Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Combustion, Fuels, and Emissions

Comparison of Nonlinear to Linear Thermoacoustic Stability Analysis of a Gas Turbine Combustion System

[+] Author and Article Information
Werner Krebs

e-mail: wernerkrebs@siemens.com

Harmen Krediet

Siemens AG,
Energy Sector,
Mülheim 45473, Germany

Enrique Portillo

Siemens AG,
Energy Sector,
Orlando, FL 32817

Thierry Poinsot

Toulouse 31057,France

Oliver Paschereit

Technische Universität Berlin,
Berlin 10623,Germany

The transport equation for acoustic energy accounting for mean flow contribution can be derived by treating Eq. (1) in the same manner.

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Combustion and Fuels Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received December 21, 2012; final manuscript received February 12, 2013; published online June 24, 2013. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 135(8), 081503 (Jun 24, 2013) (8 pages) Paper No: GTP-12-1491; doi: 10.1115/1.4023887 History: Received December 21, 2012; Revised February 12, 2013

Gas turbines offer a high operational flexibility and a good turn down ratio to meet future requirements of power production. In this context, stable operation over a wide range and for different blends of fuel is requested. Thermoacoustic stability assessment is crucial for accelerating the development and implementation of new combustion systems. The results of nonlinear and linear thermoacoustic stability assessments are compared on the basis of recent measurements of flame describing functions and thermoacoustic stability of a model swirl combustor operating in the fully turbulent regime. The different assessment methods are outlined. The linear thermoacoustic stability assessment yields growth rates of the thermoacoustic instability whereas the limit cycle amplitude is predicted by the nonlinear stability method. It could be shown that the predicted limit cycle amplitudes correlate well with the growth rates of excitation obtained from linear modeling. Hence, for screening the thermoacoustic stability of different design approaches a linear assessment may be sufficient while for detailed prediction of the dynamic pressure amplitude more efforts have to be spent on the nonlinear assessment including the analysis of the nonlinear flame response.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Krebs, W., Hellat, J., and Eroglu, A., 2003, “Technische Verbrennungssysteme,” Stationäre Gasturbinen, C.Lechner and J.Seume, eds., Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Gruschka, U., Janus, B., Meisl, J., Huth, M., and Wasif, S., 2008, “ULN System for the New SGT5-8000H Gas Turbine Design and High Pressure Rig Test Results,” Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo, Berlin, June 9–13, ASME Paper No. GT2008-51208. [CrossRef]
Culick, F., 2006, “Unsteady Motions in Combustion Chambers for Propulsion Systems,” RTO AGARDograph, Report No. AG-AVT-039.
Lieuwen, T., and Yang, V., 2005, Combustion Instabilities in Gas Turbine Engines (Vol. 210 of Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics), AIAA, Reston, VA.
Krebs, W., Lepers, J., Prade, B., Flohr, P., Pollarolo, G., and Ferrante, A., 2005, “Investigation of Thermoacoustic Stability Limits of an Annular Gas Turbine Combustor Test Rig With and Without Helmholtz Resonators,” Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo, Reno, NV, June 6–9, ASME Paper No. GT2005-68246. [CrossRef]
Polifke, W., Poncet, A., Paschereit, A. O., and Döbbeling, K., 2005, “Reconstruction of Acoustic Transfer Matrices by in Stationary Computational Fluid Dynamics,” J. Sound Vib., 245, pp. 483–510. [CrossRef]
Selimefendigil, F., and Polifke, W., 2011, “A Nonlinear Frequency Domain Model for Limit Cycles in Thermoacoustic Systems With Modal Coupling,” Int. J. Spray Combust. Dyn., 3, pp. 303–330. [CrossRef]
Palies, P., Durox, D., Schuller, T., and Candel, S., 2011, “Nonlinear Combustion Instability Analysis Based on the Flame Describing Function Applied to Turbulent Premixed Swirling Flames,” Combust. Flame, 158, pp. 1980–1991. [CrossRef]
Hield, P. A., Brear, M. J., and Jin, S. H., 2009, “Thermo-Acoustic Limit Cycles in a Premixed Laboratory Combustor With Open and Choked Exits,” Combust. Flame, 156, pp. 1683–1697. [CrossRef]
Krediet, H. J., Portillo, J. E., Krebs, W., and Kok, J. B. W., 2010, “Prediction of Thermoacoustic Limit Cycles During Premixed Combustion Using the Modified Galerkin Approach,” Proceedings of the 46th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Nashville, TN, July 25–28.
Schimek, S., Moeck, J. P., and Paschereit, C. O., 2010, “An Experimental Investigation of the Nonlinear Response of an Atmospheric Swirl-Stabilized Premixed Flame,” Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo, Glasgow, UK, June 14–18, ASME Paper No. GT2010-22827. [CrossRef]
Krediet, H., Beck, C., Krebs, W., Schimek, S., and Paschereit, C. O., 2011, “Identification of the Flame Describing Function of a Premixed Swirl Flame From LES,” Proceedings of the 7th Mediterranean Combustion Symposium, Sardinia, Italy, September 11–15.
Selle, L., Benoit, L., Poinsot, T., Nicoud, F., and Krebs, W., 2006, “Joint Use of Compressible Large Eddy Simulation and Helmholtz Solvers for the Analysis of Rotating Modes in an Industrial Swirled Burner,” Combust. Flame, 145, pp. 194–205. [CrossRef]
Krebs, W., Kaufmann, P., Valdes, R., and Wever, U., 2008, “3D Thermoacoustic Properties of Single Can and Multi Can Combustor Configurations,” Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo, Berlin, June 9–13, ASME Paper No. GT2008-50755. [CrossRef]
Poinsot, T., and Veynante, D., 2001, “Theoretical and Numerical Combustion,” R. T. Edwards, Inc., Philadelphia, PA.
Chu, B. T., 1965, “On the Energy Transfer to Small Disturbances in Fluid Flow (Part I),” Acta Mech., 1, pp. 215–234. [CrossRef]
Nicoud, F., and Poinsot, T., 2005, “Thermoacoustic Instabilities: Should the Rayleigh Criterion be Extended to Include Entropy Changes?” Combust. Flame, 142, pp. 153–159. [CrossRef]
George, K. J., and Sujith, R. I., 2011, “On Chu's Disturbance Energy,” J. Sound Vib., 330, pp. 5280–5291. [CrossRef]
Crocco, L., and Cheng, S. L., 1956, Theory of Combustion Instability in Liquid Propellant Rocket Motors (Agardograph No. 8), Butterworths, Washington, DC.
Munjal, M. L., 1987, Acoustics of Ducts and Mufflers, Wiley, New York.
Zinn, B. T., and Lores, M. E., 1971, “Application of the Galerkin Method in the Solution of Non-Linear Axial Combustion Instability Problems in Liquid Rockets,” Combust. Sci. Technol., 14, pp. 269–278. [CrossRef]
Portillo, J. E., Sisco, J. C., and Anderson, W. E., 2007, “Application of a Generalized Instability Model to a Longitudinal Mode Combustion Chamber,” Proceedings of the 43rd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Cincinnati, OH, July 8–11.
Schimek, S., Moeck, J. P., and Paschereit, C. O., 2009, “Design of a Combustion Test Rig With High Amplitude Forcing Capabilities for Nonlinear Flame Transfer Function Measurements,” Proceedings of the 16th International Congress on Sound and Vibration (ICSV16), Krakow, Poland, July 5–9.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Interaction between energy losses and energy gain via unsteady heat addition

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schematic drawing of the test rig [11]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Flame describing function for the perfectly premixed case

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Flame describing function for the partially premixed case

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Growth rate of the linear stability assessment of the partially premixed and perfectly premixed flame

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Representation of the TU Berlin rig with the GIM tool

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Limit cycle prediction of the dynamic pressure amplitude for the partially premixed case with flame describing function from measurement

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Dynamic pressure spectrum of the instability

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Calculated energy balance of gain and losses for the partially premixed case

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Limit cycle amplitudes of dynamic pressure for the perfectly premixed and partially premixed system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Comparison of growth rate to limit cycle amplitude for the perfectly premixed case

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Comparison of growth rate to limit cycle amplitude for the partially premixed case

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Thermoacoustic energy balance for systems with different growth rates in the linear regime I



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In