Research Papers: Internal Combustion Engines

Large Eddy Simulation of Cylindrical Jet Breakup and Correlation of Simulation Results With Experimental Data

[+] Author and Article Information
Shashank S. Moghe

MAHLE Engine Components USA Inc.,
23030 MAHLE Drive,
Farmington Hills, MI 48335
e-mail: shashank.moghe@us.mahle.com

Scott M. Janowiak

MAHLE Engine Components USA Inc.,
23030 MAHLE Drive,
Farmington Hills, MI 48335
e-mail: scott.janowiak@us.mahle.com

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the IC Engine Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received February 14, 2017; final manuscript received March 24, 2017; published online May 16, 2017. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 139(10), 102811 (May 16, 2017) (10 pages) Paper No: GTP-17-1056; doi: 10.1115/1.4036528 History: Received February 14, 2017; Revised March 24, 2017

Modern engines with increasing power densities have put additional demands on pistons to perform in incrementally challenging thermal environments. Piston cooling is therefore of paramount importance for engine component manufacturers. The objective of this computational fluid dynamics (CFD) study is to identify the effect of a given piston cooling nozzle (PCN) geometry on the cooling oil jet spreading phenomenon. The scope of this study is to develop a numerical setup using the open-source CFD toolkit OpenFoam® for measuring the magnitude of oil jet spreading and comparing it to experimental results. Large eddy simulation (LES) turbulence modeling is used to capture the flow physics that affects the inherently unsteady jet breakup phenomenon. The oil jet spreading width is the primary metric used for comparing the numerical and experimental results. The results of simulation are validated for the correct applicability of LES by evaluating the fraction of resolved turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) at various probe locations and also by performing turbulent kinetic energy spectral analysis. CFD results appear promising since they correspond to the experimental data within a tolerance (of ±10%) deemed satisfactory for the purpose of this study. Further generalization of the setup is underway toward developing a tool that predicts the aforementioned metric—thereby evaluating the effect of PCN geometry on oil jet spreading and hence on the oil catching efficiency (CE) of the piston cooling gallery. This tool would act as an intermediate step in boundary condition formulation for the simulation determining the filling ratio (FR) and subsequently the heat transfer coefficients (HTCs) in the piston cooling gallery.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Sroka, Z. J. , 2012, “ Some Aspects of Thermal Load and Operating Indexes After Downsizing for Internal Combustion Engine,” J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 110(1), pp. 51–58. [CrossRef]
Pope, S. B. , 2000, Turbulent Flows, 1st ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Gohil, T. B. , Saha, A. K. , and Muralidhar, K. , 2012, “ Numerical Study of Instability Mechanisms in a Circular Jet at Low Reynolds Numbers,” Comput. Fluids, 64, pp. 1–18. [CrossRef]
Liepmann, D. , and Gharib, M. , 1992, “ The Role of Streamwise Vorticity in the Near-Field Entrainment of Round Jets,” J. Fluid Mech., 245, pp. 643–668. [CrossRef]
Yule, A. J. , 1978, “ Large-Scale Structure in the Mixing Layer of a Round Jet,” J. Fluid Mech., 89(3), pp. 413–432. [CrossRef]
Brown, G. L. , and Roshko, A. , 1974, “ On Density Effects and Large Structure in Turbulent Mixing Layers,” J. Fluid Mech., 64(4), pp. 775–816. [CrossRef]
Winant, C. D. , and Browand, F. K. , 1974, “ Vortex Pairing: The Mechanism of Turbulent Mixing-Layer Growth at Moderate Reynolds Number,” J. Fluid Mech., 63(2), pp. 237–255. [CrossRef]
Pope, S. B. , 2004, “ Ten Questions Concerning the Large-Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Flows,” New J. Phys., 6(1), p. 35.
Smagorinsky, J. , 1963, “ General Circulation Experiments With the Primitive Equations—I: The Basic Experiment,” Mon. Weather Rev., 91(3), pp. 99–164. [CrossRef]
De Villiers, E. , 2007, “ The Potential of Large Eddy Simulation for the Modelling of Wall Bounded Flows,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of London, London, UK, pp. 65–66.
Issa, R. I. , 1986, “ Solution of the Implicitly Discretised Fluid Flow Equations by Operator-Splitting,” J. Comput. Phys., 62(1), pp. 40–65. [CrossRef]
Patankar, S. V. , and Brian Spalding, D. , 1972, “ A Calculation Procedure for Heat, Mass and Momentum Transfer in Three-Dimensional Parabolic Flows,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 15(10), pp. 1787–1806. [CrossRef]
Murakami, S. , and Mochida, A. , 1995, “ On Turbulent Vortex Shedding Flow Past 2D Square Cylinder Predicted by CFD,” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 54–55, pp. 191–211. [CrossRef]
Graham, P. , 2014, “ Experimental and Numerical Study of Multi-Phase Flow in a Coaxial Air Jet,” Ph.D. dissertation, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada, p. 105.
Addad, Y. , Benhamadouche, S. , and Laurence, D. , 2004, “ The Negatively Buoyant Wall-Jet: LES Results,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 25(5), pp. 795–808. [CrossRef]
Baggett, J. S. , Jiménez, J. , and Kravchenko, A. G. , 1997, “ Resolution Requirements in Large-Eddy Simulations of Shear Flows,” Annual Research Briefs, Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford, CA, pp. 51–66.
Gant, S. E. , 2010, “ Reliability Issues of LES-Related Approaches in an Industrial Context,” Flow Turbul. Combust., 84(2), p. 325. [CrossRef]
Kolmogorov, A. N. , 1991, “ The Local Structure of Turbulence in Incompressible Viscous Fluid for Very Large Reynolds Numbers,” Proc. Math. Phys. Sci., 434(1890), pp. 9–13. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Test bench for experimental determination of oil jet spreading

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Two-dimensional schematic for CFD simulation case setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Two-dimensional schematic for mesh refinement

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

One bar CFD and experimental oil jet spreading

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Three bar CFD and experimental oil jet spreading

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Five bar CFD and experimental oil jet spreading

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

LES quality metric (γ) at probe locations downstream of the oil jet breakup initiation point

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

TKE spectrum for the 1 bar case

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

TKE spectrum for the 3 bar case

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

TKE spectrum for the 5 bar case

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

(a) STL file representing the case geometry with piston cooling gallery inlet at TDC and (b) oil jet with piston cooling gallery inlet at TDC (piston shown only for representation)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

STL geometry with piston cooling gallery at (a) BDC, (b) 25% of the stroke, (c) 50% of the stroke, and (d) 75% of the stroke



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In