Closure to “Discussion of ‘The Lomakin Effect in Annular Gas Seals Under Choked Flow Conditions’ ” (2007, ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 129 , p. 1143) PUBLIC ACCESS

[+] Author and Article Information
Mihai Arghir

 Université de Poitiers, Francemihai.arghir@lms.univ-poitiers.fr

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 129(4), 1144 (Jan 04, 2007) (1 page) doi:10.1115/1.2718219 History: Received January 03, 2007; Revised January 04, 2007

The authors are grateful for this experimental validation of the negative direct static stiffness of choked annular seals. For performing our own calculations, the mentioned conditions were supplemented by some additional assumptions that are somewhat usual for straight annular seals, namely, an imposed inlet pressure drop coefficient ζinlet and an exit recovery coefficient ζexit=1 (complete pressure recovery). The rotation speed was ω=0, and the flow regime was considered as being nonisothermal with adiabatic walls and Tinlet=20°C. Moody’s friction factor was used with the possibility of bridging transition between laminar and turbulent flow. The employed grid had 16 equally spaced cells in the axial direction and 32 in the circumferential one (Fig. 1).

The first set of results was obtained for ζinlet=0.1 and zero roughness. Results show a good prediction of the negative direct static stiffness at a pressure drop DP=18.3bar and calculations could be performed for values of >20bar. Nevertheless, the flow in the seal becomes choked at much lower pressure differences than the 10bar announced by experiments. It was further recognized that ξinlet generally varies with the axial Reynolds number (triggered by the pressure difference); thus, a variable inlet pressure drop was used in a second set of calculations, ξinlet=5.3log(Re)1. The results show a larger negative value for the direct static stiffness at DP=18.3bar but no modification of the predictions at lower pressure differences.

A third set of results was obtained by considering the variable ξinlet and a 5% roughness of the rotor and stator surfaces. The prediction for DP=18.3bar is very close to K=1.93MNm, and the values of the static stiffness obtained for low-pressure drops corresponding to nonchoked flows show a tendency toward an improvement. Nevertheless, larger values of the roughness cannot be predicted by Moody’s law.

Again, the authors are grateful for this discussion that evidenced that a choked exit flow of gas annular seals can lead to negative values of the static stiffness.

Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
View article in PDF format.




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In