Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Turbomachinery

Design Considerations for Tip Clearance Control and Measurement on a Turbine Rainbow Rotor With Multiple Blade Tip Geometries

[+] Author and Article Information
S. Lavagnoli

Turbomachinery and Propulsion Department,
von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics,
Rhode Saint Genèse,
Brussels BE-1640, Belgium
e-mail: lavagnoli@vki.ac.be

C. De Maesschalck

Turbomachinery and Propulsion Department,
von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics,
Rhode Saint Genèse,
Brussels BE-1640, Belgium
e-mail: cis.demaesschalck@gmail.com

V. Andreoli

Turbomachinery and Propulsion Department,
von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics,
Rhode Saint Genèse,
Brussels BE-1640, Belgium
e-mail: vale.andreoli@gmail.com

1Present address: Zucrow Laboratories, Purdue University, 500 Allison Road, West Lafayette, IN 47907.

Contributed by the Turbomachinery Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received July 20, 2016; final manuscript received August 20, 2016; published online November 16, 2016. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 139(4), 042603 (Nov 16, 2016) (10 pages) Paper No: GTP-16-1352; doi: 10.1115/1.4034919 History: Received July 20, 2016; Revised August 20, 2016

The accurate design, control, and monitoring of the running gaps between static and moving components are vital to preserve the mechanical integrity and ensure the correct functioning of any compact rotating machinery. Throughout engine service, the rotor tip clearance undergoes large variations due to installation tolerances or as the result of different thermal expansion rates of the blades, rotor disk, and casing during speed transients. Hence, active tip clearance control concepts and engine health-monitoring systems rely on precise real-time gap measurements. Moreover, this tip gap information is crucial for engine development programs to verify the mechanical and aerothermal designs and validate numerical predictions. This paper presents an overview of the critical design requirements for testing engine-representative blade tip flows in a rotating turbine facility. This paper specifically focuses on the challenges related with the design, verification, and monitoring of the running tip clearance during a turbine experiment. In the large-scale turbine facility of the von Karman Institute, a rainbow rotor was mounted for simultaneous aerothermal testing of multiple blade tip geometries. The tip shapes are a selection of high-performance squealer-like and contoured blade tip designs. On the rotor disk, the blades are arranged in seven sectors operating at different clearance levels from 0.5 up to 1.5% of the blade span. Prior to manufacturing, the blade geometry was modified to compensate for the radial deformation of the rotating assembly under centrifugal loads. A numerical procedure was implemented to minimize the residual unbalance of the rotor in rainbow configuration and to optimize the placement of every single airfoil within each sector. Subsequently, the rotor was balanced in situ to reduce the vibrations and satisfy the international standards for high balance quality. Three fast-response capacitive probes located at distinct circumferential locations around the rotor annulus measured the single-blade tip clearance in rotation. Additionally, the minimum running blade clearance is captured with wear gauges located at five axial positions along the blades chord. The capacitance probes are self-calibrated using a multitest strategy at several rotational speeds. The in situ calibration methodology and dedicated data reduction techniques allow the accurate measurement of the distance between the turbine casing and the local blade tip features (rims and cavities) for each rotating airfoil separately. General guidelines are given for the design and calibration of a tip clearance measurement system that meets the required measurement accuracy and resolution in function of the sensor uncertainty, nominal tip clearance levels, and tip seal geometry.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Bunker, R. S. , 2006, “ Axial Turbine Blade Tips: Function, Design, and Durability,” J. Propul. Power, 22(2), pp. 271–285. [CrossRef]
Denton, J. D. , 1993, “ Loss Mechanisms in Turbomachines,” ASME J. Turbomach., 115(4), pp. 621–656. [CrossRef]
Booth, T. C. , 1985, “ Importance of Tip Clearance Flows in Turbine Design,” Tip Clearance Effects in Axial Turbomachines (Lecture Series), von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics, Rhode-Saint-Genese, Belgium.
Glezer, B. , 2004, “ Transient Tip Clearance Analysis and Measurement Techniques,” Turbine Blade Tip Design and Tip Clearance Treatment (Lecture Series), von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics, Rhode-Saint-Genese, Belgium.
Dhadwal, H. S. , and Kurkov, A. P. , 1999, “ Dual-Laser Probe Measurement of Blade-Tip Clearance,” ASME J. Turbomach., 121(3), pp. 481–486. [CrossRef]
Pfister, T. , Büttner, L. , Czarske, J. , Krain, H. , and Schodl, R. , 2006, “ Turbo Machine Tip Clearance and Vibration Measurements Using a Fibre Optic Laser Doppler Position Sensor,” Meas. Sci. Technol., 17(7), pp. 1693–1705. [CrossRef]
Maslovskiy, A. , 2008, “ Microwave Turbine Tip Clearance Measuring System for Gas Turbine Engines,” ASME Paper No. GT2008-50354.
Tagashira, T. , Sugiyama, N. , Matsuda, Y. , and Matsuki, M. , 1997, “ Measurement of Blade Tip Clearance Using an Ultrasonic Sensor,” AIAA Paper No. 97-0165.
Hall, L. C. , and Jones, B. E. , 1976, “ An Investigation Into the Use of a Cone-Jet Sensor for Clearance and Eccentricity Measurement in Turbomachinery,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., 190(1976), pp. 23–30. [CrossRef]
Hastings, M. M. , and Jensen, H. B. , 1996, “ A Novel Proximity Probe Unaffected by Shaft Electromagnetic Properties,” ASME Paper No. 96-GT-004.
Barranger, J. P. , 1978, “ An In-Place Calibration Technique to Extend the Temperature Capability of Capacitance Sensor System,” Society of Automotive Engineers Aerospace Meeting, San Diego, CA, SAE Paper No. 781003.
Demers, R. N. , 1986, “ Compressor Blade Clearance Measurement Using Capacitance and Phase Lock Techniques,” AGARD Advanced Instrumentation Aero Engine Components, Philadelphia, PA, n.b. 399, p. 30.
Barranger, J. P. , 1987, “ Low-Cost FM Oscillator for Capacitance Type of Blade Tip Clearance Measurement System,” NASA Technical Paper No. 2746.
Chivers, J. W. H. , 1989, “ A Technique for the Measurement of Blade Tip Clearance in a Gas Turbine,” AIAA Paper No. 89-2916.
Roberts, R. R. , 2007, “ The Potentials of Tip-Timing and Tip Clearance Measurements for Aero Propulsion Gas Turbines,” Tip Timing and Tip Clearance Problems in Turbomachines (Lecture Series), von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics, Rhode-Saint-Génese, Belgium.
Paniagua, G. , Sieverding, C. H. , and Arts, T. , 2013, “ Review of the von Karman Institute Compression Tube Facility for Turbine Research,” ASME Paper No. GT2013-95984.
De Maesschalck, C. , Lavagnoli, S. , Paniagua, G. , Verstraete, T. , Olive, R. , and Picot, P. , 2015, “ Heterogeneous Optimization Strategies for Carved and Squealer-Like Turbine Blade Tips,” ASME J. Turbomach., 138(12), p. 121011. [CrossRef]
Yoon, S. , Curtis, E. , Denton, J. , and Longley, J. , 2010, “ The Effect of Clearance on Shrouded and Unshrouded Turbines at Two Levels of Reaction,” ASME J. Turbomach., 136(2), p. 021013. [CrossRef]
Lavagnoli, S. , Paniagua, G. , Tulkens, M. , and Steiner, A. , 2011, “ High-Fidelity Rotor Gap Measurements in a Short-Duration Turbine Rig,” Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 27, pp. 590–603. [CrossRef]
Zhang, Q. , and He, L. , 2013, “ Tip-Shaping for HP Turbine Blade Aerothermal Performance Management,” ASME J. Turbomach., 135(5), p. 051025. [CrossRef]
Zai, W. , and Gong, W.-B. , 1994, “ Optimal Blade Placement for Large Turbofan Balancing,” Fourth International Conference on Computer Integrated Manufacturing and Automation Technology (CIMAT), Troy, NY, Oct. 10–12, pp. 261–266.
ISO, 2003, “ Mechanical Vibration—Balance Quality Requirements for Rotors in a Constant (Rigid) State—Part 1: Specification and Verification of Balance Tolerances,” International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, Standard No. ISO 1940-1:2003.
Vance, J. M. , 1988, Rotordynamics of Turbomachinery, Wiley, New York.
Lavagnoli, S. , Paniagua, G. , De Maesschalck, C. , and Yasa, T. , 2013, “ Analysis of the Unsteady Overtip Casing Heat Transfer in a High Speed Turbine,” ASME J. Turbomach., 135(3), p. 031027. [CrossRef]
Sheard, A. G. , 2011, “ Blade by Blade Tip Clearance Measurement,” Int. J. Rotating Mach., 2011, p. 516128. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Turbine test rig layout and zoom of the flow path

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

View of the turbine assembly (a) and the rainbow-rotor configuration (b)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Representation of the investigated rotor tip designs

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Hot–cold blade conversion: blade FE analysis (a), inverse compensation (b), and eventual radial deformation (c)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Blade weight difference compared to the sector average mass (left) and global mean value (right)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Blade positioning optimization strategy

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Results of the unbalance optimization procedure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Location of the accelerometers (a), vibration measurements (b), and four-point balancing methodology (c)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Turbine instrumentation location (a), probe types (b), insert types (c), and eventual blade coverage (d)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Capacitance-based proximity measurement system (a) and sensor error as a function of normalized working range (b) [19]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Static measurements of the blade radius at three distinct positions on the tip surface

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Deformation of the blade with increasing rpm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Analysis of the tip clearance signal and identification of different blade tip features

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Self-calibration of the capacitance–sensor for the suction side rim of all the squealer-like blade sets

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Blade-to-blade variation of tip radius for different tip features measured under running (5000 rpm) and rest conditions at position B



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In