Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Turbomachinery

Innovative Turbine Stator Well Design Using a Kriging-Assisted Optimization Method

[+] Author and Article Information
Julien Pohl

Marie Curie Fellow,
School of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Leeds,
Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
e-mail: jul.pohl@gmx.de

Harvey M. Thompson

Computational Fluid Dynamics,
School of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Leeds,
Leeds LS2 9JT, UK

Ralf C. Schlaps

Design Systems Engineering,
Rolls-Royce PLC,
Derby DE24 8BJ, UK

Shahrokh Shahpar

CFD Methods,
Rolls-Royce plc.,
Derby DE24 8BJ, UK

Vincenzo Fico, Gary A. Clayton

Thermo-Fluid Systems,
Rolls-Royce plc.,
Derby DE24 8BJ, UK

Contributed by the Turbomachinery Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received September 28, 2016; final manuscript received October 6, 2016; published online February 14, 2017. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 139(7), 072603 (Feb 14, 2017) (9 pages) Paper No: GTP-16-1472; doi: 10.1115/1.4035288 History: Received September 28, 2016; Revised October 06, 2016

At present, it is a common practice to expose engine components to main annulus air temperatures exceeding the thermal material limit in order to increase the overall engine performance and to minimize the engine specific fuel consumption. To prevent overheating of the materials and thus the reduction of component life, an internal flow system is required to cool and protect the critical engine parts. Previous studies have shown that the insertion of a deflector plate in turbine cavities leads to a more effective use of reduced cooling air, since the coolant is fed more effectively into the disk boundary layer. This paper describes a flexible design parameterization of an engine representative turbine stator well geometry with stationary deflector plate and its implementation within an automated design optimization process using automatic meshing and steady-state computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Special attention and effort is turned to the flexibility of the parameterization method in order to reduce the number of design variables to a minimum on the one hand, but increasing the design space flexibility and generality on the other. Finally, the optimized design is evaluated using a previously validated conjugate heat transfer method (by coupling a finite element analysis (FEA) to CFD) and compared against both the nonoptimized deflector design and a reference baseline design without a deflector plate.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Illingworth, J. , Hills, N. , and Barnes, C. J. , 2005, “ 3D Fluid-Solid Heat Transfer Coupling of an Aero-Engine Preswirl System,” ASME Paper No. GT2005-68939.
Amirante, D. , and Hills, N. , 2009, “ A Coupled Approach for Aerothermal Mechanical Modelling for Turbomachinery,” 1st International Conference on Computational Methods for Thermal Problems, ThermaCOMP09.
Dixon, J. A. , Valencia, G. A. , Bauknecht, A. , Coren, D. , and Atkins, N. , 2013, “ Heat Transfer in Turbine Hub Cavities Adjacent to the Main Gas Path,” ASME J. Turbomach., 135(2), p. 021025. [CrossRef]
Da Soghe, R. , Andreini, A. , and Facchini, B. , 2011, “ Turbine Stator Well CFD Studies: Effects of Coolant Supply Geometry on Cavity Sealing Performance,” ASME J. Turbomach., 133(2), p. 021008. [CrossRef]
Coren, D. D. , Atkins, N. R. , Long, C. A. , Eastwood, D. , Childs, P. R. N. , Valencia, G. A. , and Dixon, J. A. , 2011, “ The Influence of Turbine Stator Well Coolant Flow Rate and Passage Configuration on Cooling Effectiveness,” ASME Paper No. GT2011-46448.
Pohl, J. , Fico, V. , and Dixon, J. A. , 2015, “ Turbine Stator Well Cooling—Improved Geometry Benefits,” ASME Paper No. GT2015-42658.
Young, C. , Snowsill, G. D. , Ferra, P. W. , and Gravett, C. P. , 2012, “ Turbine Apparatus,” U.S. Patent No. US8186938.
Shahpar, S. , Polynkin, A. , and Toropov, V. , 2008, “ Large Scale Optimization of Transonic Axial Compressor Rotor Blades,” AIAA Paper No. 2008-2056.
Polynkin, A. , Toropov, V. , and Shahpar, S. , 2010, “ Multidisciplinary Optimization of Turbomachinery Based on Meta-Model Built by Genetic Programming,” AIAA Paper No. 2010-9397.
Schlaps, R. C. , Shahpar, S. , and Gümmer, V. , 2014, “ Automatic Three-Dimensional Optimisation of a Modern Tandem Compressor Vane,” ASME Paper No. GT2014-26762.
Verstraete, T. , Coletti, F. , Bulle, J. , Vanderwielen, T. , and Arts, T. , 2013, “ Optimization of a U-Bend for Minimal Pressure Loss in Internal Cooling Channels—Part I: Numerical Method,” ASME J. Turbomach., 135(5), p. 051015. [CrossRef]
Lück, H. , Schäfer, M. , and Schiffer, H.-P. , 2014, “ Thermal Fluid-Structure Interaction Based Optimization of Secondary Air Flows in Rotor Stator Cavities of Aircraft Turbines,” WCCM XI, ECCM V, ECFD VI.
Pohl, J. , Thompson, H. M. , Valencia, G. A. , Juste, L. G. , Fico, V. , and Clayton, G. A. , 2016, “ Structural Deflection's Impact in Turbine Stator Well Heat Transfer,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 139(4), p. 041901. [CrossRef]
Phadke, U. P. , and Owen, J. M. , 1988, “ Aerodynamic Aspects of the Sealing of Gas Turbine Rotor-Stator Systems—Part 1: The Behaviour of Simple Shrouded Rotating Disk Systems in Quiescent Environment,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 9(2), pp. 98–105. [CrossRef]
Phadke, U. P. , and Owen, J. M. , 1988, “ Aerodynamic Aspects of the Sealing of Gas Turbine Rotor-Stator Systems—Part 2: The Behaviour of Simple Seals in Quasi-Axisymmetric External Flow,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 9(2), pp. 106–112. [CrossRef]
Shahpar, S. , 2005, “ SOPHY: An Integrated CFD Based Automatic Design Optimisation System,” Report No. ISABE-2005-1086.
Shahpar, S. , 2002, “ SOFT: A New Design and Optimisation Tool for Turbomachinery,” Evolutionary Methods for Design, Optimisation and Control, CIMNE, Barcelona, Spain.
Shahpar, S. , and Lapworth, L. , 2003, “ PADRAM: Parametric Design and Rapid Meshing System for Turbomachinery Optimisation,” ASME Paper No. GT2003-38698.
Lapworth, L. , 2004, “ Hydra-CFD: A Framework for Collaborative CFD Development,” IC-SEC, Singapore, June 30–July 2.
McKay, M. D. , Conover, W. J. , and Beckman, R. J. , 1979, “ A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code,” Technometrics, 21(2), pp. 239–245.
Stein, M. , 1987, “ Large Sample Properties of Simulations Using Latin Hypercube Sampling,” Technometrics, 29(2), pp. 143–151. [CrossRef]
Baert, L. , Beauthier, C. , Leborgne, M. , and Lepot, I. , 2015, “ Surrogate-Based Optimisation for a Mixed-Variable Design Space: Proof of Concept and Opportunities for Turbomachinery Applications,” ASME Paper No. GT2015-43254.
Krige, D. G. , 1951, “ A Statistical Approach to Some Basic Mine Valuations and Allied Problems at the Witwatersrand,” Master's thesis, University of Witwatersrand, South Africa.
Matheron, G. , 1963, “ Principles of Geostatistics,” Econ. Geol., 58(8), pp. 1246–1266. [CrossRef]
Forrester, A. I. J. , Sobester, A. , and Keane, A. J. , 2008, Engineering Design Via Surrogate Modelling: A Practical Guide, Wiley, Chichester, UK.
Forrester, A. I. J. , Keane, A. J. , and Bressloff, N. W. , 2006, “ Design and Analysis of “Noisy” Computer Experiments,” AIAA J., 44(10), pp. 2331–2339. [CrossRef]
Brooks, C. J. , Forrester, A. I. J. , Keane, A. J. , and Shahpar, S. , 2011, “ Multi-Fidelity Design Optimisation of a Transonic Compressor Rotor,” 9th European Conference for Turbomachinery, Fluid Dynamics and Thermodynamics, Istanbul, Turkey, Mar. 21–25, Paper No. B230.
Dubrule, O. , 1983, “ Cross Validation of Kriging in Unique Neighbourhood,” Math. Geol., 15(6), pp. 687–699. [CrossRef]
Sasaki, D. , and Obayashi, S. , 2005, “ Efficient Search for Trade-Offs by Adaptive Range Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithms,” J. Aerosp. Comput. Inf. Commun., 2(1), pp. 44–64. [CrossRef]
Gill, P. E. , Murray, W. , and Wright, M. H. , 1981, Practical Optimization, Academic Press, London.
Powell, M. J. D. , 1983, “ Variable Metric Methods for Constrained Optimization,” Mathematical Programming: The State of the Art, A. Bachem , B. Korte , and M. Gr¨Atschel , eds., Springer, Berlin, pp. 288–311.
Guijarro Valencia, A. , Dixon, J. A. , Soghe, R. D. , Facchini, B. , Smith, P. E. J. , Munoz, J. , Eastwood, D. , Long, C. A. , Coren, D. , and Atkins, N. R. , 2012, “ An Investigation Into Numerical Analysis Alternatives for Predicting Re-Ingestion in Turbine Disc Rim Cavities,” ASME Paper No. GT2012-68592.
Eastwood, D. , Coren, D. D. , Long, C. A. , Atkins, N. R. , Childs, P. R. N. , Scanlon, T. J. , and Guijarro Valencia, A. , 2012, “ Experimental Investigation of Turbine Stator Well Rim Seal, Re-Ingestion and Interstage Seal Flows Using Gas Concentration Techniques and Displacement Measurements,” ASME J. Turbomach., 134(2), p. 082501.
Dixon, J. A. , Guijarro Valencia, A. , Coren, D., D. , and Long, C. , 2014, “ Main Annulus Gas Path Interactions—Turbine Stator Well Heat Transfer,” ASME J. Turbomach., 136(2), p. 021010. [CrossRef]
Eastwood, D. , 2014, “ Investigation of Rim Seal Exchange and Coolant Re-Ingestion in Rotor Stator Cavities Using Concentration Techniques,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Sussex, Sussex, UK.
Smith, P. E. J. , Mugglestone, J. , Tham, K. M. , Coren, D. D. , and Long, C. A. , 2012, “ Conjugate Heat Transfer CFD Analysis in Turbine Disc Cavities,” ASME Paper No. GT2012-69597.
Launder, B. E. , and Spalding, D. B. , 1974, “ The Numerical Computation of Flows,” J. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 3(2), pp. 269–289. [CrossRef]
Verdicchio, J. A. , 2001, “ The Validation and Coupling of Computational Fluid Dynamics and Finite Element Codes for Solving Industrial Problems,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Sussex, Sussex, UK.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Stator well flow structure with stationary deflector plate

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Geometrical parameter definition of the deflector plate: (a) shape definition and (b) position inside the cavity

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schematic representation of the optimization strategy using Kriging in SOFT

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Mesh of upstream TSW cavity with deflector plate merged to the main annulus

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Convergence history of the optimization

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

An objective function over constraint for evaluated designs

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

An overview of the Kriging prediction contoured by the adiabatic rotor disk temperature θdisc,ad

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Contours of swirl ratio for the optimized (left) and nonoptimized deflector plate (right) in a midplane cut

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Contours of fluid temperature for the optimized (left) and nonoptimized deflector plate (right) in a midplane cut

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Metal temperature contours for three different geometries

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Comparison of metal temperatures



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In