Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Turbomachinery

Analysis and Modeling of Entropy Modes in a Realistic Aeronautical Gas Turbine

[+] Author and Article Information
Emmanuel Motheau

42 av. Gaspard Coriolis, Toulouse 31057, France
e-mail: emmanuel.motheau@cerfacs.fr

Yoann Mery

Safran Snecma,
Rond Point René Ravaud,
Moissy Cramayel 77550, France
e-mail: yoann.mery@snecma.fr

Franck Nicoud

CNRS UMR 5149,
University Montpellier II,
Montpellier 34095, France
e-mail: franck.nicoud@univ-montp2.fr

Thierry Poinsot

CNRS-Institut de Mécanique des Fluides,
1 Allée du Professeur Camille Soula,
Toulouse 31000, France
e-mail: thierry.poinsot@cerfacs.fr

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Turbomachinery Committee of ASME for publication in the Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power. Manuscript received June 27, 2013; final manuscript received June 27, 2013; published online August 21, 2013. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 135(9), 092602 (Aug 21, 2013) (7 pages) Paper No: GTP-13-1190; doi: 10.1115/1.4024953 History: Received June 27, 2013; Revised June 27, 2013

A combustion instability in a combustor typical of aero-engines is analyzed and modeled thanks to a low order Helmholtz solver. A dynamic mode decomposition (DMD) is first applied to the large eddy simulation (LES) database. The mode with the highest amplitude shares the same frequency of oscillation as the experiment (approximately 350 Hz) and it shows the presence of large entropy spots generated within the combustion chamber and convected down to the exit nozzle. With the lowest purely acoustic mode being in the range 650–700 Hz, it is postulated that the instability observed around 350 Hz stems from a mixed entropy/acoustic mode where the acoustic generation associated with the entropy spots being convected throughout the choked nozzle plays a key role. A delayed entropy coupled boundary condition is then derived in order to account for this interaction in the framework of a Helmholtz solver where the baseline flow is assumed to be at rest. When fed with the appropriate transfer functions to model the entropy generation and convection from the flame to the exit, the Helmholtz solver proves able to predict the presence of an unstable mode around 350 Hz, which is in agreement with both the LES and the experiments. This finding supports the idea that the instability observed in the combustor is indeed driven by the entropy/acoustic coupling.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Rayleigh, L., 1878, “The Explanation of Certain Acoustic Phenomena,” Nature (London), 18, pp. 319–321. [CrossRef]
Lieuwen, T., and Yang, V., 2005, Combustion Instabilities in Gas Turbine Engines. Operational Experience, Fundamental Mechanisms and Modeling, ( Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, Vol. 210), AIAA, Reston, VA, p. 51.
Culick, F. E. C., and Kuentzmann, P., 2006, Unsteady Motions in Combustion Chambers for Propulsion Systems, NATO Research and Technology Organization, Washington, DC.
Hield, P., Brear, M., and Jin, S., 2009, “Thermoacoustic Limit Cycles in a Premixed Laboratory Combustor With Open and Choked Exits,” Combust. Flame, 156(9), pp. 1683–1697. [CrossRef]
Huang, Y., and Yang, V., 2004, “Bifurcation of Flame Structure in a Lean Premixed Swirl-Stabilized Combustor: Transition From Stable to Unstable Flame,” Combust. Flame, 136, pp. 383–389. [CrossRef]
Schmitt, P., Poinsot, T., Schuermans, B., and Geigle, K. P., 2007, “Large-Eddy Simulation and Experimental Study of Heat Transfer, Nitric Oxide Emissions and Combustion Instability in a Swirled Turbulent High-Pressure Burner,” J. Fluid Mech., 570, pp. 17–46. [CrossRef]
Poinsot, T., and Veynante, D., 2005, Theoretical and Numerical Combustion, 2nd ed., Edwards, Ann Arbor, MI.
Crocco, L., 1952, “Aspects of Combustion Instability in Liquid Propellant Rocket Motors. Part II,” J. Am. Rocket Soc., 22, pp. 7–16. [CrossRef]
Nicoud, F., Benoit, L., Sensiau, C., and Poinsot, T., 2007, “Acoustic Modes in Combustors With Complex Impedances and Multidimensional Active Flames,” AIAA J., 45, pp. 426–441. [CrossRef]
Nicoud, F., and Wieczorek, K., 2009, “About the Zero Mach Number Assumption in the Calculation of Thermoacoustic Instabilities,” Int. J. Spray Combust. Dyn., 1, pp. 67–112. [CrossRef]
Marble, F. E., and Candel, S., 1977, “Acoustic Disturbances From Gas Nonuniformities Convected Through a Nozzle,” J. Sound Vib., 55, pp. 225–243. [CrossRef]
Leyko, M., Nicoud, F., and Poinsot, T., 2009, “Comparison of Direct and Indirect Combustion Noise Mechanisms in a Model Combustor,” AIAA J., 47(11), pp. 2709–2716. [CrossRef]
Colin, O., Ducros, F., Veynante, D., and Poinsot, T., 2000, “A Thickened Flame Model for Large Eddy Simulations of Turbulent Premixed Combustion,” Phys. Fluids, 12(7), pp. 1843–1863. [CrossRef]
Franzelli, B., Riber, E., Sanjosé, M., and Poinsot, T., 2010, “A Two-Step Chemical Scheme for Large-Eddy Simulation of Kerosene-Air Flames,” Combust. Flame, 157(7), pp. 1364–1373. [CrossRef]
Poinsot, T., and Lele, S., 1992, “Boundary Conditions for Direct Simulations of Compressible Viscous Flows,” J. Comput. Phys., 101(1), pp. 104–129. [CrossRef]
Schmid, P. J., 2010, “Dynamic Mode Decomposition of Numerical and Experimental Data,” J. Fluid Mech., 656, pp. 5–28. [CrossRef]
Motheau, E., Nicoud, F., and Poinsot, T., 2012, “Using Boundary Conditions to Account For Mean Flow Effects in a Zero Mach Number Acoustic Solver,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 134(11), p. 111502. [CrossRef]
Dowling, A. P., 1995, “The Calculation of Thermoacoustic Oscillations,” J. Sound Vib., 180(4), pp. 557–581. [CrossRef]
Wolf, P., Staffelbach, G., Gicquel, L. Y., Müller, J.-D., and Poinsot, T., 2012, “Acoustic and Large Eddy Simulation Studies of Azimuthal Modes in Annular Combustion Chambers,” Combust. Flame, 159(11), pp. 3398–3413. [CrossRef]
Sensiau, C., Nicoud, F., and Poinsot, T., 2009, “A Tool to Study Azimuthal and Spinning Modes in Annular Combustors,” Int. J. Aeroacoust., 8(1), pp. 57–68. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Description of the configuration of interest. One sector of the azimuthal SAFRAN combustor is represented.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Typical snapshot from the LES of the SAFRAN combustor and time evolution of pressure within the chamber

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Fluctuating pressure (left) and temperature (right) from the DMD mode at 331 Hz. From top to bottom, the four rows correspond to phases 0, π/2, π, and 3π/2.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Schematic view of the modeling strategy: instead of solving for the LEEs over the whole domain, the Helmholtz equation is solved over the combustion chamber only, with the acoustic environment from the compressor and turbine being accounted for by imposing proper impedances, which take into account the mean flow

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Frequency of the oscillation (upper graph) and growth rate (bottom graph) corresponding to a 1D combustor mounted on a compact choked nozzle. Solid line (—): analytical result at finite Mach number [19]. Symbols: Helmholtz equation at zero Mach number and Eq. (9) as the boundary condition, without (+, Gus=0) or with (×, Gus from Eq. (8)) entropy coupling.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Computational domain for the Helmholtz analysis. The point of reference and the zone of averaging used for the entropy generation modeling (see Eq. (10)) are displayed along with the exit section where the entropy-acoustic boundary condition (see Eq. (5)) is applied.



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In