TECHNICAL PAPERS: Gas Turbines: Controls, Diagnostics, and Instrumentation

Fuzzy Logic Estimation Applied to Newton Methods for Gas Turbines

[+] Author and Article Information
Dan Martis

 Rolls-Royce Canada, 9545 Cote-de-Liesse, Dorval, Quebec H9P 1A5, Canadadan.martis@rolls-royce.com

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 129(1), 88-96 (Mar 01, 2004) (9 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2360597 History: Received October 01, 2003; Revised March 01, 2004

This method, based on fuzzy logic principles, is intended to find the most likely solution of an over-determined system, in specific conditions. The method addresses typical problems encountered in gas turbine performance analysis and, more specifically, to the alignment of a synthesis model with measured data. Generally speaking, the relatively low accuracy of measurements introduces a random noise around the true value of a performance parameter and distorts any deterministic solution of a square matrix-based linear system. The fuzzy logic estimator is able to get very close to the real solution by using additional (pseudo-redundant) parameters and by building the most likely solution based on each of the measurement accuracies. The accuracy—or “quality”—of a measurement is encapsulated within an extra dimension which is defined as fuzzy and which encompasses the whole range of values, between 0 (false) and 1 (true). The value of the method is shown in two examples. The first simulates compressor fouling, the other deals with actual engine test data following a hardware modification. Both examples experience noisy measurements. The method is stable and effective even at high level of noise. The results are within the close vicinity of the expected levels (within 0.2% accuracy) and the accuracy is about ten times lower than the noise level.

Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Normal distribution applied to measurement pj

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Input fuzzy domain—normal distribution

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Input fuzzy domain—normal distribution; scalar representation

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Intersection of uncertainty domains

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Output fuzzy domain—normal distribution

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Output fuzzy domain—normal distribution; scalar representation

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Output fuzzy domain—trapezoidal distribution

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Output fuzzy domain—trapezoidal distribution; scalar representation

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

The solution of system 13—no noise

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

System 13 with seeded noise

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

The fuzzy solution migration toward ideal solution

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Error function level versus number of measured parameters

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

Comparison of FLE and least squares error stability with increasing measurement noise



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In