A new custom-built universal biaxial testing device (UBTD) is introduced and successfully used to investigate the response of aluminum honeycomb under various combinations of large shear and compressive strains in its tubular direction. At the macroscopic level, different characteristic regimes are identified in the measured shear and normal stress-strain curves: elastic I, elastic II, nucleation, softening, and crushing. The first elastic regime shows a conventional linear elastic response, whereas the second elastic regime is nonlinear due to the generation of elastic buckles in the honeycomb microstructure. Nucleation is the point at which the cellular structure loses its load carrying capacity as a result of plastic collapse. It precedes a rapid drop of stress levels in the softening regime as pronounced plastic collapse bands emerge in the microstructure. Formation and growth of plastic folds dominate the microstructural response in the crushing phase. The mechanical features of this phase are long stress plateaus for both the corresponding shear and compressive stress-strain curves. Based on these observations, honeycomb plasticity is established by making analogies of plastic hinge lines and folding systems in the cellular microstructure with dislocations and slip line systems in a solid lattice, respectively. The initial yield surface is found to take the form of an ellipse in stress space, while the crushing behavior is described by a linear envelope along with a nonassociated flow rule based on total strain increments.

1.
Allen, H. G., 1969, Analysis and Design of Structural Sandwich Panels, Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK.
2.
Mohr
,
D.
, and
Wierzbicki
,
T.
,
2003
, “
Shear Folding of Soft-Core Sandwich Profiles
,”
Int. J. Mech. Sci.
,
45
(
2
), pp.
253
271
.
3.
Gibson, L. J., and Ashby, M. F., 1997, Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties, 2nd Ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
4.
Klintworth
,
J. W.
, and
Stronge
,
W. J.
,
1988
, “
Elasto-Plastic Yield Limits and Deformation Laws for Transversely Crushed Honeycombs
,”
Int. J. Mech. Sci.
,
30
, pp.
273
292
.
5.
Papka
,
S. D.
, and
Kyriakides
,
S.
,
1999
, “
Biaxial Crushing of Honeycombs—Part II: Analysis
,”
Int. J. Solids Struct.
,
36
(
29
), pp.
4397
4423
.
6.
McFarland
,
R. K.
,
1963
, “
Hexagonal Cell Structure Under Post-Buckling Axial Load
,”
AIAA J.
,
1
, pp.
1380
1385
.
7.
Wierzbicki
,
T.
,
1983
, “
A Crushing Analysis of Metal Honeycomb
,”
Int. J. Impact Eng.
,
1
, pp.
157
174
.
8.
Hexcel, 1997, private communication.
9.
Wierzbicki, T., 1997, “Experimental, Numerical, and Analytical Study of Honeycomb Material,” Report No. 1, Impact and Crashworthiness Laboratory, MIT.
10.
Petras
,
A.
, and
Sutcliffe
,
M. P. F.
,
2000
, “
Indentation Failure Analysis of Sandwich Beams
,”
Composite Structures
,
50
(
3
), pp.
311
318
.
11.
Mohr
,
D.
, and
Doyoyo
,
M.
,
2002
, “
Analysis of the Arcan Apparatus in the Clamped Configuration
,”
J. Compos. Mater.
,
36
(
22
), pp.
2583
2594
.
12.
Mohr
,
D.
, and
Doyoyo
,
M.
,
2003
, “
A New Method for the Biaxial Testing of Cellular Solids
,”
Exp. Mech.
,
43
(
2
), pp.
173
182
.
13.
Doyoyo
,
M.
, and
Mohr
,
D.
,
2003
, “
Microstructural Response of Aluminum Honeycomb to Combined Out-of-Plane Loading
,”
Mech. Mater.
,
35
(
9
), pp.
865
876
.
14.
Mohr
,
D.
, and
Doyoyo
,
M.
,
2003
, “
Nucleation and Propagation of Plastic Collapse Bands in Aluminum Honeycomb
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
,
94
(
4
), pp.
2262
2270
.
15.
Franc¸ois, D., Pineau, A., and Zaoui, A., 1998, Mechanical Behavior of Materials, Volume I: Elasticity and Plasticity, Kluwer, Dordrechet, The Netherlands.
16.
Henn, S., 2004, “Development of a Material Model for the Crack Inititation in Cast Aluminum Alloys Under Monotonic Loading,” Ph.D. thesis, BMW Munich, in prepartation.
17.
Kelsey
,
S.
,
Gellatly
,
R. A.
, and
Clark
,
B. W.
,
1958
, “
The Shear Modulus of Foil Honeycomb Cores
,”
Aircr. Eng.
,
30
, pp.
294
302
.
18.
von Ka´rma´n
,
T.
,
Sechler
,
E. E.
, and
Donnell
,
L. H.
,
1932
, “
The Strength of Thin Plates in Compression
,”
Trans. ASME
,
54
, pp.
53
63
.
19.
Wierzbicki
,
T.
, and
Abramowicz
,
W.
,
1983
, “
On the Crushing Mechanics of Thin-Walled Structures
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
,
50
, pp.
727
739
.
20.
Alexander
,
J. M.
,
1960
, “
An Approximative Analysis of the Collapse of Thin Cylindrical Shell Under Axial Loading
,”
Q. J. Mech. Appl. Math.
,
13
(
1
), pp.
10
15
.
21.
Mohr, D., and Doyoyo, M., 2004, “Deformation-Induced Folding Systmes in Thin-Walled Monolithic Hexagonal Metallic Honeycomb Under Multi-axial Loading,” Int. J. Solids Struct., in press.
22.
Arcan
,
M.
,
Hashin
,
Z.
, and
Voloshin
,
A.
,
1978
, “
A Method to Produce Uniform Plane-Stress States With Applications to Fiber-Reinforced Materials
,”
Exp. Mech.
,
18
, pp.
141
146
.
23.
ASTM C273, 1994, “Standard Test Method for Shear Properties of Sandwich Core Materials,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards.
You do not currently have access to this content.