A mathematical model for the large deflection dynamics of a compliant beam device is presented. The device simulates the motion of a slider-crank device. The system contains a highly flexible beam that provides the compliant motion from a sliding mass at one end to a rotating hinge point at the other end. Basic models for friction and beam dissipation effects are included. A nonlinear integro-partial differential equation is derived for the complete beam/mass system in the curved space of the deformed beam. The resulting equation is cast into a generalized nondimensional form suitable for studying system behavior for a broad range of system sizes. The dynamic equation is solved in curved space by applying a spatial solution that closely represents the large static deflection measured for the beam. The nonlinear system dynamics are simulated for an initial large deflection of the system and compared to experimental results for an actual physical system.

1.
Ananthasuresh, G. K., and Kota, S., 1995, “Designing Compliant Mechanisms,” Mech. Eng. (Am. Soc. Mech. Eng.), Nov., pp. 93–96.
2.
Bisshopp
,
K. E.
, and
Drucker
,
D. c.
,
1945
, “
Large Deflection of Cantilever Beams
,”
Q. Appl. Math.
,
3
, No.
3
, pp.
272
275
.
3.
Shoup
,
T. E.
,
1972
, “
On the Use of the Nodal Elastica for the Analysis of Flexible Link Devices
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind
, , Aug., pp.
871
875
.
4.
Howell
,
L. L.
, and
Midha
,
A.
,
1995
, “
Parametric Deflection Approximations for End-Loaded Large-Deflection Beams in Compliant Mechanisms
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
117
, pp.
156
165
.
5.
Howell
,
L. L.
,
Midha
,
A.
, and
Norton
,
T. W.
,
1996
, “
Evaluation of Equivalent Spring Stiffness for Use in a Pseudo-Rigid-Body Model of Large-Deflection Compliant Mechanisms
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
118
, pp.
126
131
.
6.
Jensen, B. D., Howell, L. L., Gunyan, D. B., and Salmon, L. G., 1997 “The Design and Analysis of Compliant MEMS Using the Pseudo-Rigid-Body Model,” Proceedings, Microelectromechanical Systems, ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Dallas, DSC-Vol. 62, pp. 119–126.
7.
Lyon, S. M., Evans, M. S., Erickson, P. A., and Howell, L. L., 1997, “Dynamic Response of Compliant Mechanisms Using the Pseudo-Rigid-Body Model,” Proceedings, ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Sacramento, Sept.
8.
Saxena
,
A.
, and
Kramer
,
S. N.
,
1998
, “
A simple and Accurate Method for Determining Large Deflections in Compliant Mechanisms Subjected to End forces and Moments
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
120
, pp.
392
400
.
9.
Crespo da Silva
,
M. R. M.
, and
Glynn
,
C. C.
,
1978
, “
Nonlinear Flexural-Flexural-Torsional Dynamics of Inextensional Beams, I. Equations of Motion, and II. Forced Motion
,”
Journal of Structural Mechanics
,
6
, No.
4
, pp.
437
461
.
10.
Nayfeh
,
A. H.
,
Chin
,
C.
, and
Nayfeh
,
S. A.
,
1995
, “
Nonlinear Normal Modes of a Cantilever Beam
,”
ASME J. Vibr. Acoust.
,
117
, pp.
477
481
.
11.
Atanackovic
,
T. M.
, and
Cveticanin
,
L. J.
,
1996
, “
Dynamics of Plane Motion of an Elastic Rod
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
,
63
, pp.
392
398
.
12.
Moon, F. C., 1987, Chaotic Vibrations, An Introduction for Applied Scientists and Engineers, Wiley, NY, pp. 96–97.
13.
Popov, E. P., Mechanics of Materials, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1976, p. 359.
14.
Panza
,
M. J.
, and
Mayne
,
R. W.
,
1996
, “
Hydraulic Actuator Tuning in the Control of A Rotating Beam Mechanism
,”
ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control
,
118
, pp.
449
456
.
You do not currently have access to this content.