Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Turbomachinery

Thermodynamics and Fluid Mechanics of a Closed Blade Cascade Wind Tunnel for Organic Vapors

[+] Author and Article Information
Felix Reinker

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Muenster University of Applied Sciences,
Stegerwaldstr. 39,
Steinfurt 48565, Germany
e-mail: f.reinker@fh-muenster.de

Karsten Hasselmann

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Muenster University of Applied Sciences,
Stegerwaldstr. 39,
Steinfurt 48565, Germany
e-mail: hasselmann@fh-muenster.de

Stefan aus der Wiesche

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Muenster University of Applied Sciences,
Stegerwaldstr. 39,
Steinfurt 48565, Germany
e-mail: wiesche@fh-muenster.de

Eugeny Y. Kenig

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Paderborn,
Pohlweg 55,
Paderborn 33098, Germany
e-mail: eugeny.kenig@upd.de

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Turbomachinery Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received July 21, 2015; final manuscript received August 14, 2015; published online October 27, 2015. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 138(5), 052601 (Oct 27, 2015) (8 pages) Paper No: GTP-15-1354; doi: 10.1115/1.4031390 History: Received July 21, 2015; Revised August 14, 2015

The organic Rankine cycle (ORC) offers great potential for waste heat recovery and use of low-temperature sources for power generation. However, the ORC thermal efficiency is limited by the relatively low-temperature level, and it is, therefore, of major importance to design ORC components with high efficiencies and minimized losses. The use of organic fluids creates new challenges for turbine design, due to dense gas behavior and the low speed of sound. The design and performance predictions for steam and gas turbines have been initially based on measurements and numerical simulations of flow through two-dimensional cascades of blades. In case of ORC turbines and related fluids, such an approach requires the use of a specially designed closed cascade wind tunnel. In this contribution the design and process engineering of a continuous running wind tunnel for organic vapors is presented. The wind tunnel can be operated with heavy weight organic working fluids within a broad range of pressure and temperature levels. For this reason, the use of classical design rules for atmospheric wind tunnels is limited. The thermodynamic cycle process in the closed wind tunnel is modeled, and simulated by means of a professional power plant analysis tool, including a database for the ORC fluid properties under consideration. The wind tunnel is designed as a pressure vessel system and this leads to significant challenges particular for the employed wide angle diffuser, settling chamber, and nozzle. Detailed computational fluid dynamics (CFD) was performed in order to optimize the important wind tunnel sections.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Adam, A. W. , 1995, Organic Rankine Engines, Wiley, New York, pp. 2157–2161.
Schuster, A. , Karellas, S. , Kakaras, E. , and Spliethoff, H. , 2009, “ Energetic and Economic Investigation of Organic Rankine Cycle Applications,” Appl. Therm. Eng., 29(8–9), pp. 1809–1817. [CrossRef]
Chen, H. , Goswami, D. Y. , and Stefanakos, E. K. , 2010, “ A Review of Thermodynamic Cycles and Working Fluids for the Conversion of Low-Grade Heat,” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 14(9), pp. 3059–3067. [CrossRef]
Invernizzi, C. M. , 2013, Closed Power Cycles, Springer, London, Chap. 2.
Congedo, P. M. , Cinnella, P. , and Corre, C. , 2009, “ Shape Optimization for Dense Gas Flows in Turbine Cascades,” Computational Fluid Dynamics 2006, H. Deconinck , and E. Dick , eds., Springer, Berlin, pp. 555–560.
Marconcini, M. , Rubechini, F. , Arnone, A. , Del Greco, A. S. , and Biagi, R. , 2012, “ Aerodynamic Investigation of a High Pressure Ratio Turbo-Expander for Organic Rankine Cycle Applications,” ASME Paper No. GT2012-69409.
Termuehlen, H. , 2001, 100 Years of Power Plant Development. Focus on Steam and Gas Turbines as Prime Movers, ASME Press, New York.
Li, M. , Wang, J. , Gao, L. , Niu, X. , and Dai, Y. , 2012, “ Performance Evaluation of a Turbine Used in a Regenerative Organic Rankine Cycle,” ASME Paper No. GT2012-68441.
Kosowski, K. , Piwowarski, M. , Stepien, R. , and Wlodarski, W. , 2012, “ Design and Investigations of a Micro-Turbine Flow Part,” ASME Paper No. GT2012-69222.
Erhart, T. G. , Eicker, U. , and Infield, D. , 2013, “ Influence of Condenser Conditions on Organic Rankine Cycle Load Characteristics,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 135(4), p. 042301. [CrossRef]
Bloch, H. P. , and Singh, M. P. , 2008, Steam Turbines: Design, Applications, and Re-Rating, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, Chap. 1.
Dixon, S. L. , 1998, Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics of Turbomachinery, 4th ed., Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, MA, Chap. 3. http://www.steag-systemtechnologies.com/fileadmin/user_upload/steag-systemtechnologies.com/unsere_leistungen/EBSILON_R_Professional/PDB_EBSILON_System_Engineering_and_Design_eng.pdf
STEAG, 2014, “ EBSILON®Professional,” STEAG Energy Services GmbH, Essen, Germany, http://www.steag-systemtechnologies.com/ebsilonprofessional0.html
Merle, X. , and Cinnella, P. , 2014, “ Bayesian Quantification of Thermodynamic Uncertainties in Dense Gas Flows,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 134, pp. 305–323. [CrossRef]
Colonna, P. , Rebay, S. , Harnick, J. , and Guardone, A. , 2006, “ Real-Gas Effects in ORC Turbine Flow Simulations: Influence of Thermodynamic Models on Flow Fields and Performance Parameters,” European Conference on Computational Fluid Dyanamics (ECCOMAS CFD 2006), Egmond aan Zee, The Netherlands, Sept. 5–8.
Traupel, W. , 1952, “ Zur dynamik realer Gase,” Forsch. Geb. Ingenieurwes., 18(1), pp. 3–9. [CrossRef]
Hasselmann, K. , Reinker, F. , aus der Wiesche, S. , Kenig, E. , Dubberke, F. , and Vrabec, J. , 2014, “ Performance Predictions of Axial Turbines for Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) Applications Based on Measurements of the Flow Through Two-Dimensional Cascades of Blades,” ASME Paper No. POWER2014-32098.
Thompson, P. A. , 1971, “ A Fundamental Derivative in Gasdynamics,” Phys. Fluids, 14(9), pp. 1843–1849. [CrossRef]
Cramer, M. S. , and Tarkenton, G. M. , 1992, “ Transonic Flows of Bethe-Zel'dovich-Thompson Fluids,” J. Fluid Mech., 240(1), pp. 197–228. [CrossRef]
Lambrakis, K. C. , 1972, “ Existence of Real Fluids With a Negative Fundamental Derivative Γ,” Phys. Fluids, 15(5), pp. 933–935. [CrossRef]
Colonna, P. , and Guardone, A. , 2006, “ Molecular Interpretation of Nonclassical Gas Dynamics of Dense Vapors Under the van der Waals Model,” Phys. Fluids, 18(5), p. 056101. [CrossRef]
Cogswell, F. J. , Gerlach, D. W. , Wagner, T. C. , and Mulugeta, J. , 2011, “ Design of an Organic Rankine Cycle for Waste Heat Recovery From a Portable Diesel Generator,” ASME Paper No. IMECE2011-65489.
Huber, M. L. , Laesecke, A. , and Perkins, R. A. , 2003, “ Model for the Viscosity and Thermal Conductivity of Refrigerants, Including a New Correlation for the Viscosity of R134a,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 42(13), pp. 3163–3178. [CrossRef]
Colonna, P. , Guardone, A. , Nannan, N. R. , and Zamfirescu, C. , 2008, “ Design of the Dense Gas Flexible Asymmetric Shock Tube,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 130(3), p. 034501. [CrossRef]
Spinelli, A. , Pini, M. , Dossena, V. , Gaetani, P. , and Casella, F. , 2013, “ Design, Simulation, and Construction of a Test Rig for Organic Vapors,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 135(4), p. 042304. [CrossRef]
Spinelli, A. , Dossena, V. , and Gaetani, P. , 2013, “ Start-Up of a Test Rig for Organic Vapors,” 2nd International Seminar on ORC Power Systems (ASME ORC 2013), Rotterdam, The Netherlands, Oct. 7–8.
Barlow, J. B. , Rae, W. H. , and Pope, A. , 1999, Low Speed Wind Tunnel Testing, 3rd ed., Wiley, New York, Chap. 3.
Sargison, J. E. , Walker, G. J. , and Rossi, R. , 2004, “ Design and Calibration of a Wind Tunnel With a Two Dimensional Contraction,” 15th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference, (afms 15), Sydney, Australia, Dec. 13–17, Paper No. AFMC00183.
Liepmann, H. W. , and Roshko, A. , 2001, Elements of Gasdynamics, Dover Publications, New York, Chap. 5.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Three-dimensional model of the closed circuit wind tunnel for ORC fluids

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Compressibility factor Z as function of the temperature T with lines of constant entropy s (based on refprop data for Novec649®)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Types of working fluids

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Temperature—specific entropy plane, showing the vapor saturation line of Novec 649®, the maximum temperature and maximum pressure for the facility, the planned area of operation (bigger ellipse) and the position of the presented EBSILON® model (smaller ellipse)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Flow behavior and pressure drop of the diffuser with two (a) and four (b) screens

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Influence of screens in the diffuser on the velocity profile in the settling chamber

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Comparison of the ideal shape, the geometrically optimized shape, and the flow optimized shape of the contraction zone

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

(a) CFD analysis of the geometrically optimized shape, (b) critical zone with the increase of speed, and (c) critical zone after the flow field optimization

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

EBSILON® Model of the closed circuit wind tunnel including numbered blocks for identification in the thermodynamic cycle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Thermodynamic cycle of the closed circuit wind tunnel for load-free conditions in the test section, drawn in a specific enthalpy—specific entropy plane

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Thermodynamic cycle of the closed circuit wind tunnel for loaded conditions in the test section, drawn in a specific enthalpy—specific entropy plane



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In