Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Combustion, Fuels, and Emissions

Study of Fuel Composition Effects on Flashback Using a Confined Jet Flame Burner

[+] Author and Article Information
Vincent McDonell

e-mail: mcdonell@ucicl.uci.edu
UCI Combustion Laboratory,
University of California,
Irvine, CA 92697-3550

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received June 27, 2012; final manuscript received June 28, 2012; published online November 21, 2012. Editor: Dilip R. Ballal.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 135(1), 011502 (Nov 21, 2012) (9 pages) Paper No: GTP-12-1235; doi: 10.1115/1.4007345 History: Received June 27, 2012; Revised June 28, 2012

Flashback is the main operability issue associated with converting lean, premixed combustion systems from operation on natural gas to operation on high hydrogen content fuels. Most syngas fuels contain some amount of hydrogen (15–100%) depending on the fuel processing scheme. With this variability in the composition of syngas, the question of how fuel composition impacts flashback propensity arises. To address this question, a jet burner configuration was used to develop systematic data for a wide range of compositions under turbulent flow conditions. The burner consisted of a quartz burner tube confined by a larger quartz tube. The use of quartz allowed visualization of the flashback processes occurring. Various fuel compositions of hydrogen, carbon monoxide, and natural gas were premixed with air at equivalence ratios corresponding to constant adiabatic flame temperatures (AFT) of 1700 K and 1900 K. Once a flame was stabilized on the burner, the air flow rate would be gradually reduced while holding the AFT constant via the equivalence ratio until flashback occurred. Schlieren and intensified OH* images captured at high speeds during flashback allowed some additional understanding of what is occurring during the highly dynamic process of flashback. Confined and unconfined flashback data were analyzed by comparing data collected in the present study with existing data in the literature. A statistically designed test matrix was used which allows analysis of variance of the results to be carried out, leading to correlation between fuel composition and flame temperature with (1) critical flashback velocity gradient and (2) burner tip temperature. Using the burner tip temperature as the unburned temperature in the laminar flame speed calculations showed increased correlation of the flashback data and laminar flame speed as opposed to when the actual unburned gas temperature was used.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Lieuwen, T., Mcdonell, V., Santavicca, D., and Sattelmayer, T., 2008, “Burner Development and Operability Issues Associated With Steady Flowing Syngas Fired Combustors,” Combust. Sci. Technol., 180(6), pp. 1169–1192. [CrossRef]
Lewis, B., and Von Elbe, G., 1943, “Stability and Structure of Burner Flames,” J. Chem. Phys., 11(2), pp. 75–97. [CrossRef]
Wohl, K., 1953, “Quenching, Flash-Back, Blow-Off-Theory and Experiment,” Sym. (Int.) Combust. (Proc.), 4(1), pp. 68–89. [CrossRef]
Putnam, A. A., and Jensen, R. A., 1949, “Application of Dimensionless Numbers to Flash-Back and Other Combustion Phenomena,” Symposium on Combustion and Flame, and Explosion Phenomena, 3(1), pp. 89–98. [CrossRef]
Grumer, J., 1949, “Predicting Burner Performance With Interchanged Fuel Gases,” Ind. Eng. Chem., 41(12), pp. 2756–2761. [CrossRef]
Grumer, J., and Harris, M. E., 1952, “Flame-Stability Limits of Methane, Hydrogen, and Carbon Monoxide Mixtures,” Ind. Eng. Chem., 44(7), pp. 1547–1553. [CrossRef]
Grumer, J., Harris, M. E., and Schultz, H., 1952, “Predicting Interchangeability of Fuel Gases. Interchangeability of Oil Gases or Propane-Air Fuels With Natural Gases,” Ind. Eng. Chem., 44(7), pp. 1554–1559. [CrossRef]
Grumer, J., and Harris, M. E., 1954, “Temperature Dependence of Stability Limits of Burner Flames,” Ind. Eng. Chem., 46(11), pp. 2424–2430. [CrossRef]
Grumer, J., Harris, M. E., and Schultz, H., 1955, “Flame Stability Limits of Ethylene, Propane, Methane, Hydrogen, and Nitrogen Mixtures,” Ind. Eng. Chem., 47(9), pp. 1760–1767. [CrossRef]
Grumer, J., Harris, M. E., and Rowe, V., 1956, “Fundamental Flashback, Blow Off, and Yellow-Tip Limits of Fuel Gas-Air Mixtures,” U.S. Dept. Interior, Bureau of Mines, Washington, D.C.
Bollinger, L. E., and Edse, R., 1956, “Effect of Burner-Tip Temperature on Flash Back of Turbulent Hydrogen-Oxygen Flames,” Ind. Eng. Chem., 48(4), pp. 802–807. [CrossRef]
Fine, B., 1957, “Stability Limits and Burning Velocities for Some Laminar and Turbulent Propane and Hydrogen Flames at Reduced Pressure,” NACA—Technical Note 4031, pp. 49.
Fine, B., 1958, “Flashback of Laminar and Turbulent Burner Flames at Reduced Pressure,” Combust. Flame, 2(3), pp. 253–266. [CrossRef]
Fine, B., 1959, “Effect of Initial Temperature on Flash Back of Laminar and Turbulent Burner Flames,” Indust. Eng. Chem., 51(4), pp. 564–566. [CrossRef]
Van Krevelen, D. W., and Chermin, H. A. G., 1958, “Generalized Flame Stability Diagram for the Prediction of Interchangeability of Gases,” Sym. (Int.) Combust. (Proc.), 7(1), pp. 358–368. [CrossRef]
Caffo, E., and Padovani, C., 1963, “Flashback in Premixed Air Flames,” Combust. Flame, 7(4), pp. 331–337. [CrossRef]
Putnam, A. A., Ball, D. A., and Levy, A., 1980, “Effect of Fuel Composition on Relation of Burning Velocity to Product of Quenching Distance and Flashback Velocity Gradient,” Combust. Flame, 37, pp. 193–196. [CrossRef]
Ball, D. A., Putnam, A. A., Radhakrishman, E., and Levy, A., 1978, “Relation of Burning Velocity, Quenching Distance, and Flashback Velocity Gradient for Low and Intermediate Btu Gases,” Battelle Columbus Laboratories, Columbus, OH, Technical Report No. DOE/ET/10653-3.
Lee, S. T., and Tien, J. S., 1982, “A Numerical-Analysis of Flame Flashback in a Premixed Laminar System,” Combust. Flame, 48(3), pp. 273–285. [CrossRef]
Davu, D., Franco, R., Choudhuri, A., and Lewis, R., 2005, “Investigation on Flashback Propensity of Syngas Premixed Flames,” 41st AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Tucson, AZ, July 10–July 13, Paper No. AIAA 2005–3585.
Dam, B., Love, N., and Choudhuri, A., 2011, “Flashback Propensity of Syngas Fuels,” Fuel, 90(2), pp. 618–625. [CrossRef]
Xu, G., Tian, Y., Song, Q., Fang, A., Cui, Y., Yu, B., and Nie, C., 2006, “Flashback Limit and Mechanism of Methane and Syngas Fuel,” ASME Turbo Expo 2006: Power for Land, Sea, and Air (GT2006), Barcelona, Spain, May 6–11, ASME Paper No. GT2006-90521, pp. 445–452. [CrossRef]
Eichler, C., Baumgartner, G., and Sattelmayer, T., 2012, “Experimental Investigation of Turbulent Boundary Layer Flashback Limits for Premixed Hydrogen-Air Flames Confined in Ducts,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 134(1), p. 011502. [CrossRef]
Sequera, D., and Agrawal, A., 2008, “Visual Flame Structure of Hydrogen-Rich Flames in a Low-Swirl Burner,” 2008 Technical Meeting of the Central States Section of the Combustion Institute, Tuscaloosa, AL, April 20–22.
Wang, Q., McDonell, V., Steinthorsson, E., Mansour, A., and Hollon, B., 2009, “Correlating Flashback Tendencies for Premixed Injection of Hydrogen and Methane Mixtures at Elevated Temperature and Pressure,” ASME Paper No. GT2009-59500. pp. 401–410. [CrossRef]
Grumer, J., 1958, “Flashback and Blow Off Limits of Unpiloted Turbulent Flames,” Jet Propul., 28, pp. 756.
Yamazaki, K., and Tsuji, H., 1961, “An Experimental Investigation on the Stability of Turbulent Burner Flames,” Symp. (Int.) Combust., (Proc.), 8(1), pp. 543–553. [CrossRef]
Khitrin, L. N., Moin, P. B., Smirnov, D. B., and Shevchuk, V. U., 1965, “Peculiarities of Laminar- and Turbulent-Flame Flashbacks,” Symp. (Int.) Combust. (Proc.), 10(1), pp. 1285–1291. [CrossRef]
Schlichting, H., and Gersten, K., 2000, Boundary-Layer Theory, Springer, Berlin.
Natarajan, J., Lieuwen, T., and Seitzman, J., 2007, “Laminar Flame Speeds of H2/CO Mixtures: Effect of CO2 Dilution, Preheat Temperature, and Pressure,” Combust. Flame, 151(1-2), pp. 104–119. [CrossRef]
Hu, E., Huang, Z., He, J., Jin, C., and Zheng, J., 2009, “Experimental and Numerical Study on Laminar Burning Characteristics of Premixed Methane-Hydrogen-Air Flames,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 34(11), pp. 4876–4888. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of the axisymmetric single injector rig

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schlieren images of flashback for fuel composition of 50%/50% H2/CO flashback (no confinement)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Schlieren images of flashback for fuel composition of 100% H2 (no confinement)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Intensified OH* images of flashback for fuel composition of 100% H2 (with confinement)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Comparison of experimental flashback data for natural gas fuels from previous work and current UC Irvine Combustion Lab (UCICL) data

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Comparison of experimental flashback data from previous work and current UC Irvine Combustion Lab (UCICL) data ([23], H2-air; [27], city gas-air; [28], H2-air)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Predicted values versus actual values for the gc correlation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Predicted values versus actual values for the gc correlation collected with confined tube by Eichler et al. [23]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Injector tip temperature at flashback versus laminar flame speed

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Model prediction of injector tip temperature for AFT = 1900 K

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Model prediction of injector tip temperature for AFT = 1700 K

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Predicted values versus actual values for the tip temperature correlation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Critical velocity gradient as a function of two sets of laminar flame speeds where each set uses a different unburned gas temperature in the laminar flame speed calculation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Model prediction of critical velocity gradient for higher AFT level (1900 K)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Model prediction of critical velocity gradient for lower AFT level (1700 K)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Comparison between predicted gc and laminar flame speed for 50%/50%- H2/CO [30] and 50%/50%-H2/CH4 [31]



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In