Input shaping is a control method that limits motion-induced oscillation in vibratory systems by intelligently shaping the reference command. As with any control method, the robustness of input shaping to parameter variations and modeling errors is an important consideration. For input shaping, there exists a fundamental compromise between robustness to such errors and system rise time. For all types of shapers, greater robustness requires a longer duration shaper, which degrades rise time. However, if a shaper is allowed to contain negative impulses, then the shaper duration may be shortened with only a small cost of robustness and possible high-mode excitation. This paper presents a thorough analysis of the compromise between shaper duration, robustness, and possible high-mode excitation for several negative input-shaping methods. In addition, a formulation for specified negative amplitude, specified insensitivity shapers is presented. These shapers provide a continuous spectrum of solutions for the duration/robustness/high-mode excitation trade-off. Experimental results from a portable bridge crane verify the theoretical predictions.

1.
Smith
,
O.
, 1958,
Feedback Control Systems
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
.
2.
Singer
,
N. C.
, and
Seering
,
W. P.
, 1990, “
Preshaping Command Inputs to Reduce System Vibration
,”
ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control
0022-0434,
112
, pp.
76
82
.
3.
Murphy
,
B. R.
, and
Watanabe
,
I.
, 1992, “
Digital Shaping Filters for Reducing Machine Vibration
,”
IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom.
1042-296X,
8
(
2
), pp.
285
289
.
4.
Singhose
,
W.
,
Seering
,
W.
, and
Singer
,
N.
, 1994, “
Residual Vibration Reduction Using Vector Diagrams to Generate Shaped Inputs
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
0161-8458,
116
, pp.
654
659
.
5.
Singh
,
T.
, and
Vadali
,
S. R.
, 1995, “
Robust Time-Delay Control of Multimode Systems
,”
Int. J. Control
0020-7179,
62
(
6
), pp.
1319
1339
.
6.
Singhose
,
W.
,
Seering
,
W.
, and
Singer
,
N.
, 1996, “
Input Shaping for Vibration Reduction With Specified Insensitivity to Modeling Errors
,”
Japan-USA Symposium on Flexible Automation
, Boston, MA, Vol.
1
, pp.
307
313
.
7.
Park
,
U. H.
,
Lee
,
J. W.
,
Lim
,
B. D.
, and
Sung
,
Y. G.
, 2001, “
Design and Sensitivity Analysis of an Input Shaping Filter in the z-Plane
,”
J. Sound Vib.
0022-460X,
243
(
1
), pp.
157
171
.
8.
Vaughan
,
J.
,
Yano
,
A.
, and
Singhose
,
W.
, 2008, “
Comparison of Robust Input Shapers
,”
J. Sound Vib.
,
315
(
4–5
), pp.
797
815
. 0022-460X
9.
Kozak
,
K.
,
Singhose
,
W.
, and
Ebert-Uphoff
,
I.
, 2006, “
Performance Measures for Input Shaping and Command Generation
,”
ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control
0022-0434,
128
(
3
), pp.
731
736
.
10.
Singhose
,
W.
,
Singer
,
N.
, and
Seering
,
W.
, 1997, “
Time-Optimal Negative Input Shapers
,”
ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control
0022-0434,
119
, pp.
198
205
.
11.
Singhose
,
W.
,
Biediger
,
E.
,
Chen
,
Y. -H.
, and
Mills
,
B.
, 2004, “
Reference Command Shaping Using Specified-Negative-Amplitude Input Shapers for Vibration Reduction
,”
ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control
0022-0434,
126
, pp.
210
214
.
12.
Gurleyuk
,
S. S.
, 2006, “
Optimal Unity-Magnitude Input Shaper Duration Analysis
,”
Arch. Appl. Mech.
,
77
(
1
), pp.
63
71
. 0939-1533
13.
Singhose
,
W.
,
Porter
,
L.
,
Tuttle
,
T.
, and
Singer
,
N.
, 1997, “
Vibration Reduction Using Multi-Hump Input Shapers
,”
ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control
0022-0434,
119
, pp.
320
326
.
14.
Singhose
,
W.
,
Kim
,
D.
, and
Kenison
,
M.
, 2008, “
Input Shaping Control of Double-Pendulum Bridge Crane Oscillations
,”
ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control
0022-0434,
130
(
3
), p.
034504
.
You do not currently have access to this content.