The goal of this work was to quantify the improvement in the fatigue limit of solid structures which have undergone shot peening (SP) by small rigid particles. The work was based on Melan’s shakedown theorem for estimating the allowable safe stress amplitude (in a lower bound sense) of structures that otherwise might fail during fatigue loading by plastic strain accumulation (ratcheting). Aided by geometrical simplification (mainly by assuming that the residual craters of the peened surfaces are shallow and flat), the benefit of SP to increase fatigue limits of structures subjected to fluctuating loads was quantified and compared to experiments. As a by-product, the long-time accepted empirical formulas for decreasing fatigue limits due to an increase of the loading mean tensile stress (Gerber, 1874, Z Bayer Arch Ingenieur-Vereins, 6, pp. 101–110; Goodman, 1899, Mechanics Applied to Engineering, Longmans, Green, London) have received a theoretical justification from shakedown analysis. The suggested empiricism-free solution traces well Gerber and Goodman’s empirical formulas in the positive mean stress regime of the applied load. It has a notable advantage that it also smoothly extends to the negative mean-stress regime (akin to the superimposed residual compressive stresses in a thin layer generated by the SP process) not covered hitherto by formulas. This shakedown analysis manifests the merit of shot peening processes by showing specifically the existence of larger range of fatigue-safe stress amplitudes (or equivalently, exhibiting a prolonged fatigue life) before disruption by ratcheting. Various fatigue experiments which were found in the open literature, are in a satisfactory agreement with the theoretical analysis.

1.
Timoshenko
,
S.
, and
Goodier
,
J. N.
, 1951,
Theory of Elasticity
,
McGraw-Hill
, New York.
2.
Broek
,
D.
, 1988,
The Practical Use of Fracture Mechanics
,
Kluwer Academic
, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
3.
Anonymous, 1989, “Shot Peening of Metal Parts,” Military Specification, MIL-S-13165C.
4.
Melan
,
E.
, 1936, “
Theorie statisch unbestimmter Systeme aus idealplastischem Baustoff
,”
Sitzungsbericht der Akademie der Wissenschaften (Wien) Abt. IIa
,
145
, pp.
195
218
.
5.
Dvorak
,
G. J.
, and
Tarn
,
J. Q.
, 1975, “
Fatigue and shakedown in metal matrix composite
,” in
Fatigue of Composite Materials, ASTM, STP 569
,
ASTM
, West Conshohocken, PA, pp.
145
168
.
6.
Ponter
,
A. R. S
, and
Engelhardt
,
M.
, 2000, “
Shakedown Limits for a General Yield Condition: Implementation and Application for a Von Mises Yield Condition
,”
Eur. J. Mech. A/Solids
0997-7538,
19
, pp.
423
425
.
7.
Ponter
,
A. R. S.
, and
Karadeniz
,
S.
, 1985, “
An Extended Shakedown Theory for Structures that Suffer Cyclic Thermal Loading. 1-Theory
,”
ASME Trans. J. Appl. Mech.
0021-8936,
52
, pp.
877
882
.
8.
Kapoor
,
A.
, and
Johnson
,
K. L.
, 1994, “
Plastic Ratcheting as a Mechanism of Metallic Wear
,”
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
1364-5021,
445
, pp.
367
381
.
9.
Tirosh
,
J.
, 1998, “
On the Shakedown Conditions for Dilute Reinforced Composite
,”
J. Mech. Phys. Solids
0022-5096,
46
, pp.
167
185
.
10.
Polizzotto
,
C.
, 1993, “
On the Conditions to Prevent Plastic Shakedown of Structures. I. Theory
,”
ASME Trans. J. Appl. Mech.
0021-8936,
60
, pp.
15
19
; 20–25.
11.
Polizzott
,
C.
, 1993, “
A Study on Plastic Shakedown of Structures: I-Basic Properties
,”
ASME Trans. J. Appl. Mech.
0021-8936,
60
, pp.
318
323
; 324–330.
12.
Gerber
,
H.
, 1874, “
bestimungm der Zulassigen Spannungen in Eisenkonstructionen
,”
Z Bayer Arch Ingenieur-Vereins
,
6
, pp.
101
110
.
13.
Goodman
,
J. M
, 1899,
Mechanics Applied to Engineering
,
Longmans
, Green.
14.
Al-Obaid
,
Y. F.
, 1990, “
A Rudamentary Analysis of Improving Fatigue Life of Metals by Shot-Peening
,”
ASME Trans. J. Appl. Mech.
0021-8936,
57
, pp.
307
312
.
15.
Hammond
,
D. W.
, and
Meguid
,
S. A.
, 1990, “
Crack Propagation in the Presence of Shot-Peening Residual Stress
,”
Eng. Fract. Mech.
0013-7944,
37
(
2
), pp.
373
387
.
16.
Tirosh
,
J.
, and
Peles
,
S.
, 2001, “
Bounds on the Fatigue Threshold in Metals
,”
J. Mech. Phys. Solids
0022-5096,
49
, pp.
1301
1322
.
17.
Bower
,
A. F.
,
Fleck
,
N. A.
,
Needleman
,
A.
, and
Ogbonna
,
N.
, 1993, “
Indentation of a Power Law Creeping Solid
,”
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
1364-5021,
441
, pp.
97
124
.
18.
Johnson
,
K. L.
, 1985,
Contact Mechanics
,
Cambridge University Press
, New York.
19.
Muskhelishvili
,
N. I.
, 1963,
Some Basic Problems of the Mathematical Theory of Elasticity
,
P. Noordhoff Ltd.
, Groningen, The Netherlands.
20.
Kobayashi
,
M.
,
Matzui
,
T.
, and
Murakami
,
Y.
, 1998, “
Mechanism of Creation of Compressive Residual Stress by Shot Peening
,”
Int. J. Fatigue
0142-1123,
20
(
5
), pp.
351
357
.
21.
Eshelby
,
J. D.
, 1957, “
The Determination of the Elastic Field of an Ellipsoidal Inclusion
,”
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
1364-5021,
A241
, pp.
376
386
.
22.
Dowling
,
N. E.
, 1999,
Mechanical Behavior of Materials
,
Prentice-Hall
,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ
.
You do not currently have access to this content.