Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Controls, Diagnostics, and Instrumentation

Experimental and Numerical Investigation Into the Aerodynamics of a Novel Steam Turbine Valve and Its Field Application

[+] Author and Article Information
Giorgio Zanazzi

Alstom Power,
Brown Boveri Str. 7,
Baden 5400,Switzerland
e-mail: giorgio.zanazzi@power.alstom.com

Timothy Rice

Alstom Power,
Newbold Road,
Rugby CV21 2NH, UK
e-mail: tim.rice@power.alstom.com

Michael Sell

Alstom Power,
Brown Boveri Str. 7,
Baden 5400, Switzerland
e-mail: michael.sell@power.alstom.com

Colin Ridoutt

Alstom Power
Brown Boveri Str. 7,
Baden 5400, Switzerland
e-mail: colin.ridoutt@power.alstom.com

Contributed by the Controls, Diagnostics and Instrumentation Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received January 6, 2014; final manuscript received January 18, 2014; published online March 21, 2014. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 136(9), 091601 (Mar 21, 2014) (11 pages) Paper No: GTP-14-1002; doi: 10.1115/1.4026860 History: Received January 06, 2014; Revised January 18, 2014

Control valves are one of the key steam turbine components that guarantee operational safety in a power plant. There are two aerodynamic aspects, which are the current focus for the development of Alstom's valves. One is the reduction of the aerodynamic loss to increase the efficiency of the power plant. The other is operational flexibility, which is increasingly required to react faster to load requirements from the electric grid. This is becoming more important as power generation becomes increasingly decentralized, with a growing contribution from renewable energy sources. For this reason, a fast control loop is required for valve operation, which depends on an accurate linearization of the valve characteristic. In this paper the flow fields in an existing steam control valve have been analyzed and subsequently optimized using CFD techniques. The approach specifically designed for drilled strainers is further illustrated. Following the validation of the baseline design with model testing, an improved diffuser has been designed using CFD analysis and the resulting performance benefit has been confirmed with further testing. The grid frequency support requires control valve throttling. For this reason, an accurate prediction of the linearization table is extremely important to support the required response time limits. Further numerical work has been carried out with various opening positions of the valve, leading to an improved valve linearization characteristic. It is demonstrated that the numerical prediction of the linearization curve agrees very well with data obtained from operating power plants.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Clari, M. B., Polklas, T., and Joos, F., 2011, “Three-Dimensional Flow Separations in the Diffuser of a Steam Turbine Control Valve,” ASME Paper No. GT2011-45617. [CrossRef]
Yonezawa, K., Ogi, K., Takino, T., Tsujimoto, Y., Endo, T., Tezuka, K., Morita, R., and Inada, F., 2010, “Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Flow Induced Vibration of Steam Control Valve,” ASME Paper No. FEDSM-ICNMM2010-30676. [CrossRef]
Morita, R., and Inada, F., 2007, “Pressure Fluctuations Around the Steam Control Valve: Steam Experiments and CFD Calculations,” ASME Paper No. PVP2007-26444. [CrossRef]
Morita, R., Inada, F., Mori, M., Tezuka, K., and Tsujimoto, Y., 2007, “CFD Simulations and Experiments of Flow Fluctuations Around a Steam Control Valve,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 129(1), p. 48–54. [CrossRef]
Morita, R., Inada, F., Mori, M., Tezuka, K., and Tsujimoto, Y., 2005, “Flow Induced Vibration of a Steam Control Valve in Middle-Opening Condition,” ASME Paper No. PVP2005-71334. [CrossRef]
Gong, J. F., Ming, P. J., and Zhang, W. P., 2011, “LES of Turbulent Flows Through a Butterfly Valve,” AIP Conf. Proc., 1376(1), pp. 457–459. [CrossRef]
Cao, H. Z., Wang, F., Feng, J. L., and Tan, H. P., 2011, “Optimal Control of the Valve Based on Traveling Wave Method in the Water Hammer Process,” AIP Conf. Proc., 1376(1), pp. 436–440. [CrossRef]
Botros, K., 2011, “Spring Stiffness Selection Criteria for Nozzle Check Valves Employed in Compressor Stations,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 133(12), p. 122401. [CrossRef]
Liu, G. X., Lin, X. S., Yang, Q. X., Lai, L. L., and Hogg, B. W., 1997, “Investigation of Turbine Valving Control With Lyapunov Theory,” 4th International Conference on Advances in Power System Control, Operation and Management (APSCOM-97), Hong Kong, November 11–14, Vol. 2, pp. 505–508. [CrossRef]
Kang, S. G., and Suh, K. Y., 2009, “Dynamics Integrated Valve Analysis for Gas Turbine System,” ASME Paper No. ICONE17-75611. [CrossRef]
UK Grid Code Documentation, 2012, National Grid, London, http://www.nationalgrid.com/uk/Electricity/Codes/gridcode/gridcodedocs/
Baumgartner, F., 2010, “Porositätsparametern zur Simulation von Druckverlusten über Dampfsieben,” Bachelor thesis, ITFE, Fachhochschule Nordwestschweiz, Brugg-Windisch, Switzerland. [CrossRef]
Patel, R., Bhatti, T. S. and Kothari, D. P., 2003, “Improvement of Power System Transient Stability by Coordinated Operation of Fast Valving and Braking Resistor,” IEE Proc. Gener. Transm. Distrib., 150(3), pp. 311–316. [CrossRef]
Shahhosseini, M. R., Hajilouy-Benisi, A., and Rajabian, M., 2011, “A Numerical and Experimental Investigation of the Effects of Flow Ratio on the Flow and Performance Characteristics of a Twin Entry Radial Turbine,” ASME Paper No. GT2011-46308. [CrossRef]
Idelchik, I. E., 2005, Handbook of Hydraulic Resistance, Jaico Publishing House, Mumbai, India.
Zhang, C. H., MacAlpine, J. M. K., Leung, T. P., and Zhou, Q. J., 1995, “Nonlinear Control for Fast Turbine Valve Using Inverse System Method,” 3rd International Conference on Advances in Power System Control, Operation and Management (APSCOM 95), Hong Kong, November 9–11, pp. 94–97.
Martin, P., and Buxmann, J., 1968, “Verfahren zur Berechnung der Durchflusscharakteristik von Regelventilen bei Dampfturbinen,” Brennstoff Wärme Kraft, pp. 470–476 (in German).


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic view of the turbine inlet valve used in this study. Top half shown shut, bottom half shown open.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Test facility for valves at Alstom

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Structure and measurement locations of the test rig

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Typical strainer model and pattern of holes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Test model at FHNW Windisch

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Computational model of a direct calculation of a single strainer hole

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Computational mesh of single hole

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Grid independency study

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Computational domain for the porous model validation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Comparison between loss coefficient of a directly modeled bore and porous modeling

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Computational 3D domain of turbine inlet valve

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Computational meshes for turbine inlet valves

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Diffuser location inside the valve (a) and diffuser casing (red line) to be optimized (b)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Comparison of the diffuser shapes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Comparison of the relative diffuser area ratios

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Loss coefficient parameter for different diffuser designs at different operating points

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Comparison of relative changes in loss coefficient of different valve diffusers

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Location of visualization planes in the 3D CFD calculation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Comparison of flow Mach number in diffuser and outlet ring chamber between baseline and design 1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

Schematic of the loss breakdown along the flow path

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 21

Analysis of loss creation along the flow path

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 22

Experimental data of valve characteristics and turbine operating conditions with a typical steam turbine valve

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 23

Example of a CFD result with 20% relative lift stroke

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 24

Procedure of the CFD-based valve linearization

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 25

Comparison between on-site data and CFD prediction of valve lift over mass flow



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In