A unifying description of the shared control architecture within the field of physical human–robot interaction (pHRI) facilitates the education of those being introduced to the field and the framing of new contributions to it. The authors' review of shared control within pHRI proposes such a unifying framework composed of three pillars. First, intent detection addresses the robot's interpretation of human goals, representing one-way communication. Second, arbitration manages the respective roles of the human and robot in the shared control. Third, feedback is the mechanism by which the robot returns information to the human, representing one-way communication in the opposite direction. Interpreting existing contributions through the lens of this framework brings out the importance of mechanical design, modeling, and state-based control.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
January 2018
Discussions
Discussion of “A Review of Intent Detection, Arbitration, and Communication Aspects of Shared Control for Physical Human–Robot Interaction” (Losey, D. P., McDonald, C. G., Battaglia, E., and O'Malley, M. K., 2018, ASME Appl. Mech. Rev., 70(1), p. 010804)
James P. Schmiedeler,
James P. Schmiedeler
Fellow ASME
Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering,
University of Notre Dame,
Notre Dame, IN 46556
e-mail: schmiedeler.4@nd.edu
Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering,
University of Notre Dame,
Notre Dame, IN 46556
e-mail: schmiedeler.4@nd.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Patrick M. Wensing
Patrick M. Wensing
Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering,
University of Notre Dame,
Notre Dame, IN 46556
e-mail: pwensing@nd.edu
University of Notre Dame,
Notre Dame, IN 46556
e-mail: pwensing@nd.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
James P. Schmiedeler
Fellow ASME
Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering,
University of Notre Dame,
Notre Dame, IN 46556
e-mail: schmiedeler.4@nd.edu
Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering,
University of Notre Dame,
Notre Dame, IN 46556
e-mail: schmiedeler.4@nd.edu
Patrick M. Wensing
Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering,
University of Notre Dame,
Notre Dame, IN 46556
e-mail: pwensing@nd.edu
University of Notre Dame,
Notre Dame, IN 46556
e-mail: pwensing@nd.edu
Manuscript received January 9, 2018; final manuscript received January 24, 2018; published online February 14, 2018. Editor: Harry Dankowicz.
Appl. Mech. Rev. Jan 2018, 70(1): 015503 (3 pages)
Published Online: February 14, 2018
Article history
Received:
January 9, 2018
Revised:
January 24, 2018
Connected Content
Citation
Schmiedeler, J. P., and Wensing, P. M. (February 14, 2018). "Discussion of “A Review of Intent Detection, Arbitration, and Communication Aspects of Shared Control for Physical Human–Robot Interaction” (Losey, D. P., McDonald, C. G., Battaglia, E., and O'Malley, M. K., 2018, ASME Appl. Mech. Rev., 70(1), p. 010804)." ASME. Appl. Mech. Rev. January 2018; 70(1): 015503. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4039146
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Related Articles
A Review of Intent Detection, Arbitration, and Communication Aspects of Shared Control for Physical Human–Robot Interaction
Appl. Mech. Rev (January,2018)
New 3-DOFs Hybrid Mechanism for Ankle and Wrist of Humanoid Robot: Modeling, Simulation, and Experiments
J. Mech. Des (February,2011)
Introduction of the ASME Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics
J. Mechanisms Robotics (February,2009)
A Nonlinear Stiffness Safe Joint Mechanism Design for Human Robot Interaction
J. Mech. Des (June,2010)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Mechanical Design Challenges in Rescue Robot Prototyping
Designs and Prototypes of Mobile Robots
QP Based Encoder Feedback Control
Robot Manipulator Redundancy Resolution
Is Modeling in Tribology a Useful Activity?
Tribological Modeling for Mechanical Designers