Technical Briefs

Performance Entitlement of Supercritical Steam Bottoming Cycle

[+] Author and Article Information
S. Can Gülen

Principal Engineer
GE Power and Water,
Schenectady, NY 12345

In other words, if the RBC were a Carnot cycle utilizing the heat extracted from the GT exhaust by cooling it to the reference temperature To its efficiency would be 50%. A modern 3PRH system with an advanced ST is capable only of about 35–38%, i.e., roughly 75% of the entitlement imposed by the second law of thermodynamics.

Currently, duct firing up to ∼750–815 °C is possible in HRSGs equipped with internal lining with insulation and metallic alloy sheet retainers. Above that and up to 925 °C, HRSG walls are lined with refractory materials. Higher temperatures would require water-cooled walls.

1Current address: Bechtel Power, Frederick, MD 21703.

Contributed by the Cycle Innovations Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received September 4, 2012; final manuscript received July 16, 2013; published online September 20, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Wolfgang Sanz.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 135(12), 124501 (Sep 20, 2013) (4 pages) Paper No: GTP-12-1348; doi: 10.1115/1.4025260 History: Received September 04, 2012; Revised July 16, 2013

A supercritical steam bottoming cycle has been proposed as a performance enhancement option for gas turbine combined cycle power plants. The technology has been widely used in coal-fired steam turbine power plants since the 1950s and can be considered a mature technology. Its application to the gas-fired combined cycle systems presents unique design challenges due to the much lower gas temperatures (i.e., 650 °C at the gas turbine exhaust vis-à-vis 2000 °C in fossil fuel-fired steam boilers). Thus, the potential impact of the supercritical steam conditions is hampered to the point of economic infeasibility. This technical brief draws upon the second-law based exergy concept to rigorously quantify the performance entitlement of a supercritical high-pressure boiler section in a heat recovery steam generator utilizing the exhaust of a gas turbine to generate steam for power generation in a steam turbine.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Robb, D., 2011, “The Gas Turbine Four Minute Mile,” Turbomach. Int., 52, pp. 6.
Gülen, S. C., and Smith, R. W., 2010, “Second Law Efficiency of the Rankine Bottoming Cycle of a Combined Cycle Power Plant,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 132, p. 011801. [CrossRef]
Kalina, A. I., 1984, “Combined Cycle System With Novel Bottoming Cycle,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 106, pp. 737–742. [CrossRef]
Zhang, W., Magee, J., Singh, H., Ruchti, C., and Selby, G., 2012, “HRSG Development for the Future,” PowerGen Europe 2012, Köln, Germany, June 12-14.
Kjaer, S., Bugge, J., and Stolzenberger, C., 2004, “Europeans Still Aiming for 700 °C Steam,” Mod. Power Syst., 24, pp. 19–25.
Gülen, S. C., 2010, “Importance of Auxiliary Power Consumption for Combined Cycle Performance,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 133, p. 041801. [CrossRef]
Bolland, O., 1991, “A Comparative Evaluation of Advanced Combined Cycle Alternatives,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 113, pp. 191–197. [CrossRef]
GT PRO Version 20.0, Thermoflow, Inc., Southborough, MA, www.thermoflow.com
Rukes, B., and Taud, R., 2004, “Status and Perspectives of Fossil Power Generation,” Energy, 29, pp. 1853–1874. [CrossRef]
Galopin, J. F., 1998, “Going Supercritical: Once-Through is the Key,” Mod. Power Syst., 18, pp. 39.
Jury, W., and Searles, D. E., 1997, “Process Optimization of an Integrated Combined Cycle—The Impact and Benefit of Sequential Combustion,” ASME Paper No. 97-GT-490.
Tomlinson, L. O., Smith, R. W., Ranasinghe, J., Gülen, S. C., and Rancruel, D. F., 2011, “Supercritical Steam Combined Cycle and Method,” U.S. Patent 7,874,162 B2.
Smith, R. W., 2001, “Multi-Pressure Reheat Combined Cycle With Multiple Reheaters,” U.S. Patent No. 6,220,013.
Horlock, J. H., 1995, “Combined Power Plants—Past, Present, and Future,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 117, pp. 608–616. [CrossRef]
Jordal, K., Fridh, J., Hunyadi, L., Jönsson, M., and Linder, U., 2002, “New Possibilities for Combined Cycles Through Advanced Steam Technology,” ASME Turbo Expo 2002, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, June 3–6, ASME Paper No. GT2002-30151. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Combined cycle bottoming cycle heat release diagram for a typical 3PRH system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Improvement in the RBC exergetic efficiency requisite for improved CC efficiency with supplementary firing (for the GT exhaust of 638  °C (3PRH) and 553  °C (2PRH))



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In