Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Aircraft Engine

An Integrated Approach for Aircraft Engine Performance Estimation and Fault Diagnostics

[+] Author and Article Information
Donald L. Simon

NASA Glenn Research Center,
21000 Brookpark Road, MS 77-1,
Cleveland, OH 44135

Jeffrey B. Armstrong

ASRC Aerospace Corporation,
21000 Brookpark Road, MS 500-ASRC,
Cleveland, OH 44135

This decision was made in an attempt to strike a balance between the dual objectives of performance estimation and fault diagnostics. Accurate turbomachinery deterioration estimation is necessary for performance trend monitoring purposes. Conversely, from a fault isolation standpoint, accurate actuator bias estimation is secondary to the ability to discriminate between different fault types.

Estimated sensor measurements y produced by the Kalman filter are used instead of actual sensor measurements y to conduct this comparison. The estimated values track measured values well and are less noisy, thus providing superior isolation performance.

Contributed by Aircraft Engine Committee of ASME for the Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power. Manuscript received November 21, 2012; final manuscript received February 22, 2013; published online June 12, 2013. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 135(7), 071203 (Jun 12, 2013) (10 pages) Paper No: GTP-12-1447; doi: 10.1115/1.4023902 History: Received November 21, 2012; Revised February 22, 2013

A Kalman filter-based approach for integrated on-line aircraft engine performance estimation and gas path fault diagnostics is presented. This technique is specifically designed for underdetermined estimation problems where there are more unknown system parameters representing deterioration and faults than available sensor measurements. A previously developed methodology is applied to optimally design a Kalman filter to estimate a vector of tuning parameters, appropriately sized to enable estimation. The estimated tuning parameters can then be transformed into a larger vector of health parameters representing system performance deterioration and fault effects. The results of this study show that basing fault isolation decisions solely on the estimated health parameter vector does not provide ideal results. Furthermore, expanding the number of the health parameters to address additional gas path faults causes a decrease in the estimation accuracy of those health parameters representative of turbomachinery performance deterioration. However, improved fault isolation performance is demonstrated through direct analysis of the estimated tuning parameters produced by the Kalman filter. This was found to provide equivalent or superior accuracy compared to the conventional fault isolation approach based on the analysis of sensed engine outputs, while simplifying online implementation requirements. Results from the application of these techniques to an aircraft engine simulation are presented and discussed.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Society of Automotive Engineers E-32, 2005, “A Guide to the Development of a Ground Station for Engine Condition Monitoring,” SAE Aerospace Information Report No. 4175A.
Volponi, A., and Wood, B., 2005, “Engine Health Management for Aircraft Propulsion Systems,” Proceedings of the Forum on Integrated System Health Engineering and Management (ISHEM) in Aerospace, Napa, CA, November 7–10.
Sieverding, C. H., and Mathioudakis, K., eds., 2003, Gas Turbine Condition Monitoring and Fault Diagnostics (von Kármán Institute Lecture Series), VKI, Rhode-Saint-Genèse, Belgium.
Doel, D. L., 1994, “TEMPER—A Gas Path Analysis Tool for Commercial Jet Engines,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 116(1), pp. 82–89. [CrossRef]
Urban, L. A., 1974, “Parameter Selection for Multiple Fault Diagnostics of Gas Turbine Engines,” Proceedings of the ASME Gas Turbine Conference and Products Show, Zurich, Switzerland, March 30–April 4, ASME Paper No. 74–GT–62.
Y. G.Li, 2002, “Performance-Analysis-Based Gas Turbine Diagnostics: A Review,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part A, 216, pp. 363–377. [CrossRef]
Luppold, R. H., Roman, J. R., Gallops, G. W., and Kerr, L. J., 1989, “Estimating In-Flight Engine Performance Varaiations Using Kalman Filter Concepts,” Proceedings of the AIAA 25th Joint Propulsion Conference, Monterey, CA, July 10–12, Paper No. AIAA-89-2584. [CrossRef]
Volponi, A., 2008, “Enhanced Self-Tuning On-Board Real-Time Model (eSTORM) for Aircraft Engine Performance Health Tracking,” NASA, Report No. CR-2008-215272.
Kumar, A., and Viassolo, D., 2008, “Model-Based Fault Tolerant Control,” NASA, Report No. CR-2008-215273.
Simon, D. L., 2010, “An Integrated Architecture for Onboard Aircraft Engine Performance Trend Monitoring and Gas Path Fault Diagnostics,” Proceedings of the 2010 JANNAF Joint Subcommittee Meeting, Colorado Springs, CO, May 3–7.
Armstrong, J. B., and Simon, D. L., 2011, “Implementation of an Integrated On-Board Aircraft Engine Diagnostic Architecture,” Proceedings of the 47th AIAA Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, San Diego, CA, July 31–August 3, Paper No. AIAA-2011-5859. [CrossRef]
Simon, D. L., and Garg, S., 2010, “Optimal Tuner Selection for Kalman Filter-Based Aircraft Engine Performance Estimation,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 132, p. 031601. [CrossRef]
Simon, D. L., Armstrong, J. B., and Garg, S., 2011, “Application of an Optimal Tuner Selection Approach for On-Board Self-Tuning Engine Models,” Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2011, Vancouver, BC, Canada, June 6–10, ASME Paper No. GT2011-46408. [CrossRef]
Simon, D., 2006, Optimal State Estimation, Kalman, H, and Nonlinear Approaches, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ.
Ganguli, R., and Dan, B., 2004, “Trend Shift Detection in Jet Engines Gas Path Measurements Using Cascaded Recursive Median Filter With Gradient and Laplacian Edge Detector,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 126(1), pp. 55–61. [CrossRef]
Ganguli, R., 2002, “Data Rectification and Detection of Trend Shifts in Jet Engine Path Measurements Using Median Filters and Fuzzy Logic,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 124(4), pp. 809–816. [CrossRef]
DePold, H., and Gass, F. D., 1999, “The Application of Expert Systems and Neural Networks to Gas Turbine Prognostics and Diagnostics,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 121(4), pp. 607–612. [CrossRef]
Provost, M. J., 2003, “Kalman Filtering Applied to Gas Turbine Analysis,” Gas Turbine Condition Monitoring and Fault Diagnosis (von Kármán Institute Lecture Series), C. H.Sieverding and K.Mathioudakis, eds., VKI, Rhode-Saint-Genèse, Belgium.
Borguet, S., and Léonard, O., 2010, “A Sparse Estimation Approach to Fault Isolation,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 132(2), p. 021601. [CrossRef]
Sorum, M. J., 1971, “Estimating the Conditional Probability of Misclassification,” Technometrics, 13(2), pp. 333–343. [CrossRef]
Frederick, D. K., DeCastro, J. A., and Litt, J. S., 2007, “User's Guide for the Commercial Modular Aero-Propulsion System Simulation (C-MAPSS),” NASA, Technical Memorandum No. TM-2007-215026.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Ground station performance trend monitoring and gas path diagnostic process

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Gradual versus rapid performance shifts

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

On-board performance trend monitoring and gas path diagnostic process (original proposed design)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

On-board performance trend monitoring and gas path diagnostic process (simplified proposed design)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Example of Kalman filter design 2 health parameter estimation during fan fault (top) and HPT fault (bottom)



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In