK
e-mail: mpd18@imperial.ac.uk

Mark Peckham

Cambustion Ltd.,
Unit J6, The Paddocks,
347 Cherry Hinton Road,
Cambridge, Cambridgeshire CB1 8DH, UK
e-mail: msp@cambustion.com

Byron Mason

Department of Aeronautical and
Automotive Engineering,
Loughborough University,
Loughborough, Leicestershire LE11 3TU, UK
e-mail: b.mason2@lboro.ac.uk

Edward Winward

Department of Aeronautical and
Automotive Engineering,
Stuart Miller Building,
Loughborough University,
Loughborough, Leicestershire LE11 3TU, UK
e-mail: e.winward@lboro.ac.uk

Matthew Hammond

Cambustion Ltd.,
Unit J6, The Paddocks,
347 Cherry Hinton Road,
Cambridge, Cambridgeshire CB1 8DH, UK
e-mail: mhammond@cambustion.com

1Present address: Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, London SW7 2AZ, UK.

2Corresponding author.

Manuscript received March 18, 2019; final manuscript received April 1, 2019; published online April 25, 2019. Editor: Jerzy T. Sawicki.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 141(8), 081018 (Apr 25, 2019) (13 pages) Paper No: GTP-19-1135; doi: 10.1115/1.4043396 History: Received March 18, 2019; Revised April 01, 2019

Skip-firing (or cylinder de-activation) was assessed as a method of sampling CO2 directly in the cylinder at higher speeds than previously possible. CO2 was directly sampled from one cylinder of a 1 L three-cylinder gasoline engine to determine the residual gas fraction (RGF) using a fast response CO/CO2 analyzer. Acquisition of data for similar measurements is typically limited to engine speeds of below 1300  revolutions per minute (rpm) to allow full resolution of the sample through the analyzer that has an 8 ms finite response time. In order to sample in-cylinder CO2 at higher engine speeds, a skip-firing method is developed. By shutting off ignition intermittently during engine operation, the residual CO2 from the last firing cycle can be measured at significantly higher engine speeds. Comparison of RGF CO2 at low speeds for normal and skip-fire operation shows good correlation. This suggests that skip-firing is a suitable method for directly measuring internal exhaust gas recirculation up to at least 3000 rpm. The measurements obtained may provide a useful tool for validating internal exhaust gas recirculation models and could be used to calculate combustion air–fuel ratio from the CO and CO2 content of the burned gas. These are typically complicated parameters to predict due to the slow response time and sensitivity to hydrocarbons of wide-band oxygen sensors. A differing pattern of RGF change with increasing speed was seen between normal and skip-fire operation.

Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Prucka, R. , Filip, Z. , Hagena, J. , and Assanis, D. , 2012, “ Cycle-by-Cycle Air-to-Fuel Ratio Calculation During Transient Engine Operation Using Fast Response CO and CO2 Sensors,” ASME Paper No. ICEF2012-92094.
Shayler, P. , Davies, M. , Durrant, A. , and Keogh, P. , 1997, “ Interpreting UEGO Sensor Measurements of Mixture AFR,” Sixth International EAEC Congress–Conference IV Advanced Automotive Electronics, Cernobbio, Italy, July 2–4, ATA Paper No. 97A2IV35.
Chen, R. , Milovanovic, N. , Turner, J. , and Blundell, D. , 2003, “ The Thermal Effect of Internal Exhaust Gas Recirculation on Controlled Auto Ignition,” SAE Paper No. 2003-01-0751.
Schwoerer, J. , Dodi, S. , Fox, M. , Huang, S. , and Yang, Z. , 2004, “ Internal EGR Systems for NOx Emission Reduction in Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines,” SAE Paper No. 2004-01-1315.
Buglass, J. , Morgan, T. , and Graupner, J. , 1998, “ Interactions Between Exhaust Gas Composition and Oxygen Sensor Performance,” SAE Paper No. 982646.
Zhang, Y. , Zhao, H. , Peckham, M. , and Campbell, B. , 2013, “ Direct In-Cylinder CO2 Measurements of Residual Gas in a GDI Engine for Model Validation and HCCI Combustion Development,” SAE Paper No. 2013-01-1654.
Peckham, M. , Campbell, B. , and Finch, A. , 2011, “ Measurement of the Effects of EGR Delay on the NOx Emissions Within a Turbo-Charged Passenger Diesel Engine,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part D, 225(9), pp. 1156–1166. [CrossRef]
Duckhouse, M. , Peckham, M. , Campbell, B. , Finch, A. , and Dunnett, J. , 2016–11, A Study of “Off-Cycle” Emissions From a Euro 6 GDI Vehicle, Aachen Colloquium, Bejing, China.
Blanco-Rodriguez, D. , 2014, “ Modelling and Observation of Exhaust Gas Concentrations for Diesel Engine Control,” Chapter 2: Exhaust Gas Concentrations Estimation in Diesel Engines, Springer, Berlin.
Daintith, J. , 2008, A Dictionary of Chemistry, 6th ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
Riegel, J. , Neumann, H. , and Wiedenmann, H.-M. , 2002, “ Exhaust Gas Sensors for Automotive Emission Control,” Robert Bosch GmbH, Solid State Ion., 152–153, pp. 783–800. [CrossRef]
Fischer, H. , and Brereton, G. , 1997, “ Fuel Injection Strategies to Minimize Cold-Start HC Emission,” SAE Paper No. 970040.
Duckhouse, M. , Peckham, M. , Bradley, H. , Irwin, M. , and Hammond, M. , 2018, “ On Board Fast Measurement of Vehicle NOx Emissions,” SAE Paper No. 2018-01-0646.
Hedinger, R. , Elbert, P. , and Onder, C. , 2017, “ Optimal Cold-Start Control of a Gasoline Engine,” Energies, 10(10), p. 1548. [CrossRef]
Davis, P. , and Peckham, M. , 2006, “ Measurement of Cycle-by-Cycle AFR Using a Fast Response NDIR Analyser for Cold Start Fuelling Calibration Applications,” SAE Paper No. 2006-01-1515.
Li, L. , Yu, S. , Dong, G. , and Zhang, Y. , 2009, “ Characteristics of Three-Way Catalyst During Quickly Start-Up Process in a PFI Engine for HEV Application,” SAE Paper No. 2009-01-1325.
Easter, J. , and Bohac, S. , 2016, “ TWC-SCR Aftertreatment System Evaluation for a Lean Burn Gasoline Engine Operating in HCCI, SACI, and SI Combustion Modes,” ASME Paper No. ICEF2016-9441.
Kakuhou, A. , Urushihara, T. , Itoh, T. , and Takagi, Y. , 1999, “ Characteristics of Mixture Formation in a Direct Injection SI Engine With Optimized In-Cylinder Swirl Air Motion,” SAE Paper No. 1999-01-0505.
Wilcutts, M. , Switkes, J. , Shost, M. , and Tripathi, A. , 2013, “ Design and Benefits of Dynamic Skip Fire Strategies for Cylinder Deactivated Engines,” SAE Int. J. Engines, 6(1), pp. 278–288. [CrossRef]
Serrano, J. , Routledge, G. , Lo, N. , Shost, M. , Srinivasan, V. , and Ghosh, B. , 2014, “ Methods of Evaluating and Mitigating NVH When Operating an Engine in Dynamic Skip Fire,” SAE Int. J. Engines, 7(3), pp. 1489–1501. [CrossRef]
Cambustion, 2017, “ NDIR500 Fast CO & CO2 Analyser,” Cambustion Limited, Cambridge, UK, accessed Apr. 13, 2019, https://www.cambustion.com/products/ndir500

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of cambustion NDIR500 sampling system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Example of in-cylinder CO2 showing residual gas [1]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Schematic showing a sample probe fitted to a modified spark plug

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Photograph of sample head with probe fitted to engine

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Photograph of sample probe fitted to modified spark plug

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Photograph of probe tip located at spark plug electrode

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

In-cylinder CO2 trace showing peak and residual levels

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Plot of cylinder pressure and in-cylinder CO2 at 1100 rpm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Plot of all RGF values for several tests

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

RGF against engine speed at same engine load

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Raw CO2 values at varying engine speeds

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

RGF against load at various engine speeds

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Plot of cylinder pressure and in-cylinder CO2 at 2900 rpm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Evidence of RGF variability at higher engine speeds

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Timing diagram of ignition (I) and nonignition (N) modes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Plot showing skip-firing technique

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Plot showing one skip fire result at 3000 rpm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Comparison of normal versus skip fire operation RGF at low speed

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Comparison of normal versus skip fire operation RGF at high speed

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

Comparison of normal versus skip fire operation RGF

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 21

Raw CO2 values at varying engine speeds when skip-firing

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 22

Plot of skip-fire RGF at different loads

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 23

Raw CO2 values at different skip-fire speed points varying load

Tables

Errata

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In