Product platforming is a technique for exploiting commonality across a family of products. While utilizing a common platform can have many advantages when developing and manufacturing products, the approach places greater demands on collaboration, in particular, the sharing and reuse of knowledge and information. Repositories are intended to facilitate information sharing across organizational groups and geographically distributed collaborators. A particular challenge in utilizing repositories is culling a search for the most appropriate information for the problem at hand. The Reuse Existing Unit for Shape and Efficiency (R.E.U.S.E.) method facilitates the search of information in a repository through three stages that consider similarity, efficiency, and configuration. Automated search and filter techniques are implemented with interaction with the user to effectively obtain the desired results. The similarity study uses thresholds to clarify different opportunities for reuse. The user can then select alternatives for further examination based on efficiency of satisfaction of desired characteristics. The degree of modification of the similar alternatives is reported to assist in the configuration of the new design. This method contributes to the field by (a) accounting for the variety of the product family during the reuse of existing process design information; (b) integrating an efficiency assessment for retrieval by considering characteristics beyond cost; and (c) addressing the search with a multicriteria method. The implementation of the R.E.U.S.E method is supported with an example of assembly line design for an air conditioner module in automobile production.

1.
Meyer
,
M. H.
, and
Lehnerd
,
A. P.
, 1997,
The Power of Product Platforms: Building Value and Cost Leadership
,
The Free Press
,
New York
.
2.
Simpson
,
T. W.
,
Siddique
,
Z.
, and
Jiao
,
J.
, 2005,
Product Platform and Product Family Design: Methods and Applications
,
Springer
,
New York
.
3.
Polanyi
,
M.
, 1966,
The Tacit Dimension
,
Routledge and Kegan Paul
,
London
.
4.
Bontis
,
N.
and
Choo
,
C. W.
, 2002,
The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge
,
Oxford University Press
,
New York
.
5.
Mcevily
,
S.
, and
Chakravarthy
,
B.
, 2002, “
The Persistence of Knowledge-Based Advantage: An Empirical Test for Product Performance and Technical Knowledge
,”
Strategic Manage. J.
0143-2095,
23
(
1
), pp.
285
305
.
6.
Barney
,
J. P.
, 1991, “
Special Theory Forum the Resources-Based Model of the Firm-Origins, Implications, and Prospects
,”
J. Manage.
0149-2063,
17
(
1
), pp.
99
120
.
7.
Collis
,
D.
, and
Montgomery
,
C. A.
, 1995, “
Competing on Resources: Strategy in the 1990
,”
Harvard Bus. Rev.
0017-8012,
73
, pp.
127
137
.
8.
Shooter
,
S. B.
,
Simpson
,
T. W.
,
Stone
,
R.
,
Terpenny
,
J.
, and
Kumara
,
S. R. T.
, 2004, “
Toward a Multi-agent Information Management Infrastructure for Product Family Planning and Mass Customization
,”
Int. J. Mass Customization
,
1
, pp.
134
155
.
9.
Feldmann
,
R.
, 1999, “
Developing a Tailored Reuse Repository Structure
,”
International Workshop on Learning Software Organizations
, Kaiserlautern, FRG.
10.
Catron
,
B. R.
, 1991, “
ALPS: A Language for Process Specification
,”
Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf.
0951-192X,
4
(
2
), pp.
105
113
.
11.
Genesereth
,
R. F.
, 1992, Knowledge Interface Fromat Version 3.0 Refrence Manual, Stanford, CA.
12.
Sivaloganathan
,
S.
, and
Shahin
,
T. M. M.
, 1999, “
Design Reuse: An Overview
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part B
0954-4054,
213
(
7
), pp.
641
654
.
13.
Simpson
,
T. W.
,
Maier
,
J. R. A.
, and
Mistree
,
F.
, 2001, “
Product Platform Design: Method and Application
,”
Res. Eng. Des.
0934-9839,
13
(
1
), pp.
2
22
.
14.
Sanderson
,
S. W.
, and
Uzumeri
,
M.
, 1997,
Managing Product Families
,
Irwin
,
Chicago, IL
.
15.
Wheelwright
,
S. C.
, and
Clark
,
K. B.
, 1995,
Leading Product Development
,
Free Press
,
New York
.
16.
Lehnerd
,
A. P.
, 1987, “
Revitalizing the Manufacture and Design of Mature Global Products
,”
Technology and Global Industry: Companies and Nations in the World Economy
,
B. R.
Guile
and
H.
Brooks
eds.,
National Academy Press
,
Washington, DC
, pp.
49
64
.
17.
Alizon
,
F.
,
Shooter
,
S. B.
, and
Simpson
,
T. W.
, 2006, “
Improving an Existing Product Family Based on Commonality/Diversity, Modularity, and Cost
,” to appear in
Proceedings of the ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences
, Philadelphia, PA, September, DETC2006/DFMLC-99536.
18.
McGrath
,
M. E.
, 1995,
Product Strategy for High-Technology Companies
,
Irwin Professional
,
New York
.
19.
Kimberly
,
W.
, 1999, “
Back to the future
,”
Automot. Eng.
0098-2571,
24
(
5
), pp.
62
64
.
20.
Williams
,
C. B.
,
Panchal
,
J. H.
, and
Rosen
,
D. W.
, 2003, “
A General Decision-Making Method for the Rapid Manufacturing of Customized Parts
,”
Design Engineering Technical Conferences
, Chicago, IL, ASME, Vol.
DETC2003/CIE-48198
.
21.
Jiao
,
J.
, 2000, “
Generic Bill-of-Material-and-Operations for High Variety Production Management
,”
Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl.
1063-293X,
8
(
4
), pp.
297
322
.
22.
Simpson
,
T. W.
, 2004, “
Product Platform Design and Customization: Status and Promise
,”
Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf.
0890-0604,
18
(
1
), pp.
3
20
.
23.
Kusiak
,
A.
, 1985, “
The Part Families Problem in Flexible Manufacturing Systems
,”
Ann. Operat. Res.
0254-5330,
25
(
1
), pp.
561
569
.
24.
Huang
,
M.-G.
,
Chang
,
P.-L.
, and
Chou
,
Y.-C.
, 2003, “
Fast Algorithm for Evaluating the Similarity of Manufacturing Processes within a Dynamic Production Environment
,”
Int. J. Prod. Res.
0020-7543,
41
(
17
), pp.
4171
4183
.
25.
Chang
,
T.-C.
, and
Wysk
,
R. A.
, 1985,
An Introduction to Automated Process Planning
,
Prentice-Hall
,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ
.
26.
Alting
,
L.
, and
Zhang
,
H.
, 1989, “
Computer Aided Process Planning: The State-of-the-Art Survey
,”
Int. J. Prod. Res.
0020-7543,
27
(
1
), pp.
553
585
.
27.
Halevi
,
G.
, and
Weill
,
R. D.
, 1995,
Principles of Process Planning
,
Chapman & Hall
,
New York
.
28.
Herrmann
,
J. W.
, and
Singh
,
G.
, 1997,
Design Similarity Measures for Process Planning and Design Evaluation
,
Institute for System Research
, University of Maryland.
29.
Mitrofanov
,
S. P.
, 1966,
The Scientific Priciples of Group Technology
,
National Lending Library Translation
.
30.
Burbidge
,
J. L.
, 1989,
Production Flow Analysis for Planing Group Technology
,
Clarendon Press
,
Oxford
.
31.
Offodile
,
O. F.
, 1991, “
Application of Similarity Coefficient Method to Parts Coding Classification Analysis in Group Technology
,”
J. Manuf. Syst.
0278-6125,
10
(
1
), pp.
442
448
.
32.
Ong
,
S. K.
, and
Guo
,
D. O.
, 2004, “
Online Design Reuse Tool for the Support of the Generation, Embodiment and Detailed Design of Products
,”
Int. J. Prod. Res.
0020-7543,
42
(
16
), pp.
3301
3331
.
33.
Cunningham
,
P.
, and
Smyth
,
B.
, 1997, “
Case-Based Reasoning in Scheduling: Reusing Solution Components
,”
Int. J. Prod. Res.
0020-7543,
35
(
11
), pp.
2947
2961
.
34.
Dimopoulos
,
C.
, and
Mort
,
N.
, 2004, “
Evolving Knowledge for the Solution of Clustering Problems in Cellular Manufacturing
,”
Int. J. Prod. Res.
0020-7543,
42
(
19
), pp.
4119
4133
.
35.
Alizon
,
F.
,
Dallery
,
Y.
, and
Celerier
,
J.
, 2002, “
Reuse of Existing Product-Process Configuration for Design of Manufacturing Facility
,”
12th International Flexible Automation and Intelligent Manufacturing Conference
, Dresden, Germany, July 15–17, Vol.
1
, pp.
134
141
.
36.
Trousse
,
B.
, 1993, “
Towards a Multi-agent Approach for Building Intelligent CAD Systems
,” in
Advanced Technologies-Architecture, Planning, Civil Engineering
,
M. R.
Beheshti
and
K.
Zreik
, eds.,
Elsevier Sciences Publishers
,
Deft
, The Netherlands, pp.
451
460
.
37.
Roy
,
B.
, 1991, “
The Outranking Approach and the Foundations of ELECTRE Methods
,”
Theory and Decision
,
31
, pp.
49
73
.
You do not currently have access to this content.