Inertial motion sensors (IMSs) combine three sensors to produce a reportedly stable and accurate orientation estimate in three dimensions. Although accuracy has been reported within the range of 2 deg of error by manufacturers, the sensors are rarely tested in the challenging motion present in human motion. Their accuracy was tested in static, quasistatic, and dynamic situations against gold-standard Vicon camera data. It was found that static and quasistatic rms error was even less than manufacturers’ technical specifications. Quasistatic rms error was minimal at 0.3 deg ( SD) on the roll axis, 0.29 deg ( SD) on the pitch axis, and 0.73 deg ( SD) on the yaw axis. The dynamic rms error was between 1.9 deg and 3.5 deg on the main axes of motion but it increased considerably on off-axis during planar pendulum motion. Complex arm motion in the forward reaching plane proved to be a greater challenge for the sensors to track but results are arguably better than previously reported studies considering the large range of motion used.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
November 2009
Technical Briefs
Accuracy of Inertial Motion Sensors in Static, Quasistatic, and Complex Dynamic Motion
Alison Godwin,
Alison Godwin
School of Human Kinetics,
Laurentian University
, Sudbury, ON P3E 2C6, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Michael Agnew,
Michael Agnew
Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering,
Virginia Tech
, Blacksburg, VA 24061
Search for other works by this author on:
Joan Stevenson
Joan Stevenson
School of Kinesiology and Health Studies,
Queen’s University
, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Alison Godwin
School of Human Kinetics,
Laurentian University
, Sudbury, ON P3E 2C6, Canada
Michael Agnew
Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering,
Virginia Tech
, Blacksburg, VA 24061
Joan Stevenson
School of Kinesiology and Health Studies,
Queen’s University
, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, CanadaJ Biomech Eng. Nov 2009, 131(11): 114501 (5 pages)
Published Online: October 16, 2009
Article history
Received:
September 13, 2008
Revised:
June 24, 2009
Posted:
September 1, 2009
Published:
October 16, 2009
Citation
Godwin, A., Agnew, M., and Stevenson, J. (October 16, 2009). "Accuracy of Inertial Motion Sensors in Static, Quasistatic, and Complex Dynamic Motion." ASME. J Biomech Eng. November 2009; 131(11): 114501. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4000109
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
How Irregular Geometry and Flow Waveform Affect Pulsating Arterial Mass Transfer
J Biomech Eng (December 2024)
Phenomenological Muscle Constitutive Model With Actin–Titin Binding for Simulating Active Stretching
J Biomech Eng (January 2025)
Image-Based Estimation of Left Ventricular Myocardial Stiffness
J Biomech Eng (January 2025)
Related Articles
Ambulatory Device for Urinary Incontinence Detection in Female Athletes
J. Med. Devices (June,2009)
A Redundant Accelerometric Cluster for the Measurement of Translational and Angular Acceleration and Angular Velocity of the Head
J. Med. Devices (March,2007)
Effects of Camera Switching on Fine Accuracy in a Motion Capture System
J Biomech Eng (January,2009)
A Measurement Device for Rotational Stiffness of the Eye
J. Med. Devices (June,2008)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Introduction
Computer Vision for Structural Dynamics and Health Monitoring
4-Bit Pipeline ADC for Monolithic Active Pixel Sensors
International Conference on Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering (ICACTE 2009)
Case Study 10: Data Reconciliation
Engineering Optimization: Applications, Methods, and Analysis