Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Structures and Dynamics

Windage Measurements in a Rotor-Stator System With Superimposed Cooling and Rotor-Mounted Protrusions

[+] Author and Article Information
Xiang Luo

e-mail: xiang.luo@buaa.edu.cn

Da Zhang

e-mail: zhangdamail@gmail.com

Zhi Tao

e-mail: tao_zhi@buaa.edu.cn

Guoqiang Xu

e-mail: guoqiang_xu@buaa.edu.cn

Qianshun Wang

e-mail: 504939893@qq.com
National Key Laboratory of Science
and Technology
on Aero-Engine Aero-Thermodynamics,
Beihang University,
37# Xueyuan Road, Haidian District,
Beijing 100191, China

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Structures and Dynamics Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received November 12, 2013; final manuscript received November 21, 2013; published online December 19, 2013. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 136(4), 042505 (Dec 19, 2013) (11 pages) Paper No: GTP-13-1411; doi: 10.1115/1.4026086 History: Received November 12, 2013; Revised November 21, 2013

This paper has experimentally studied the windage torque in a rotor-stator system with superimposed central inflow and rotor-mounted protrusions. A novel measurement method has been proposed, and the basic principle is to transform the torque of rotating components into static torque measured by using a static torquemeter. Compared with the previous research, the difference of the moment coefficient for the free plain disk in this paper is within 10%. The disk models used in the experiments included a plain disk and a rotor with 18 protrusions. Plain-disk results were obtained with axial clearances varying from 4.5 mm to 40.5 mm and a stator of the same diameter. Two test cases were performed: one was the case where the flow structure was dominated by the superimposed flow and the other was where rotation dominated the flow structure. For the plain-disk case, as turbulence parameter increases, the sensitivity of the torque to variations of G value also increases, leaving the moment coefficient as a function of the rotational and throughflow Reynolds number only. Comparing to the flow parameter, gap ratio and shroud-clearance ratio have weaker influence on frictional moment coefficient. The rotor with protrusions results showed that the gap ratio had negligible effect on the moment coefficient for the former case; however, the torque decreased by approximately 20% with the decrease of the gap ratio for the latter case. It was also found that, for different configurations, the deviation in the moment coefficient was attributed to variations in form drag. In addition, the moment coefficient was affected by the orientation of bolts with respect to the direction of rotation. The empirical correlations have been proposed for the windage losses of various bolt configurations, and a further discussion about minimizing the windage losses was conducted.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Dorfman, L. A., 1963, Hydrodynamic Resistance and the Heat Loss of Rotating Solids, Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh, UK.
Bayley, F. J., and Owen, J. M., 1969, “Flow Between a Rotating and a Stationary Disc,” Aeronaut. Q., 20, pp. 333–354.
Von Kármán, T., 1921, “Technical Memorandum on Laminar and Turbulent Friction,” National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics Report No. 1092.
Daily, J. W., and Nece, R. E., 1960, “Chamber Dimension Effects on Induced Flow and Frictional Resistance of Enclosed Rotating Disks,” ASME J. Basic Eng., 82, pp. 217–230. [CrossRef]
Daily, J. W., Ernst, W. D., and Asbedian, V., 1964, “Enclosed Rotating Disks With Superposed Throughflow,” MIT, Department of Civil Engineering, Hydrodynamics Laboratory, Cambridge, MA, Report No. 64.
Dibelius, G., Radtke, F., and Ziemann, M., 1984, “Experiments on Friction, Velocity and Pressure Distribution of Rotating Discs,” Heat and Mass Transfer in Rotating Machinery, Dubrovnik, Yugoslavia, August 30–September 3, pp. 117–130.
Zimmermann, H., Firsching, A., Dibelius, G., and Ziemann, M., 1986, “Friction Losses and Flow Distribution for Rotating Disks With Shielded and Protruding Bolts,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 108(3), pp. 547–552. [CrossRef]
Owen, J. M., 1971, “The Effect of Forced Flow on Heat Transfer From a Disc Rotating Near a Stator,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 14(8), pp. 1135–1147. [CrossRef]
Owen, J. M., 1984, “Fluid Flow and Heat Transfer in Rotating Disc Systems,” Heat and Mass Transfer in Rotating Machinery, Dubrovnik, Yugoslavia, August 30–September 3, pp. 81–103.
Chew, J. W., and Vaughan, C. M., 1988, “Numerical Predictions for the Flow Induced by an Enclosed Rotating Disc,” NASA STI/Recon Technical Report No. 88, p. 28281.
Owen, J. M., and Rogers, R. H., 1989, Flow and Heat Transfer in Rotating-Disc Systems, Research Studies Press, Taunton, UK.
Gartner, W., 1997, “A Prediction Method for the Frictional Torque of a Rotating Disc in a Stationary Housing With Superimposed Radial Outflow,” ASME Paper No. 97-GT-204.
Owen, J. M., “An Approximate Solution for the Flow Between a Rotating and a Stationary Disk,” ASME J. Turbomach., 111(3), pp. 323–332. [CrossRef]
Gartner, W., 1998, “A Momentum Integral Method to Predict the Frictional Torque of a Rotating Disc With Protruding Bolts,” ASME Paper No. 98-GT-138.
Daniels, W. A., Johnson, B. V., Graber, D. J., and Martin, R. J., 1992, “Rim Seal Experiments and Analysis for Turbine Applications,” ASME J. Turbomach., 114(2), pp. 426–432. [CrossRef]
Millward, J. A., and Robinson, P. H., 1989, “Experimental Investigation Into the Effects of Rotating and Static Bolts on Both Windage Heating and Local Heat Transfer Coefficients in a Rotor-Stator Cavity,” ASME Paper No. 89-GT-196.
Poncet, S., Chauve, M.-P., and Schiestel, R., 2005, “Batchelor Versus Stewartson Flow Structures in a Rotor-Stator Cavity With Throughflow,” Phys. Fluids, 17(7), p. 075110. [CrossRef]
Coren, D., Childs, P. R. N., and Long, C. A., 2009, “Windage Sources in Smooth-Walled Rotating Disc Systems,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci., 223(4), pp. 873–888. [CrossRef]
Miles, A. L., 2012, “An Experimental Study of Windage Due to Rotating and Static Bolts in an Enclosed Rotor-Stator System,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Moghaddam, E. R., Long, C., and Sayma, A., 2013, “A Numerical Investigation of Moment Coefficient and Flow Structure in a Rotor–Stator Cavity With Rotor-Mounted Bolts,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part A, 227(3), pp. 306–327. [CrossRef]
Long, C., Miles, A. L., and Coren, D., 2012, “Windage Measurements in a Rotor Stator Cavity With Rotor Mounted Protrusions and Bolts,” ASME Paper No. GT2012-69385. [CrossRef]
Schlichting, H., and Kestin, J., 1979, Boundary-Layer Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

The schematic of the test rig

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

The geometrical model of rotor-stator system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

The orientation of bolts with respect to rotation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Free-disk correlations and the experimental results

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Moment coefficients as a function of rotational Reynolds number for free disk

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

The influence factor for the six configurations

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Comparison of the moment coefficient data with Owen's regional model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Effect of gap ratio on moment coefficients for the plain disk in rotor-stator systems

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Effect of clearance ratio on moment coefficients for the plain-disk cases

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Moment coefficient comparison among the different flow parameters

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Effect of gap ratio on the moment coefficient with different configurations

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Moment coefficient as a function of turbulent flow parameter with superimposed flow in centrifugal direction

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Moment coefficient data for Cw = 0.682 × 104

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Moment coefficient data for Cw = 3.41 × 104

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Collapse of the moment coefficient results

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Comparison of new correlation with Owen's regional model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Protrusions and measured and correlated values of Cm



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In