This study addresses the topic of the spatial variation of seismic ground motions as evaluated from data recorded at dense instrument arrays. It concentrates on the stochastic description of the spatial variation, and focuses on spatial coherency. The estimation of coherency from recorded data and its interpretation are presented. Some empirical and semi-empirical coherency models are described, and their validity and limitations in terms of physical causes discussed. An alternative approach that views the spatial variation of seismic motions as deviations in amplitudes and phases of the recorded data around a coherent approximation of the seismic motions is described. Simulation techniques for the generation of artificial spatially variable seismic ground motions are also presented and compared. The effect of coherency on the seismic response of extended structures is highlighted. This review article includes 133 references.

1.
Saxena V, Deodatis G, and Shinozuka M (2000), Effect of spatial variation of earthquake ground motion on the nonlinear dynamic response of highway bridges, Proc of 12th World Conf on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand.
2.
Berrah
MK
and
Kausel
E
(
1993
),
A modal combination rule for spatially varying seismic motions
,
Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn.
22
,
791
800
.
3.
Der Kiureghian A, Keshishian P, and Hakobian A (1997), Multiple support response spectrum analysis of bridges including the site response effect and the MSRS code, Earthquake Engineering Research Center Report No. UCB/EERC-97/02, Univ of California, Berkeley CA.
4.
Der Kiureghian
A
and
Neuenhofer
A
(
1992
),
Response spectrum method for multiple support seismic excitation
,
Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn.
21
,
713
740
.
5.
Zerva
A
(
1992
),
Seismic loads predicted by spatial variability models
,
Struct. Safety
11
,
227
243
.
6.
Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, (1999) Research needs emerging from recent earthquakes, Recommendations from a Workshop organized by the Earthquake Engineering Research Institute for the National Science Foundation, EERI, San Francisco CA.
7.
Abrahamson NA (1993), Spatial variation of multiple supports inputs, Proc of 1st US Seminar on Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Steel Bridges, A Caltrans and Univ. of California at Berkeley Seminar, San Francisco CA.
8.
Deodatis G, Saxena V, and Shinozuka M (2000), Effect of Spatial Variability of Ground Motion on Bridge Fragility Curves, Proc of 8th Specialty Conf on Probabilistic Mechanics and Structural Reliability, Univ of Notre Dame, IN.
9.
Kanda K (2000), Seismic responses of structures subjected to incident incoherent waves considering a layered media with irregular interfaces, Proc of 12th World Conf on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand.
10.
Na´prstek J and Fischer C (2000), Analysis of non-stationary response of structures due to seismic random processes of evolutionary type, Proc of 12th World Conf on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand.
11.
Bogdanoff
JL
,
Goldberg
JE
, and
Schiff
AJ
(
1965
),
The effect of ground transmission time on the response of long structures
,
Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.
55
,
627
640
.
12.
Nelson I and Weidlinger P (1977), Development of interference response spectra for lifelines seismic analysis, Grant Report No. 2, Weidlinger Associates, New York.
13.
Sandi H (1970), Conventional seismic forces corresponding to non-synchronous ground motion, Proc of 3rd European Symp Earthquake Engineering, Sofia, Bulgaria.
14.
Spudich
P
and
Cranswick
E
(
1984
),
Direct observation of rupture propagation during the 1979 Imperial Valley earthquake using a short baseline accelerometer array
,
Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.
74
,
2083
2114
.
15.
Bolt BA, Loh CH, Penzien J, Tsai YB, and Yeh YT (1982), Preliminary report on the SMART-1 strong motion array in Taiwan, Earthquake Engineering Research Center Report No. UCB/EERC-82/13, Univ of California, Berkeley CA.
16.
Harada T (1984), Probabilistic modeling of spatial variation of strong earthquake ground displacement, Proc of 8th World Conf on Earthquake Engineering, San Francisco CA.
17.
Loh
CH
,
Penzien
J
, and
Tsai
YB
(
1982
),
Engineering Analysis of SMART-1 array accelerograms
,
Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn.
10
,
575
591
.
18.
Abrahamson
NA
,
Bolt
BA
,
Darragh
RB
,
Penzien
J
, and
Tsai
YB
(
1987
),
The SMART-1 accelerograph array (1980-1987): A review
,
Earthquake Spectra
3
,
263
287
.
19.
Abrahamson
NA
,
Schneider
JF
, and
Stepp
JC
(
1991
),
Empirical spatial coherency functions for applications to soil-structure interaction analyses
,
Earthquake Spectra
7
,
1
27
.
20.
Schneider JF, Stepp JC, and Abrahamson NA (1992), The spatial variation of earthquake ground motion and effects of local site conditions, Proc of 10th World Conf on Earthquake Engineering, Madrid, Spain.
21.
Spudich
P
,
Hellweg
M
, and
Lee
WHK
(
1996
),
Directional topographic site response at Tarzana observed in aftershocks of the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake: Implications for main shock motions
,
Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.
86
,
193
208
.
22.
Meremonte
M
,
Frankel
A
,
Cranswick
E
,
Carver
D
, and
Worly
D
(
1996
),
Urban Seismology-Northridge aftershocks recorded by multi-scale arrays of portable digital seismographs
,
Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.
86
,
1350
1363
.
23.
Frankel
A
,
Hough
S
,
Friberg
P
, and
Busby
R
(
1991
),
Observations of Loma Prieta aftershocks from a dense array in Sunnyvale, California
Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.
81
,
1900
1922
.
24.
Katayama
T
(
1991
),
Use of dense array data in the determination of engineering properties of strong motions
,
Struct. Safety
10
,
27
51
.
25.
Nechtschein S, Bard PY, Gariel JC, Meneroud JP, Dervin P, Cushing M, Gaubert C, Vidal S, and Duval AM (1995), A topographic effect study in the Nice Region, Proc of 5th Int Conf on Seismic Zonation, Nice, France.
26.
Pitilakis K, Hatzidimitriou D, Bard PY, Manos G, and Jongmans D (1994), Euroseistest, Volvi, Thessaloniki: a European test site for engineering seismology, earthquake engineering and seismology, Proc of 2nd Int Conf on Earthquake Resistant Design, Berlin, Germany.
27.
Bongiovanni G, Marsan P, and Romeo RW (1995), Combined geological and geophysical investigations for site effect analysis in seismic zoning perspective, Proc of 5th Int Conf on Seismic Zonation, Nice, France.
28.
Zerva A (2000), Spatial Variability of Seismic Motions Recorded Over Extended Ground Surface Areas, Wave Motion in Earthquake Engineering, E Kausel and GD Manolis (eds), Volume in the Series Advances in Earthquake Engineering, WIT Press.
29.
Harichandran
RS
(
1991
),
Estimating the spatial variation of earthquake ground motion from dense array recordings
,
Struct. Safety
10
,
219
233
.
30.
Jenkins GW and Watts DG (1969), Spectral Analysis and Its Applications, Holden-Day, San Francisco CA.
31.
Kanai
K
(
1957
),
Semi-empirical formula for the seismic characteristics of the ground
,
Bull. of Earthquake Research Inst.
, Univ of Tokyo, Japan,
35
,
309
325
.
32.
Tajimi H (1960), A statistical method of determining the maximum response of a building structure during an earthquake, Proc of 2nd World Conf on Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo and Kyoto, Japan.
33.
Clough RW and Penzien J (1975), Dynamics of Structures, McGraw-Hill, New York.
34.
Hindy
A
and
Novak
M
(
1980
),
Response of pipelines to random ground motion
,
J. Eng. Mech. Div.
106
,
339
360
.
35.
Ellingwood BR and Batts ME (1982), Characterization of earthquake forces for probability-based design of nuclear structures, Tech Report BNL-NUREG-51587, NUREG/CR-2945, Dept of Nuclear Energy, Brookhaven National Lab, NY.
36.
Joyner WB and Boore DM (1988), Measurement, characterization and prediction of strong ground motion, Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics II-Recent Advances in Ground Motion Evaluation, JL Von Thun (ed), Geotechnical Special Pub No. 20, ASCE, New York.
37.
Harichandran
RS
and
Vanmarcke
EH
(
1986
),
Stochastic variation of earthquake ground motion in space and time
,
J. Eng. Mech. Div.
112
,
154
174
.
38.
Vanmarcke EH (1983), Random Fields. Analysis and Synthesis, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
39.
Spudich P and Oppenheimer D (1986), Dense seismograph array observations of earthquake rupture dynamics, Earthquake Source Mechanics, Geophysical Monograph 37, S Das, J Boatwright, and CH Scholz (eds), American Geophysical Union, Washington DC.
40.
Newland DE (1984), An Introduction to Random Vibrations and Spectral Analysis, Longman Inc, New York.
41.
Spudich P (1994), Recent seismological insights into the spatial variation of earthquake ground motions, New Developments in Earthquake Ground Motion Estimation and Implications for Engineering Design Practice, ATC 35-1.
42.
Abrahamson NA (1992), Generation of spatially incoherent strong motion time histories, Proc of 10th World Conf on Earthquake Engineering, Madrid, Spain.
43.
Zerva A and Beck JL (1999), Updating stochastic models for spatially variable seismic ground motions, Proc of Int Conf on Applications of Statistics and Probability, ICASP⋅8, Sydney, Australia.
44.
Abrahamson NA and Schneider J (1988), Spatial coherency of shear waves from the lotung large-scale seismic experiment, Proc of Int Workshop on Spatial Variation of Earthquake Ground Motion, Princeton Univ, Dunwalke NJ.
45.
Bard PY (1995), Seismic input motion for large structures, 18ieme Seminaire Regional Europeen de Ge´nie Parasismique, Ecole Centrale de Lyon, France.
46.
Hoshiya
M
and
Ishii
K
(
1983
),
Evaluation of kinematic interaction of soil-foundation systems by a stochastic model
,
Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng.
2
,
128
134
.
47.
Ramadan O and Novak M (1993), Coherency functions for spatially correlated seismic ground motions, Geotechnical Research Center Report No. GEOT-9-93, Univ of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
48.
O’Rourke
MJ
,
Castro
G
, and
Centola
N
(
1980
),
Effects of seismic wave propagation upon buried pipelines
,
Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn.
8
,
455
467
.
49.
Abrahamson NA and Bolt BA (1987), Array analysis and synthesis mapping of strong seismic motion, Seismic Strong Motion Synthetics, BA Bolt (ed), Academic Press Inc.
50.
Capon
J
(
1969
),
High-resolution frequency-wavenumber spectrum analysis
,
Proc. IEEE
57
,
1408
1418
.
51.
Goldstein
P
and
Archuleta
RJ
(
1991
),
Deterministic frequency-wavenumber methods and direct measurements of rupture propagation during earthquakes using a dense array: Theory and methods
,
J. Geophys. Res
96
,
6173
6185
.
52.
Goldstein
P
and
Archuleta
RJ
(
1991
),
Deterministic frequency-wavenumber methods and direct measurements of rupture propagation during earthquakes using a dense array: Data Analysis
,
J. Geophys. Res.
96
,
6187
6198
.
53.
Zerva
A
and
Zhang
O
(
1996
),
Estimation of signal characteristics in seismic ground motions
,
Probab. Eng. Mech.
11
,
229
242
.
54.
Boissie`res
HP
and
Vanmarcke
EH
(
1995
),
Estimation of lags for a seismograph array: wave propagation and composite correlation
,
Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng.
14
,
5
22
.
55.
Harichandran RS (1988), Local spatial variation of earthquake ground motion, Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics II-Recent Advances in Ground Motion Evaluation, JL Von Thun (ed), Geotechnical Special Pub No 20, ASCE, New York.
56.
Rothman
DH
(
1985
),
Nonlinear inversion, statistical mechanics, and residual statics estimation
,
Geophysics
50
,
2784
2796
.
57.
Rothman
DH
(
1986
),
Automatic estimation of large residual statics corrections
,
Geophysics
51
,
332
346
.
58.
Der Kiureghian
A
(
1996
),
A coherency model for spatially varying ground motions
,
Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn.
25
,
99
111
.
59.
Novak M and Hindy A (1979), Seismic response of buried pipelines, 3rd Canadian Conf on Earthquake Engineering, Montreal Canada.
60.
Werner SD and Lee LC (1979), The three-dimensional response of structures subjected to traveling wave excitation, Proc of 2nd US-Natl Conf on Earthquake Engineering, Stanford CA.
61.
Bogdanoff
JL
,
Goldberg
JE
, and
Bernard
MC
(
1961
),
Response of a simple structure to a random earthquake-type disturbance
,
Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.
51
,
293
310
.
62.
Loh
CH
(
1985
),
Analysis of the spatial variation of seismic waves and ground movements from SMART-1 data
,
Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn.
13
,
561
581
.
63.
Loh
CH
and
Yeh
YT
(
1988
),
Spatial variation and stochastic modeling of seismic differential ground movement
,
Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn.
16
,
583
596
.
64.
Loh
CH
and
Lin
SG
(
1990
),
Directionality and simulation in spatial variation of seismic waves
,
Eng. Struct.
12
,
134
143
.
65.
Hao
H
,
Oliveira
CS
, and
Penzien
J
(
1989
),
Multiple-station ground motion processing and simulation based on SMART-1 array data
,
Nucl. Eng. Des.
111
,
293
310
.
66.
Oliveira
CS
,
Hao
H
, and
Penzien
J
(
1991
),
Ground motion modeling for multiple-input structural analysis
,
Struct. Safety
10
,
79
93
.
67.
Claassen JP (1985), The estimation of seismic spatial coherence and its application to a regional event, Sandia National Lab Report SAND85-2093.
68.
Abrahamson NA, Schneider JF, and Stepp JC (1990), Spatial variation of strong ground motion for use in soil-structure interaction analyses, Proc of 4th US-Natl Conf on Earthquake Engineering, Palm Springs CA, 317–326.
69.
Riepl
J
,
Oliveira
CS
, and
Bard
PY
(
1997
),
Spatial coherence of seismic wave fields across an alluvial valley (weak motion
),
Journal of Seismology
1
,
253
268
.
70.
Vernon
F
,
Fletcher
J
,
Carroll
L
,
Chave
A
, and
Sembera
E
(
1991
),
Coherence of seismic body waves as measured by a small aperture array
,
J. Geophys. Res.
96
,
11981
11996
.
71.
Novak
M
(
1987
)
Discussion on Stochastic variation of earthquake ground motion in space and time by RS Harichandran and EH Vanmarcke
,
J. Eng. Mech. Div.
113
,
1267
1270
.
72.
Tokso¨z
MN
,
Dainty
AM
, and
Charrette
III
EE
(
1991
),
Spatial variation of ground motion due to lateral heterogeneity
,
Struct. Safety
10
,
53
77
.
73.
Steidl
JH
,
Tumarkin
AG
, and
Archuleta
RJ
(
1996
),
What is a reference site?
,
Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.
86
,
1733
1748
.
74.
Cranswick
E
(
1988
),
The information content of high-frequency seismograms and the near-surface geologic structure of “hard rock” recording sites
,
Pure Appl. Geophys.
128
,
333
363
.
75.
Menke
W
,
Lerner-Lam
AL
,
Dubendorff
B
, and
Pacheco
J
(
1990
),
Polarization and coherence of 5 to 30 Hz seismic wave fields at a hard rock site and their relevance to velocity heterogeneities in the crust
,
Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.
80
,
430
449
.
76.
Somerville PG, McLaren JP, Saikia CK, and Helmberger DV (1988), Site-specific estimation of spatial incoherence of strong ground motion, Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics II-Recent Advances in Ground Motion Evaluation, JL Von Thun (ed), Geotechnical Special Pub No 20, ASCE, New York.
77.
Luco
JE
and
Wong
HL
(
1986
),
Response of a rigid foundation to a spatially random ground motion
,
Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn.
14
,
891
908
.
78.
Zerva
A
(
1992
),
Seismic ground motion simulations from a class of spatial variability models
,
Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn.
21
,
351
361
.
79.
Zerva
A
(
1994
),
On the spatial variation of seismic ground motions and its effects on lifelines
,
Eng. Struct.
16
,
534
546
.
80.
Zerva
A
and
Harada
T
(
1997
),
Effect of surface layer stochasticity on seismic ground motion coherence and strain estimates
,
Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng.
16
,
445
457
.
81.
Zerva A, Ang AHS, and Wen YK (1985), Study of seismic ground motion for lifeline response analysis, Civil Engineering Studies, Structural Research Series No SRS-521, Univ of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign, Urbana IL.
82.
Zerva
A
,
Ang
AHS
, and
Wen
YK
(
1987
),
Development of differential response spectra for lifeline seismic analysis
,
Probab. Eng. Mech.
1
,
208
218
.
83.
Masri
SF
(
1976
),
Response of beams to propagating boundary excitation
,
Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn.
4
,
497
507
.
84.
Abdel-Ghaffar
AM
and
Rubin
LI
(
1982
),
Suspension bridge response to multiple support excitations
,
J. Eng. Mech. Div.
108
,
419
435
.
85.
Abdel-Ghaffar
AM
and
Nazmy
AS
(
1991
),
3D nonlinear seismic behavior of cable-stayed bridges
,
J. Struct. Eng.
117
,
3456
3476
.
86.
Harichandran
RS
and
Wang
W
(
1988
),
Response of simple beam to spatially varying earthquake excitation
,
J. Eng. Mech. Div.
114
,
1526
1541
.
87.
Harichandran
RS
and
Wang
W
(
1990
),
Response of indeterminate two-span beam to spatially varying earthquake excitation
,
Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn.
19
,
173
187
.
88.
Zerva
A
(
1988
),
Lifeline response to spatially variable ground motions
,
Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn.
16
,
361
379
.
89.
Zerva
A
(
1991
),
Effect of spatial variability and propagation of seismic ground motions on the response of multiply supported structures
,
Probab. Eng. Mech.
6
,
212
221
.
90.
Harichandran
RS
,
Hawwari
A
, and
Sweidan
BN
(
1996
),
Response of long-span bridges to spatially varying ground motion
,
Journal of Structural Engineering
122
,
476
484
.
91.
Monti
G
,
Nuti
C
, and
Pinto
PE
(
1996
),
Nonlinear response of bridges under multi-support excitation
,
Journal of Structural Engineering
122
,
1147
1159
.
92.
Zerva
A
and
Zhang
O
(
1997
),
Correlation patterns in characteristics of spatially variable seismic ground motions
,
Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn.
26
,
19
39
.
1.
Rice
SO
(
1944
),
Mathematical analysis of random noise
,
Bell Syst. Tech. J.
23
(
3
),
282
332
, and
2.
24(1), 46–156.
1.
Shinozuka
M
(
1972
),
Monte Carlo solution of structural dynamics
,
Comput. Struct.
2
,
855
874
.
2.
Conte
JP
,
Pister
KS
, and
Mahin
SA
(
1992
),
Nonstationary ARMA modeling of seismic ground motions
,
Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng.
11
,
411
426
.
3.
Ellis
GW
and
Cakmak
AS
(
1991
),
Time series modeling of strong ground motion from multiple event earthquakes
,
Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng.
10
,
42
54
.
4.
Kozin
F
(
1988
),
Auto-regressive moving-average models of earthquake records
,
Probab. Eng. Mech.
3
,
58
63
.
5.
Mignolet
MP
and
Spanos
PD
(
1992
),
Simulation of homogeneous two-dimensional random fields: Part I—AR and ARMA models
,
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
59
,
260
269
.
6.
Spanos
PD
and
Mignolet
MP
(
1992
),
Simulation of homogeneous two-dimensional random fields: Part II-MA and ARMA models
,
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
59
,
270
277
.
7.
Fenton
GA
and
Vanmarcke
EH
(
1990
),
Simulations of random fields via local average subdivision
,
J. Eng. Mech.
116
,
1733
1749
.
8.
Mantoglou A and Wilson JL (1981), Simulation of random fields with the turning bands method, Report No 264, Dept of Civil Engineering, MIT, Cambridge MA.
9.
Gurley K and Kareem A (1994), On the analysis and simulation of random processes utilizing higher order spectra and wavelet transforms, Proc of 2nd Int Conf on Computational Stochastic Mechanics, Athens, Greece.
10.
Zeldin
BA
and
Spanos
PD
(
1996
),
Random field representation and synthesis using wavelet bases
,
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
63
,
946
952
.
11.
Der Kiureghian
A
and
Crempien
J
(
1989
),
An evolutionary model for earthquake ground motion
,
Struct. Safety
6
,
235
246
.
12.
Grigoriu M, Ruiz SE, and Rosenblueth E (1988), Nonstationary models of seismic ground acceleration, Tech Report NCEER-88-0043, Natl Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo NY.
13.
Yeh
CH
and
Wen
YK
(
1990
),
Modeling of nonstationary ground motion and analysis of inelastic structural response
,
Struct. Safety
8
,
281
298
.
14.
Zerva A and Katafygiotis LS (2000), Selection of simulation scheme for the nonlinear seismic response of spatial structures, Proc of 4th Int Colloquium on Computation of Shell and Spatial Structures, IASS- IACM 2000, Chania, Greece.
15.
Katafygiotis LS, Zerva A, and Pachakis D (1999), An efficient approach for the simulation of spatially variable motions for the seismic response of lifelines, Proc of 13th ASCE Engineering Mechanics Conf, Baltimore MD.
16.
Ramadan
O
and
Novak
M
(
1993
),
Simulation of spatially incoherent random ground motions
,
J. Eng. Mech.
119
,
997
1016
.
17.
Ramadan
O
and
Novak
M
(
1994
),
Simulation of multidimensional anisotropic ground motions
,
J. Eng. Mech.
120
,
1773
1785
.
18.
Spanos
PD
and
Zeldin
BA
(
1996
),
Efficient iterative ARMA approximation of multivariate random processes for structural dynamics applications
,
Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn.
25
,
497
507
.
19.
Li
Y
and
Kareem
A
(
1991
),
Simulation of multivariate nonstationary random processes by FFT
,
J. Eng. Mech.
117
,
1037
1058
.
20.
Li
Y
and
Kareem
A
(
1997
),
Simulation of multivariate nonstationary random processes: Hybrid DFT and digital filtering approach
,
J. Eng. Mech.
123
,
1302
1310
.
21.
Jin
S
,
Lutes
LD
, and
Sarkani
S
(
1997
),
Efficient simulation of multidimensional random fields
,
J. Eng. Mech.
123
,
1082
1089
.
22.
Vanmarcke
EH
,
Heredia-Zavoni
E
, and
Fenton
GA
(
1993
),
Conditional simulation of spatially correlated earthquake ground motion
,
J. Eng. Mech.
119
,
2333
2352
.
23.
Abrahamson NA (1988), Spatial interpolation of array ground motions for engineering analysis, Proc of 9th World Conf on Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo, Japan.
24.
Fenton
GA
(
1994
),
Error evaluation of three random-field generators
,
J. Eng. Mech.
120
,
2478
2497
.
25.
Rice SO (1954), Mathematical analysis of random noise, Selected Papers on Noise and Stochastic Processes, N Wax (ed), Dover, NY, 133–294.
26.
Shinozuka
M
(
1971
),
Simulation of multivariate and multidimensional random processes
,
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
49
,
357
367
.
27.
Shinozuka
M
and
Jan
CM
(
1972
),
Digital simulation of random processes and its applications
,
J. Sound Vib.
25
,
111
128
.
28.
Shinozuka M (1987), Stochastic fields and their digital simulation, Stochastic Methods in Structural Dynamics, GI Schue¨ller and M Shinozuka (eds), Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
29.
Shinozuka
M
and
Deodatis
G
(
1991
),
Simulation of stochastic processes by spectral representation
,
Appl. Mech. Rev.
44
,
191
203
.
30.
Shinozuka
M
and
Deodatsi
G
(
1996
),
Simulation of multidimensional Gaussian stochastic fields by spectral representation
,
Appl. Mech. Rev.
49
,
29
53
.
31.
Yang
JN
(
1972
),
Simulations of random envelope processes
,
J. Sound Vib.
25
,
73
85
.
32.
Shinozuka M (1974), Digital simulation of random processes in engineering mechanics with the aid of FFT technique, Stochastic Problems in Mechanics, ST Ariaratnam and HHE Leipholz (eds), Univ of Waterloo Press.
33.
Grigoriu
M
(
1993
),
On the spectral representation method in simulation
,
Probab. Eng. Mech.
8
,
75
90
.
34.
Katafygiotis
LS
,
Zerva
A
, and
Malyarenko
AA
(
1999
),
Simulations of homogeneous and partially isotropic random fields
,
J. Eng. Mech.
125
,
1180
1189
.
1.
Lutes
LD
and
Wang
J
(
1992
),
Simulation of improved Gaussian time history
,
J. Eng. Mech.
117
,
218
224
, and
2.
Discussion by Ditlevsen O, Closure by Authors, (
1992
),
J. Eng. Mech.
,
118
,
1276
1277
.
1.
Mignolet
MP
and
Harish
MV
(
1996
),
Comparison of some simulation algorithms on basis of distribution
,
J. Eng. Mech.
122
,
172
176
.
2.
Deodatis
G
(
1996
),
Simulation of ergodic multivariate stochastic processes
,
J. Eng. Mech.
122
,
778
787
.
3.
Jennings PC, Housner GW, and Tsai NC (1968), Simulated earthquake motions, Tech Report, Earthquake Engineering Research Laboratory, California Inst of Tech, Pasadena, CA.
4.
Deodatis
G
(
1996
),
Non-stationary stochastic vector processes: seismic ground motion applications
,
Probab. Eng. Mech.
11
,
149
168
.
5.
Gasparini D and Vanmarcke EH (1976), Simulated earthquake ground motions compatible with prescribed response spectra, Tech Report No R76-4, Dept of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Inst of Tech, Cambridge MA.
You do not currently have access to this content.