Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Structures and Dynamics

Investigation on Material's Fatigue Property Variation Among Different Regions of Directional Solidification Turbine Blades—Part I: Fatigue Tests on Full Scale Blades

[+] Author and Article Information
Xiaojun Yan

School of Energy and Power Engineering,
Beihang University,
Beijing 100191, China;
Collaborative Innovation Center of
Advanced Aero-Engine,
Beijing 100191, China
e-mail: yanxiaojun@buaa.edu.cn

Xia Chen

School of Energy and Power Engineering,
Beihang University,
Beijing 100191, China
e-mail: zuoweicat@126.com

Ruijie Sun

School of Energy and Power Engineering,
Beihang University,
Beijing 100191, China
e-mail: srj_0515@163.com

Ying Deng

School of Energy and Power Engineering,
Beihang University,
Beijing 100191, China
e-mail: yingdeng@sjp.buaa.edu.cn

Lianshan Lin

Oak Ridge National Laboratory,
Oak Ridge, TN 37831
e-mail: lianshanlin@hotmail.com

Jingxu Nie

School of Energy and Power Engineering,
Beihang University,
Beijing 100191, China
e-mail: buaa405@163.com

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Structures and Dynamics Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received June 2, 2014; final manuscript received June 5, 2014; published online July 22, 2014. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 136(10), 102502 (Jul 22, 2014) (8 pages) Paper No: GTP-14-1262; doi: 10.1115/1.4027928 History: Received June 02, 2014; Revised June 05, 2014

At present, directional solidification (DS) made blades are commonly used in high performance turbine for their better high temperature mechanical, especially in creep properties compared with the equiaxed grain (EG) blades made by conventional casting method. To predict DS blades' fatigue life accurately, one of the practical ways is to conduct tests on full-scale blades in a laboratory/bench environment. In this investigation, two types of full scale turbine blades, which are made from DZ22B by DS method and K403 by conventional casting method, respectively, were selected to conduct high temperature combined low and high cycle fatigue (CCF) tests on a special design test rig, to evaluate the increase of fatigue life benefitted from material change. Experimental results show that different from EG blades, DS blades' fracture section is not located on the position where the maximum stress point lies. By comparing fatigue test results of the two types of blade, it can be found that the fatigue properties among different regions of the DS blade are different, and its fatigue damage is not only related to the stress field, but also affected by different parts material's fatigue properties.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Joseph, R. D., 1990, “Properties and Selection,” Metals Handbook, Vol. 1, 10th ed., ASTM International, Metals Park, OH, pp. 981–1006.
McKellen, M., Chen, S. Q., and Chen, R. Z., 1989, Directional Solidification of High Temperature Material, Aviation Industry, Beijing.
Chen, R. Z., 2002, “Review and Prospect of Developments of Cast Superalloys and Technology of Aeroengine Turbine Blade,” Aeronaut. Manuf. Technol., 26(2), pp. 19–23. [CrossRef]
He, Y. H., and Su, B., 2005, “Mechancial Property Status of Chinese Aeroengine Turbine Blade Materials,”Aeroengine, 31(2), pp. 51–54. [CrossRef]
Schweizer, C., Seifert, T., Nieweg, B., Von Hartrott, P., and Riedel, H., 2011, “Mechanisms and Modelling of Fatigue Crack Growth Under Combined Low and High Cycle Fatigue Loading,” Int. J. Fatigue, 33(2), pp. 194–202. [CrossRef]
Hou, N., Wen, Z., Yu, Q., and Yue, Z., 2009, “Application of a Combined High and Low Cycle Fatigue Life Model on Life Prediction of SC Blade,” Int. J. Fatigue, 31(4), pp. 616–619. [CrossRef]
Filippini, M., Foletti, S., and Pasquero, G., 2010, “Combined Cycle Fatigue of Gas Turbine Blade Materials at Elevated Temperature,” Strain, 46(4), pp. 374–381. [CrossRef]
Yan, X. J., and Nie, J. X., 2008, “Creep-Fatigue Tests on Full Scale Directionally Solidified Turbine Blades,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 130(4), p. 044501. [CrossRef]
Weser, S., Gampe, U., Raddatz, M., Parchem, R., and Lukas, P., 2011, “Advanced Experimental and Analytical Investigations on Combined Cycle Fatigue (CCF) of Conventional Cast and Single-Crystal Gas Turbine Blades,” ASME Paper No. GT2011-45171. [CrossRef]
Issler, S., and Roos, E., 2003, “Numerical and Experimental Investigations Into Life Assessment of Blade–Disc Connections of Gas Turbines,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 226(2), pp. 155–164. [CrossRef]
Oakley, S., and Nowell, D., 2007, “Prediction of the Combined High- and Low-Cycle Fatigue Performance of Gas Turbine Blades After Foreign Object Damage,” Int. J. Fatigue, 29(1), pp. 69–80. [CrossRef]
SwRI Gas Turbine Technology Center, 2013, “Diagnostic Methods to Detect and Avoid High-Cycle Fatigue Damage,” Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX, accessed June 24, 2013, http://www.swri.org/4org/d18/mechflu/planteng/gasturb/audit.htm
Witek, L., 2009, “Experimental Crack Propagation and Failure Analysis of the First Stage Compressor Blade Subjected to Vibration,” Eng. Failure Anal., 16(7), pp. 2163–2170. [CrossRef]
Xie, M., Soni, S. R., Cross, C. J., and Terborg, G. E., 2004, “Multiaxial High Cycle Fatigue Test System,” U.S. Patent No. US20020162400.
Hu, D. Y., and Wang, R. Q., 2013,“Combined Fatigue Experiments on Full Scale Turbine Components,” Aircr. Eng. Aerosp. Technol., 85(1), pp. 4–9. [CrossRef]
Cross, C. J., 2000, “Multi-Axial Testing of Gas Turbine Engine Blades,” 36th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, Huntsville, AL, July 17–19, AIAA Paper No. 2000-3641. [CrossRef]
Lu, R., and Liao, Z., 1997, “Briefing on Vibration Fatigue of Engine Turbine Blade,” Hongdu Science and Technology, 1997(1), pp. 19–23.
Sun, R. J., 2011, “Structure Design of Directional Solidified Turbine Blade Considering Grain Structure Variation Among Different Locations,” Ph.D. thesis, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing.
Kang, N., Yan, X.-J., Li, X.-F., and Liu, Z.-N., 2010, “Numerical Calculation and Measurement of the Vibration Stress in Combined High and Low Cycle Fatigue Tests,” Gas Turbine Exp. Res., 23(4), pp. 22–25. [CrossRef]
Sun, R. J., Yan, X. J., and Nie, J. X., 2012, “Inverse Method for Estimating the Vibration Stress of Turbine Blades Based on Combined High- and Low-Cycle Fatigue Tests,” J. Aerosp. Power, 27(2), pp. 289–294,
Sun, R. J., Yan, X. J., and Nie, J. X., 2011, “Failure Characteristics of Directional Solidification Turbine Blade Under High Tempereture Low Cycle Fatigue Load,” Acta Aeronaut. Astronaut. Sin., 32(2), pp. 337–343. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

A typical turbine blade

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

The static stress distribution: (a) DZ22B blade and (b) K403 blade

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

The dangerous vibration mode's stress distribution: (a) DZ22B blades and (b) K403 blades

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Loading method and principle of the CCF test system: (a) directions of LCF and HCF loadings, (b) LCF loading transferring path, and (c) HCF loading transferring path. Notes: 1—outer clamp, 2—vibration exciting plate, 3—inner clamp, 4—test blade, 5—ball bearing, 6—real turbine disk, 7—electromagnetic exciter, 8—high-frequency eddy current induction coil, and 9—electron microscope.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

LCF test calibration: (a) paste locations of the strain gauges and (b) comparisons between measured readings and FEM results

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Schematic diagram of vibration amplitude monitoring

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

CCF test system: 1—high-frequency eddy current induction coil; 2—electromagnetic exciter; 3—electron microscope; 4—outer clamp; 5—low cycle loading links; 6—vibration exciting plate; 7—inner clamp; 8—ball bearing; 9—real turbine disk; 10—cooling water pipe; 11—disk fixing rod; and 12—test machine frame

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

CCF test load spectrum

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Illustration of the reverse method

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

The approximate S-N curves of position 1 and position 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Stress distribution comparison between position 1 and position 2: (a) DZ22B blade and (b) K403 blade

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

The stress distribution of turbine blades without HCF load: (a) DZ22B blades and (b) K403 blades

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Fracture position statistics of DZ22B blades

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Main fracture positions of test blades



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In