The aim of this investigation was to achieve the first step toward a comprehensive model of the lymphatic system. A numerical model has been constructed of a lymphatic vessel, consisting of a short series chain of contractile segments (lymphangions) and of intersegmental valves. The changing diameter of a segment governs the difference between the flows through inlet and outlet valves and is itself governed by a balance between transmural pressure and passive and active wall properties. The compliance of segments is maximal at intermediate diameters and decreases when the segments are subject to greatly positive or negative transmural pressure. Fluid flow is the result of time-varying active contraction causing diameter to reduce and is limited by segmental viscous and valvular resistance. The valves effect a smooth transition from low forward-flow resistance to high backflow resistance. Contraction occurs sequentially in successive lymphangions in the forward-flow direction. The behavior of chains of one to five lymphangions was investigated by means of pump function curves, with variation of valve opening parameters, maximum contractility, lymphangion size gradation, number of lymphangions, and phase delay between adjacent lymphangion contractions. The model was reasonably robust numerically, with mean flow-rate generally reducing as adverse pressure was increased. Sequential contraction was found to be much more efficient than synchronized contraction. At the highest adverse pressures, pumping failed by one of two mechanisms, depending on parameter settings: either mean leakback flow exceeded forward pumping or contraction failed to open the lymphangion outlet valve. Maximum pressure and maximum flow-rate were both sensitive to the contractile state; maximum pressure was also determined by the number of lymphangions in series. Maximum flow-rate was highly sensitive to the transmural pressure experienced by the most upstream lymphangions, suggesting that many feeding lymphatics would be needed to supply one downstream lymphangion chain pumping at optimal transmural pressure.

1.
Browse
,
N. L.
,
Doig
,
R. L.
, and
Sizeland
,
D.
, 1984, “
The Resistance of a Lymph Node to Lymph Flow
,”
Br. J. Surg.
0007-1323,
71
, pp.
192
196
.
2.
Granger
,
H. J.
,
Laine
,
G. A.
,
Barnes
,
G. E.
, and
Lewis
,
R. E.
, 1984, “
Dynamics and Control of Transmicrovascular Fluid Exchange
,”
Edema
,
N. C.
Staub
and
A. E.
Taylor
, eds.,
Raven
,
New York
, pp.
189
225
.
3.
Reddy
,
N. P.
, 1974,
A Discrete Model of the Lymphatic System
,
Texas A&M University
,
College Station, TX
.
4.
Reddy
,
N. P.
,
Krouskop
,
T. A.
, and
Newell
,
P. H.
, Jr.
, 1977, “
A Computer Model of the Lymphatic System
,”
Comput. Biol. Med.
0010-4825,
7
(
3
), pp.
181
197
.
5.
Quick
,
C. M.
,
Venugopal
,
A. M.
,
Gashev
,
A. A.
,
Zawieja
,
D. C.
, and
Stewart
,
R. H.
, 2007, “
Intrinsic Pump-Conduit Behavior of Lymphangions
,”
Am. J. Physiol. Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol.
0363-6119,
292
(
4
), pp.
R1510
R1518
.
6.
Venugopal
,
A. M.
,
Stewart
,
R. H.
,
Laine
,
G. A.
,
Dongaonkar
,
R. M.
, and
Quick
,
C. M.
, 2007, “
Lymphangion Coordination Minimally Affects Mean Flow in Lymphatic Vessels
,”
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.
0363-6135,
293
(
2
), pp.
H1183
H1189
.
7.
Macdonald
,
A. J.
,
Arkill
,
K. P.
,
Tabor
,
G. R.
,
McHale
,
N. G.
, and
Winlove
,
C. P.
, 2008, “
Modeling Flow in Collecting Lymphatic Vessels: One-Dimensional Flow Through a Series of Contractile Elements
,”
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.
0363-6135,
295
, pp.
H305
H313
.
8.
Yao
,
W.
,
Wang
,
S. -Z.
, and
Ding
,
G. -H.
, 2009, “
A Linear Dynamic Model Describing Lymph Circulation
,”
J. Hydrodynam.
1001-6058,
21
(
1
), pp.
118
123
.
9.
Schmid-Schönbein
,
G. W.
, 1990, “
Microlymphatics and Lymph Flow
,”
Physiol. Rev.
0031-9333,
70
(
4
), pp.
987
1028
.
10.
Zhang
,
R. Z.
,
Gashev
,
A. A.
,
Zawieja
,
D. C.
, and
Davis
,
M. J.
, 2007, “
Length-Tension Relationships of Small Arteries, Veins, and Lymphatics From the Rat Mesenteric Microcirculation
,”
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.
0363-6135,
292
(
4
), pp.
H1943
H1952
.
11.
Flaherty
,
J. E.
,
Keller
,
J. B.
, and
Rubinov
,
S. I.
, 1972, “
Post-Buckling Behaviour of Elastic Tubes and Rings With Opposite Sides in Contact
,”
SIAM J. Appl. Math.
0036-1399,
23
, pp.
446
455
.
12.
McHale
,
N. G.
, and
Meharg
,
M. K.
, 1992, “
Co-Ordination Of Pumping in Isolated Bovine Lymphatic Vessels
,”
J. Physiol.
0022-3751,
450
, pp.
503
512
.
13.
Zawieja
,
D. C.
,
Davis
,
K. L.
,
Schuster
,
R.
,
Hinds
,
W. M.
, and
Granger
,
H. J.
, 1993, “
Distribution, Propagation, and Coordination of Contractile Activity in Lymphatics
,”
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.
0363-6135,
264
(
4
), pp.
H1283
H1291
.
14.
Levick
,
J. R.
, 2003, “
Circulation of Fluid Between Plasma, Interstitium and Lymph
,”
An Introduction to Cardiovascular Physiology
,
Hodder Arnold
,
London, UK
, pp.
170
198
.
15.
Crowe
,
M. J.
,
von der Weid
,
P. -Y.
,
Brock
,
J. A.
, and
Van Helden
,
D. F.
, 1997, “
Co-Ordination of Contractile Activity in Guinea-Pig Mesenteric Lymphatics
,”
J. Physiol.
0022-3751,
500
(
1
), pp.
235
244
.
16.
Davis
,
M. J.
,
Davis
,
A. M.
,
Lane
,
M. M.
,
Ku
,
C. W.
, and
Gashev
,
A. A.
, 2009, “
Rate-Sensitive Contractile Responses of Lymphatic Vessels to Circumferential Stretch
,”
J. Physiol.
0022-3751,
587
(
1
), pp.
165
182
.
17.
Davis
,
M. J.
,
Davis
,
A. M.
,
Ku
,
C. W.
, and
Gashev
,
A. A.
, 2009, “
Myogenic Constriction and Dilation of Isolated Lymphatic Vessels
,”
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.
0363-6135,
296
(
2
), pp.
H293
H302
.
18.
Gashev
,
A. A.
,
Davis
,
M. J.
, and
Zawieja
,
D. C.
, 2002, “
Inhibition of the Active Lymph Pump by Flow in Rat Mesenteric Lymphatics and Thoracic Duct
,”
J. Physiol.
0022-3751,
540
(Pt. 3), pp.
1023
1037
.
You do not currently have access to this content.