Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Combustion, Fuels, and Emissions

Impact of Shear Flow Instabilities on the Magnitude and Saturation of the Flame Response

[+] Author and Article Information
Steffen Terhaar

Chair of Fluid Dynamics
Technische Universität Berlin,
Müller-Breslau-Str. 8,
Berlin 10623, Germany
e-mail: steffen.terhaar@tu-berlin.de

Bernhard Ćosić, Christian Oliver Paschereit

Chair of Fluid Dynamics
Technische Universität Berlin,
Müller-Breslau-Str. 8,
Berlin 10623, Germany

Kilian Oberleithner

Laboratory for Turbulence Research in Aerospace
and Combustion,
Monash University,
Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia

Contributed by the Combustion and Fuels Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received December 18, 2013; final manuscript received January 13, 2014; published online February 18, 2014. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 136(7), 071502 (Feb 18, 2014) (9 pages) Paper No: GTP-13-1454; doi: 10.1115/1.4026530 History: Received December 18, 2013; Revised January 13, 2014

Amplitude-dependent flame transfer functions, also denoted as flame describing functions, are valuable tools for the prediction of limit-cycle amplitudes of thermoacoustic instabilities. However, the effects that govern the transfer function magnitude at low and high amplitudes are not yet fully understood. It is shown in the present work that the flame response at perfectly premixed conditions is strongly influenced by the growth rate of vortical structures in the shear layers. An experimental study in a generic swirl-stabilized combustor was conducted in order to measure the amplitude-dependent flame transfer function and the corresponding flow fields subjected to acoustic forcing. The applied measurement techniques included the multi-microphone-method, high-speed OH*-chemiluminescence measurements, and high-speed particle image velocimetry. The flame response and the corresponding flow fields are assessed for three different swirl numbers at 196 Hz forcing frequency. The results show that forcing leads to significant changes in the time-averaged reacting flow fields and flame shapes. A triple decomposition is applied to the time-resolved data, which reveals that coherent velocity fluctuations at the forcing frequency are amplified considerably stronger in the shear layers at low forcing amplitudes than at high amplitudes, which is an indicator for a nonlinear saturation process. The strongest saturation is found for the lowest swirl number, where the forcing additionally detached the flame. For the highest swirl number, the saturation of the vortex amplitude is weaker. Overall, the amplitude-dependent vortex amplification resembles the characteristics of the flame response very well. An application of a linear stability analysis to the time-averaged flow fields at increasing forcing amplitudes yields the decreasing growth rates of shear flow instabilities at the forcing frequency. It therefore successfully predicts a saturation at high forcing amplitudes and demonstrates that the mean flow field and its modifications are of utmost importance for the growth of vortices in the shear layers. Moreover, the results clearly show that the amplification of vortices in the shear layers is an important driver for heat release fluctuations and their saturation.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Rayleigh, J. W. S., 1878, “The Explanation of Certain Acoustical Phenomena,” Nature (London), 18(455), pp. 319–321. [CrossRef]
Lieuwen, T., and Yang, V., 2005, “Combustion Instabilities in Gas Turbine Engines: Operational Experience, Fundamental Mechanisms, and Modeling,” Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, Vol. 210, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA.
Syred, N., 2006, “A Review of Oscillation Mechanisms and the Role of the Precessing Vortex Core (PVC) in Swirl Combustion Systems,” Prog. Energy Combust.Sci., 32(2), pp. 93–161. [CrossRef]
Cala, C. E., Fernandes, E. C., Heitor, M. V., and Shtork, S. I., 2005, “Coherent Structures in Unsteady Swirling Jet Flow,” Exp. Fluids, 40(2), pp. 267–276. [CrossRef]
Schadow, K. C., and Gutmark, E. J., 1992, “Combustion Instability Related to Vortex Shedding in Dump Combustors and Their Passive Control,” Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 18(2), pp. 117–132. [CrossRef]
Paschereit, C. O., Gutmark, E. J., and Weisenstein, W., 1999, “Coherent Structures in Swirling Flows and Their Role in Acoustic Combustion Control,” Phys. Fluids, 11(9), pp. 2667–2678. [CrossRef]
Paschereit, C. O., Gutmark, E. J., and Weisenstein, W., 2000, “Excitation of Thermoacoustic Instabilities by Interaction of Acoustics and Unstable Swirling Flow,” AIAA J., 38(6), pp. 1025–1034. [CrossRef]
Keller, J. J., 1995, “Thermoacoustic Oscillations in Combustion Chambers of Gas Turbines,” AIAA J., 33(12), pp. 2280–2287. [CrossRef]
Gallaire, F., Ruith, M. R., Meiburg, E., Chomaz, J.-M., and Huerre, P., 2006, “Spiral Vortex Breakdown as a Global Mode,” J. Fluid Mech., 549, pp. 71–90. [CrossRef]
Moeck, J. P., Bourgouin, J.-F., Durox, D., Schuller, T., and Candel, S., 2012, “Nonlinear Interaction Between a Precessing Vortex Core and Acoustic Oscillations in a Turbulent Swirling Flame,” Combust. Flame, 159(8), pp. 2650–2668. [CrossRef]
Dowling, A. P., 1997, “Nonlinear Self-Excited Oscillations of a Ducted Flame,” J. Fluid Mech., 346, pp. 271–290. [CrossRef]
Palies, P., Durox, D., Schuller, T., and Candel, S., 2011, “Nonlinear Combustion Instability Analysis Based on the Flame Describing Function Applied to Turbulent Premixed Swirling Flames,” Combust. Flame, 158(10), pp. 1980–1991. [CrossRef]
Cosic, B., Moeck, J. P., and Paschereit, C. O., 2013, “Nonlinear Instability Analysis for Partially Premixed Swirl Flames,” Combust. Sci. Technol. (online). [CrossRef]
Schimek, S., Moeck, J. P., Cosic, B., Terhaar, S., and Paschereit, C. O., 2012, “Amplitude-Dependent Flowfield and Flame Response to Axial and Tangential Velocity Fluctuations,” ASME Turbo Expo 2012, Copenhagen, Denmark, June 11–15, ASME Paper No. GT2012-69785. [CrossRef]
Bellows, B. D., Bobba, M. K., Seitzman, J. M., and Lieuwen, T., 2007, “Nonlinear Flame Transfer Function Characteristics in a Swirl-Stabilized Combustor,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 129(4), pp. 954–961. [CrossRef]
Thumuluru, S., and Lieuwen, T., 2009, “Characterization of Acoustically Forced Swirl Flame Dynamics,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 32(2), pp. 2893–2900. [CrossRef]
Oberleithner, K., Schimek, S., and Paschereit, C. O., 2012, “On the Impact of Shear Flow Instabilities on Global Heat Release Rate Fluctuations: Linear Stability Analysis of an Isothermal and a Reacting Swirling Jet,” ASME Turbo Expo, Copenhagen, Denmark, June 11–15, ASME Paper No. GT2012-69774. [CrossRef]
Hussain, A. K. M. F., and Reynolds, W. C., 2006, “The Mechanics of an Organized Wave in Turbulent Shear Flow,” J. Fluid Mech., 41(2), p. 241. [CrossRef]
Khorrami, M., Malik, M., and Ash, R., 1989, “Application of Spectral Collocation Techniques to the Stability of Swirling Flows,” J. Comput. Phys., 81(1), pp. 206–229. [CrossRef]
Crighton, D. G., and Gaster, M., 1976, “Stability of Slowly Diverging Jet Flow,” J. Fluid Mech., 77(2), p. 397. [CrossRef]
Oberleithner, K., Sieber, M., Nayeri, C. N., Paschereit, C. O., Petz, C., Hege, H.-C., Noack, B. R., and Wygnanski, I. J., 2011, “Three-Dimensional Coherent Structures in a Swirling Jet Undergoing Vortex Breakdown: Stability Analysis and Empirical Mode Construction,” J. Fluid Mech., 679, pp. 383–414. [CrossRef]
Monkewitz, P. A., and Sohn, K., 1988, “Absolute Instability in Hot Jets,” AIAA J., 26(8), pp. 911–916. [CrossRef]
Terhaar, S., Oberleithner, K., and Paschereit, C. O., “Impact of Steam-Dilution on the Flame Shape and Coherent Structures in Swirl-Stabilized Combustors,” Combust. Sci. Technol. (in press) [CrossRef].
Lim, D. W., and Redekopp, L. G., 1998, “Absolute Instability Conditions for Variable Density, Swirling Jet Flows,” Eur. J. Mech.-B/Fluids, 17(2), pp. 165–185. [CrossRef]
Cohen, J., and Wygnanski, I. J., 1987, “The Evolution of Instabilities in the Axisymmetric Jet. Part 1. The Linear Growth of Disturbances Near the Nozzle,” J. Fluid Mech., 176, pp. 191–219. [CrossRef]
Cohen, J., and Wygnanski, I. J., 1987, “The Evolution of Instabilities in the Axisymmetric Jet. Part 2. The Flow Resulting From the Interaction Between Two Waves,” J. Fluid Mech., 176, pp. 221–235. [CrossRef]
Gudmundsson, K., and Colonius, T., 2008, “Nonlinear Parabolized Stability Equation Models for Turbulent Jets and Their Radiated Sound,” 61st Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Fluid Dynamics, San Antonio, TX, November 23–25, Abstract No. LF.00002, available at: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2008.DFD.LF.2
Leuckel, W., 1967, “Swirl Intensities, Swirl Types and Energy Losses of Different Swirl Generating Devices”. International Flame Research Foundation, Ijmuiden, The Netherlands, Doc. No. G02/a/16.
Terhaar, S., Bobusch, B. C., and Paschereit, C. O., 2012, “Effects of Outlet Boundary Conditions on the Reacting Flow Field in a Swirl-Stabilized Burner at Dry and Humid Conditions,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 134(11), p. 111501. [CrossRef]
Paschereit, C. O., Schuermans, B., Polifke, W., and Mattson, O., 2002, “Measurement of Transfer Matrices and Source Terms of Premixed Flames,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 124(2), pp. 239–247. [CrossRef]
Schuermans, B., Güthe, F., Pennell, D., Guyot, D., and Paschereit, C. O., 2010, “Thermoacoustic Modeling of a Gas Turbine Using Transfer Functions Measured Under Full Engine Pressure,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 132(11), p. 111503. [CrossRef]
Balachandran, R., Ayoola, B. O., Kaminski, C. F., Dowling, A. P., and Mastorakos, E., 2005, “Experimental Investigation of the Nonlinear Response of Turbulent Premixed Flames to Imposed Inlet Velocity Oscillations,” Combust. Flame, 143(1–2), pp. 37–55. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Mechanisms that are involved in the transfer function of velocity fluctuations at the combustor inlet to the flame response. Investigated mechanisms are shaded gray.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Preliminary investigation of the influence of the tangential velocities (S = 0.8) on the eigenvalues of the axisymmetric (m = 0) mode

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Preliminary investigation of the influence of the Reynolds number on the eigenvalue α of the axisymmetric m = 0 mode at x/Dh = 0.25. The filled marker indicates the selected value of Re = 5000.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Streamwise development of the coherent fluctuation intensity K(x) at S = 0.8 for increasing forcing amplitudes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Flame response for acoustic forcing at f = 196 Hz for three swirl numbers

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Time-averaged flow field superimposed on the normalized OH*-chemiluminescence distribution at increasing forcing amplitudes. Solid lines indicate zero axial velocity. First row: S = 0.6. Second row: S = 0.8. Third row: S = 1. Fourth row: S = 0.8 nonreacting.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Phase-averaged flow fields and flame positions at four equidistant phase angles (S = 0.8, u'/u0 = 0.3). First row: streamlines of the coherent velocity superimposed on the normalized coherent through-plane vorticity. Second row: normalized phase-averaged OH*-chemiluminescence distribution and superimposed phase-averaged velocity vectors. Solid lines indicate zero phase-averaged axial velocity.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Sketch of the combustor test rig and the experimental setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Maximum coherent fluctuation intensity Kmax at increasing forcing amplitudes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Comparison of the measured to calculated coherent radial velocity distribution at S = 0.8 and u'/u0 = 0.1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

First row: amplitude ratio A of the m = 0 mode from the stability analysis. Second row: modified amplitude ratio A' from the triple decomposition.



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In