This paper describes a method for vehicle yaw rate estimation using two accelerometers and a steer angle sensor. This yaw rate estimate can be used as an inexpensive alternative to commercial yaw rate sensors in vehicle control applications. The proposed method combines two complementary approaches to yaw rate estimation using accelerometers. This new method is superior to either method used by itself. This paper presents the new approach, supporting analyses, simulation results and experimental validation. The simulation results are based upon both linear and nonlinear vehicle dynamics models and include important effects such as sensor drift and noise, disturbances acting on the vehicle, and model uncertainties. The experimental validation is based on test data from a specially instrumented vehicle driven on a test track. These results indicate that the proposed yaw rate estimation scheme performs well for a wide range of operating conditions and is not difficult to implement.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Topics:
Vehicles, Yaw, Sensors, Accelerometers, Simulation results, Noise (Sound), Uncertainty, Vehicle dynamics
1.
A˚stro¨m, K. J., and B. Wittenmark, 1990, Computer Controlled Systems, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
2.
Bakker, E., H. B. Pacejka, and L. Lidner, 1989, “A New Tire Model with an Application in Vehicle Dynamics Studies,” 4th Auto Technologies Conference, Monte Carlo, SAE 890087.
3.
Doeblin, E. O., 1990, Measurement Systems, McGraw-Hill, New York.
4.
Hitachi, US Patent No. 5,247,466 dated September 21, 1993.
5.
Jurgen, R., 1994, Automotive Electronics Handbook, McGraw-Hill, New York.
6.
Lin, C. F., and A. G. Ulsoy, 1995, “Disturbance Estimation for Vehicle Path Projection,” Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Seattle, Washington, June.
1.
Pilutti, T., A. G. Ulsoy, and D. Hrovat, 1998, “Vehicle Steering Intervention Through Differential Braking,” ASME JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL (in press).
2.
(Also published in the Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Seattle, Washington, June 1995.)
1.
Porter
 
B.
, and
Power
 
H. M.
,
1970
, “
Controllability of Multivariable Systems Incorporating Integral Feedback
,”
Electronics Letters
, Vol.
6
, pp.
689
–
690
.
2.
Sivashankar, N., and A. G. Ulsoy, 1995, “Vehicle Yaw Rate Estimation,” Ford Internal Report, Dec.
3.
Soltis, M. W., 1993, Ford Internal Report, May.
4.
Soltis, M. W., R. M. Stuntz and A. Zaremba, 1994, Ford Internal Report, June.
5.
Ulsoy, A. G., 1992, “Lecture Notes for ME 568: Vehicle Control Systems,” IVHS Program Technical Report, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
6.
Venhovens, P. J. Th., 1993, “Optimal Control of Vehicle Suspensions,” PhD dissertation. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Marine Technology, Delft University, Netherlands.
7.
Venhovens, P. J. Th., 1995, CAPC Simulator Documentation, UMTRI, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
8.
Wong, J. Y., 1993, Theory of Ground Vehicles, Wiley, New York.
9.
Zaremba, A., and R. M. Stuntz, 1994, Cost Effective Yaw Rate Sensing, Technical Memorandum No. SRM-94-16, Ford Research Laboratory, July 1994, Dearborn, MI.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 1998
 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.