Accurate prediction of slug length distribution and the maximum slug length in a hilly terrain pipeline is crucial for designing downstream separation facilities. A hilly terrain pipeline consists of interconnected uphill and downhill pipe sections, where slugs can dissipate in the downhill sections and grow in the uphill sections. Furthermore, new slugs can be generated at the dips (bottom elbows) and dissipate at the top elbows. Although existing steady-state models are capable of predicting the average slug length for pressure drop calculations and pipeline design, they are incapable of predicting detailed flow characteristics such as the maximum slug length expected at the exit of a hilly terrain pipeline. A transient slug tracking model based on a quasi-equilibrium formulation was developed to track the front and back of each individual slug, from which individual slug lengths are calculated. The model was verified with large-scale two-phase flow hilly terrain experimental data acquired at the Tulsa University Fluid Flow Projects (TUFFP). The results show a fairly accurate match between the model predictions and experimental data.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
March 2004
Technical Papers
Prediction of Slug Length Distribution Along a Hilly Terrain Pipeline Using Slug Tracking Model
James P. Brill
James P. Brill
Search for other works by this author on:
Eissa M. Al-safran
Yehuda Taitel
James P. Brill
Contributed by the Petroleum Division and presented at the ETCE 2002, Houston, Texas, February 6–8 2002 of THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS. Manuscript received by the Petroleum Division July 2002; revised manuscript received August 2003. Associate Editor: H. Yeung.
J. Energy Resour. Technol. Mar 2004, 126(1): 54-62 (9 pages)
Published Online: May 4, 2004
Article history
Received:
July 1, 2002
Revised:
August 1, 2003
Online:
May 4, 2004
Citation
Al-safran, E. M., Taitel, Y., and Brill, J. P. (May 4, 2004). "Prediction of Slug Length Distribution Along a Hilly Terrain Pipeline Using Slug Tracking Model ." ASME. J. Energy Resour. Technol. March 2004; 126(1): 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1649971
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Related Articles
Evaluation of “Marching Algorithms” in the Analysis of Multiphase Flow in Natural Gas Pipelines
J. Energy Resour. Technol (December,2008)
Fluids Transport Optimization Using Seabed Separation
J. Energy Resour. Technol (September,2000)
A New Method for Prediction of the Transient Force Generated by a
Liquid Slug Impact on an Elbow of an Initially Voided Line
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (January,0001)
Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Separator Pressure Fluctuation Effect on Terrain Slugging in a Hilly Terrain Two-Phase Flow Pipeline
J. Energy Resour. Technol (September,2008)
Related Chapters
DEVELOPMENTS IN STRAIN-BASED FRACTURE ASSESSMENTS - A PERSPECTIVE
Pipeline Integrity Management Under Geohazard Conditions (PIMG)
Re-Qualification of Existing Subsea Pipelines for CO 2 and H 2 Transport, Structural Integrity Challenges
Ageing and Life Extension of Offshore Facilities
A Theoretical Model for Crack Propagation and Crack Arrest in Pressurized Pipelines
Crack Arrest Methodology and Applications