Expert View

Oral Assessments of Student Learning in Undergraduate Aerospace Propulsion and Power Courses

[+] Author and Article Information
Kurt P. Rouser

School of Mechanical and
Aerospace Engineering,
Oklahoma State University,
Stillwater, OK 74074
e-mail: kurt.rouser@okstate.edu

Contributed by the Education Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received June 27, 2017; final manuscript received June 28, 2017; published online September 13, 2017. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 139(12), 124701 (Sep 13, 2017) (7 pages) Paper No: GTP-17-1235; doi: 10.1115/1.4037577 History: Received June 27, 2017; Revised June 28, 2017

A purposeful approach has been taken to match teaching pedagogies (techniques), learning experiences, and assessment methods to various types of students learning in undergraduate aerospace propulsion courses at the junior-level at the United States Air Force Academy (USAFA) and senior-level at Oklahoma State University (OSU), Stillwater, OK. Prior studies in the scholarship of teaching and learning have shown the benefits of matching assessment methods, as well as teaching pedagogies and learning experiences, to the types of students learning associated with desired educational outcomes. Literature suggests the best method for teaching and assessing student’ cognitive learning is through explanation and presentation. Oral assessments have been implemented at the Air Force Academy and Oklahoma State University to evaluate students' cognitive learning in undergraduate aerospace propulsion and power courses. An oral midterm exam was performed to assess students' acquisition knowledge and understanding of fundamental concepts, the type of learning occurring early in course lesson sequences. End-of-semester design project poster sessions and presentations served as summative oral assessments of students' creative thinking, decision making, and professional judgment. Conversely, two written midterm exams and a final exam primarily focused on assessing students' problem solving skills and less on comprehensive knowledge. Oral assessments also served as reflective thinking experiences that reinforced student learning. Student feedback on oral assessment methods was collected through surveys conducted after each assessment. Survey results not only revealed the effectiveness of using oral assessments but also on how to improve their design and implementation, including the use of information technology (IT) and broader curricular employment.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Davis, B. , 1993, Tools for Teaching, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CA.
Jacobs, L. C. , and Chase, C. I. , 1992, Developing and Using Tests Effectively: A Guide for Faculty, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CA.
Bloom, B. S. , ed., 1956, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, Vol. 1: Cognitive Domain, McKay, New York.
Davis, J. , and Arend, B. , 2013, Facilitating Seven Ways of Learning, Stylus Publishing LLC, Sterling, VA.
Huxham, M. , Campbell, F. , and Westwood, J. , 2010, “ Oral versus Written Assessments: a Test of Student Performance and Attitudes,” Assess. Eval. Higher Educ., 37(1), pp. 125–136. [CrossRef]
Magin, D. , and Helmore, P. , 2010, “ Peer and Teacher Assessments of Oral Presentation Skills: How Reliable Are They?,” Stud. Higher Educ., 26(3), pp. 287–298. [CrossRef]
Boyer, K. M. , Rouser, K. P. , and Lawrence, T. J. , 2005, “ Development of an Aero-Thermodynamics Course to Aid an Undergraduate Propulsion Track,” ASME Paper No. GT2005-68383.
Rouser, K. P. , Boyer, K. M. , and Byerley, A. R. , 2006, “ A Contextual Framework for Enhancing an Undergraduate Thermo-Propulsion Sequence,” ASME Paper No. GT2006-90477.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

OSU MAE4243 end-of-semester course survey results



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In