Research Papers: Nuclear Power

Advanced High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor Systems

[+] Author and Article Information
Yasuyoshi Kato1

Research Laboratory for Nuclear Reactors, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1-N1-2, O-okayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8550, Japan


Present address: MCX Institute, 2-5-10-105, O-okayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-0033, Japan.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 132(1), 012902 (Oct 01, 2009) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.3098416 History: Received November 06, 2008; Revised November 06, 2008; Published October 01, 2009

Three systems have been proposed for advanced high-temperature gas-cooled reactors: a supercritical carbon dioxide (S-CO2) gas turbine power conversion system, a new microchannel heat exchanger (MCHE), and a once-through-then-out (OTTO) refueling scheme with burnable poison (BP) loading. A S-CO2 gas turbine cycle attains higher cycle efficiency than a He gas turbine cycle because of reduced compression work around the critical point of CO2. Considering temperature reduction at the turbine inlet by 30°C through intermediate heat exchange, the S-CO2 indirect cycle achieves an efficiency of 53.8% at a turbine inlet temperature of 820°C and a turbine inlet pressure of 20 MPa. This cycle efficiency value is higher by 4.5% than that (49.3%) of a He direct cycle at a turbine inlet temperature of 850°C and 7 MPa. A new MCHE has been proposed as an intermediate heat exchanger between the primary cooling He loop and the secondary S-CO2 gas turbine power conversion system and as recuperators of the S-CO2 gas turbine power conversion system. This MCHE has discontinuous “S-shaped” fins providing flow channels resembling sine curves. Its pressure drop is one-sixth that of a conventional MCHE with a zigzag flow channel configuration, but it has the same high heat transfer performance. The pressure drop reduction is ascribed to suppression of recirculation flows and eddies that appear around bend corners of the zigzag flow channels in the conventional MCHE. An optimal BP loading in an OTTO refueling scheme eliminates the shortcoming of its excessively high axial power peaking factor, reducing the power peaking factor from 4.44 to about 1.7, and inheriting advantages over the multipass scheme because it obviates reloading in addition to fuel handling and integrity checking systems. Because of the power peaking factor reduction, the maximum fuel temperatures are lower than the maximum permissible values of 1250°C for normal operation and 1600°C during a depressurization accident.

Copyright © 2010 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Partial precooling cycle configuration

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Cycle efficiencies of S-CO2 cycle and He cycle in the one-intercooler system

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Conventional zigzag model

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Zigzag model in three dimensions

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Swirl flows, eddies, and recirculation flows in a bent pipe. (From Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, “JSME Data Book, Hydraulic Losses in Pipes and Ducts,” Maruzen Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan, Fig. 4.74, p. 80.)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Velocity distributions

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Heat transfer rate versus pressure drop. Pressure drop per unit length, ΔP, heat transfer rate per unit volume, Q/V, are calculated as ΔP=(Pin-Pout)/Lx, Q/V=Q/(Lx×Ly×Lz).

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Unit cell lattice model in the MVP code

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Contour lines of initial k∞ and reactivity swing

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

k∞ change with burnup at the optimal radius and number BP particles

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Radial x-section of the pebble bed HTGR core

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

OTTO refueling model

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

Axial power distribution in the channel where power peaking appears

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 14

Maximum fuel temperature in normal operation

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 15

Maximum fuel temperature at depressurization accident



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In