Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Turbomachinery

Propeller Synchrophase Angle Optimization of Turboprop-Driven Aircraft—An Experimental Investigation

[+] Author and Article Information
Xianghua Huang

Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory
of Aerospace Power System,
College of Energy and Power,
Nanjing University of Aeronautics
and Astronautics,
No. 29 Yudao Street,
Nanjing 210016, China
e-mail: xhhuang@nuaa.edu.cn

Long Sheng

Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory
of Aerospace Power System,
College of Energy and Power,
Nanjing University of Aeronautics
and Astronautics,
No. 29 Yudao Street,
Nanjing 210016, China
e-mail: shenglong2760@sina.com

Yangyang Wang

Shenyang Aero engine Research Institute,
No. 1 Wanlian Road,
Shenyang 110015, China
e-mail: wangyikai1201@gmail.com

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Turbomachinery Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received April 27, 2014; final manuscript received May 5, 2014; published online June 12, 2014. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 136(11), 112606 (Jun 12, 2014) (9 pages) Paper No: GTP-14-1210; doi: 10.1115/1.4027644 History: Received April 27, 2014; Revised May 05, 2014

Propeller synchrophasing is an effective way of reducing interior noise and vibration of turboprop-driven aircraft. However, synchrophasing has achieved limited success in practice for the reason that the predetermined phase angles are not acoustically optimized for maximum noise reduction during all flight conditions. An investigation has been conducted out which includes two folds: first, the noise vector based on laboratory experimental data has been modeled and second, optimal phase to acquire minimum noise is obtained via optimization search. An improved identification method of vector noise model which can be less dependent to noise phase message is presented. Compared with traditional methods, this method can greatly reduce the real-time requirement between phase optimization model and control model or sound acquiring model, so it can eliminate the influence which communication delay brings on identification precision. A synchrophasing experimental platform is established to verify the vector noise modeling. It adopts two propellers-driven servo motors to simulate the interior noise environment of the aircraft. The influence of the date sampling condition on identification is also researched. Ant colony optimization with two improvements is applied to phase optimization of four propellers. Simulation results show that the improved algorithm requires much less calculation.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Burger, C., Hartfield, R., and Burkhalter, J., 2007, “Performance and Noise Optimization of a Propeller Using the Vortex Lattice Method and a Genetic Algorithm,” 3rd AIAA Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Specialist Conference, Honolulu, HI, April 23–26, AIAA Paper No. 2007-1883, pp. 23–26. [CrossRef]
Gennaretti, M., Iemma, U., and Testa, C., 2006, “Prediction of Sound Scattered by Moving Bodies With Applications to Propeller-Driven Airplanes,” 12th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Cambridge, MA, May 8–10, AIAA Paper No. 2006-2475. [CrossRef]
Polacsek, C., Spiegel, P., Boyle, F., Eaton, J., Brouwer, H., and Nijboer, R., 2000, “Noise Computation of High-Speed Propeller-Driven Aircraft,” 21st AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference, Lahaina, HI, June 12–14, AIAA Paper No. 2000-2086. [CrossRef]
Marino, L., 2010, “Experimental Analysis of UAV-Propellers Noise,” 16th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Stockholm, AIAA Paper No. 2010-3854. [CrossRef]
Li, X., Yang, X., and Hu, Z., 1991, “Aeroacoustical Modification of a Propeller,” J. Aerosp. Power, 6(4), pp. 317–319 (in Chinese).
Mathur, G. P., 1995, “Active Control of Aircraft Cabin Noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 97(5), p. 3267–3284. [CrossRef]
Wickramasinghe, V., Zimcik, D., and Chen, Y., 2004, “A Novel Adaptive Structural Impedance Control Approach to Suppress Aircraft Vibration and Noise,” National Research Council of Canada, Institute for Aerospace Research, Ottawa, Technical Report AD-A446767.
Magliozzi, B., 1983, “Synchrophasing for Cabin Noise Reduction of Propeller-Driven Airplanes,” 8th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference, Atlanta, GA, April 11–13, AIAA Paper No. 83-0717 [CrossRef]. [CrossRef]
Jones, J. D., and Fuller, C. R., 1986, “An Experimental Investigation of the Interior Noise Control Effects of Propeller Synchrophasing,” National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Langley Research Center, Langley, VA, Report No. NASA-CR-178185.
Fuller, C. R., 1984, “Noise Control Characteristics of Synchrophasing—An Analytical Investigation,” 9th AIAA/NASA Aeroacoustics Conference, Williamsburg, VA, October 15–17, AIAA Paper No. 84-2369, pp. 1063–1068. [CrossRef]
Pla, F., Goodman, G., Ranaudo, R., and Silcox, R., 1993, “Cabin Noise Cancellation Using Active RPM Control-OV-10A Flight Test Results,” 15th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference, Long Beach, CA, October 25–27, AIAA Paper No. 93-4438. [CrossRef]
Ewing, M. S., Kirk, M. A., and Swearingen, J. D., 2001, “Beech 1900D Flight Test to Characterize Propeller Noise on the Fuselage Exterior,” 7th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Maastricht, The Netherlands, May 28–30, AIAA Paper No. 2001-2110. [CrossRef]
Hammond, D., McKinley, R., and Hale, B., 1998, “Noise Reduction Efforts for Special Operations C-130 Aircraft Using Active Synchrophaser Control,” Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, Technical Report No. AD-A434029.
Jones, J. D., and Fuller, C. R., 1984, “Noise Control Characteristics of Synchrophasing—An Experimental Investigation,” 9th AIAA/NASA Aeroacoustics Conference, WiIIiamsburg, VA, October 15–17, AIAA Paper No. 84-2370, pp. 1271–1276. [CrossRef]
Magliozzi, B., 1995, “Adaptive Synchrophaser for Reducing Aircraft Cabin Noise and Vibration,” U.S. Patent No. 5,453,943.
Johnston, J. F., Donham, R. E., and Guinn, W. A., 1981, “Propeller Signatures and Their Use,” J. Aircr., 18(11), pp. 934–942. [CrossRef]
Zoutendijk, G., 1970, “Nonlinear Programming, Computational Methods,” Integer and Nonlinear Programming, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 37–86.
Zhifeng, D., and Lanping, C., 2005, “A Mixed HS-DY Conjugate Gradient Methods,” Math. Numer. Sin., 27(4), pp. 429–436 (in Chinese).
Blunt, D. M., and Rebbechi, B., 2007, “Propeller Synchrophase Angle Optimisation Study,” 13th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Rome, AIAA Paper No. 2007-3584. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Noise characters of time domain and frequency domain (a) waveform of propeller noise and (b) frequency property of propeller noise

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Noise vector signatures under single frequency condition

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Structure of platform

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Photograph of experiment platform

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Noise waveform of experiment data versus model data

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Noise waveform of experiment data versus model data in case of with zero pulse delay

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Relationship between modeling error and data group speed deviation on identification precision

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Influence of data samples cycles and speed deviation on identification precision

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Influence of speed deviation on identification precision

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

One-dimension spread chart of noise-phase set of four-propeller aircraft

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Local zoom chart of Fig. 10

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Steps comparison of improved ACO



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In