Industrially, many solid wastes can be classified as biomass and their usage reduces disposal costs. In this work, seven wastes from textile and food industries were characterized chemically and physically and the gaseous emissions resulting from the combustion of three of them (textile residues 3, TR3; coffee grounds; and a mixture of meat processing industry wastewater sludge and saw dust (1:9) in weight, SS1) in a pilot scale cyclone type combustor were measured. Their potential for utilization as energy sources was assessed by comparing the emissions to current legislation. Chemical properties showed that the volatile matter values of all biomass were high, which indicate that the solids burn rapidly. Some biomass presented high levels of sulfur and consequently high levels of SO2 emission when burned. The lower heating values ranged from 6.44MJkg1 (dry and ash free, daf) to 22.93MJkg1 (daf) and thermogravimetric analysis of the biomasses showed ignition temperatures and maximum burning rates, which were compared with other papers’ data. Four combustion tests were carried out in a cyclone type combustor and CO, CO2, NOx, CxHy, and SO2 were measured. Moisture content and particulate matter were also measured during the combustion tests and showed effective combustion conditions. Volatile organic compounds were analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and their content values were expressed as total organic carbon (TOC), being all TOC emissions below the limits imposed by the regulations taken as reference. Gaseous emissions were compared with limits imposed by Brazilian and international current legislations, what showed that the usage of these biomasses as energy sources is possible; however, gas treatment would be required, especially if the solid presents high levels of sulfur and chlorine.

1.
Yin
,
C.
,
Rosendahl
,
L. A.
, and
Kær
,
S. K.
, 2008, “
Grate-Firing of Biomass for Heat and Power Production
,”
Prog. Energy Combust. Sci.
0360-1285,
34
, pp.
725
754
.
2.
Otero
,
M.
,
Díez
,
C.
,
Calvo
,
L. F.
,
García
,
A. I.
, and
Morán
,
A.
, 2002, “
Analysis of the Co-Combustion of Swage Sludge and Coal by TG-MS
,”
Biomass Bioenergy
0961-9534,
22
(
4
), pp.
319
329
.
3.
de Sena
,
R. F.
,
Claudino
,
A.
,
Moretti
,
K.
,
Bonfanti
,
Í. C. P.
,
Moreira
,
R. F. P. M.
, and
José
,
H. J.
, 2008, “
Biofuel Application of Biomass Obtained From a Meat Industry Wastewater Plant Through the Flotation Process—A Case Study
,”
Resour. Conserv. Recycl.
0921-3449,
52
(
3
), pp.
557
569
.
5.
Skodras
,
G.
,
Palladas
,
A.
,
Kaldis
,
S. P.
, and
Sakellaropoulos
,
G. P.
, 2007, “
Cleaner Co-Combustion of Lignite-Biomass-Waste Blends by Utilising Inhibiting Compounds of Toxic Emissions
,”
Chemosphere
0045-6535,
67
, pp.
S191
S197
.
6.
1983, “
Brazilian Standard Test Method for Vegetal Carbon Proximate Analysis, ABNT NBR 8112
,” Brasília, in Portuguese.
7.
1989, “
Standard Practice for Ultimate Analysis of Coal and Coke; ASTM 3176-89
,” approved on Sept. 29, reapproved in 1997.
8.
2004, “
Standard Test Method for Gross Calorific Value of Coal and Coke; ASTM D5865-04
,” approved on Apr. 1.
9.
2000, “
Determining the Gross Calorific Value of Solid and Liquid Fuels Using the Bomb Calorimeter, and Calculation of Net Calorific Value—Part 1: General Information; DIN 51900-1
.”
10.
2005, “
Testing of Solid and Liquid Fuels—Determination of Gross Calorific Value by the Bomb Calorimeter and Calculation of Net Calorific Value—Part 3: Method Using Adiabatic Jacket; DIN 51900-3
.”
11.
1996, “
Analysis of Coal Ash and Coke Ash by X-Ray Fluorescence (XFA); DIN 51729-10
.”
12.
Pronobis
,
M.
, 2005, “
Evaluation of the Influence of Biomass Co-Combustion on Boiler Furnace Slagging by Means of Fusibility Correlations
,”
Biomass Bioenergy
0961-9534,
28
, pp.
375
383
.
13.
Fryda
,
L.
,
Panopoulos
,
K.
,
Vourliotis
,
P.
,
Pavlidou
,
E.
, and
Kakaras
,
E.
, 2006, “
Experimental Investigation of Fluidised Bed Co-Combustion of Meat and Bone Meal With Coals and Olive Bagasse
,”
Fuel
0016-2361,
85
(
12-13
), pp.
1685
1699
.
14.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
, 2006, “
Method 4—Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases
,” online http://www.arb.ca.gov/testmeth/vol1/Meth04_clean.pdfhttp://www.arb.ca.gov/testmeth/vol1/Meth04_clean.pdf
15.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
, 2006, “
Method 5—Determination of Particulate Matter Emissions From Stationary Sources
,” online http://www.arb.ca.gov/testmeth/vol1/m_5.pdfhttp://www.arb.ca.gov/testmeth/vol1/m_5.pdf
16.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
, 2006, “
Compendium Method TO-17—Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air Using Active Sampling Onto Sorbent Tube
,” online http://www.epa.gov/ttnamti1/files/ambient/airtox/to-17r.pdfhttp://www.epa.gov/ttnamti1/files/ambient/airtox/to-17r.pdf
17.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
, 2005, “
Technical Guidance Note M16—The Measurement and Monitoring of Volatile Organic Compounds to Air From Industrial Installations, Version 1
,” Jul.
18.
National Council of the Environment (CONAMA)
, 2002, “
Resolution 316
,” Ministry of the Environment, Brasília, DF, Brazil, in Portuguese.
19.
German Legislation
, 2003,
17th Ordinance on the Implementation of the Federal Emission Control Act—Ordinance for Combustion and Co-Combustion of Wastes of August 14th
,
Bundesanzeiger
,
Bonn, Germany
, in German.
20.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
, 2006, “
Code of Federal Regulation, Title 40, Part 60
,” online http://www.epa.gov/epacfr40/chapt-I.infohttp://www.epa.gov/epacfr40/chapt-I.info
21.
Bryant
,
G. W.
,
Browning
,
G. J.
,
Emanuel
,
H.
,
Gupta
,
R. P.
,
Lucas
,
J. A.
, and
Wall
,
T. F.
, 2000, “
The Fusibility of Blended Coal Ash
,”
Energy Fuels
0887-0624,
14
, pp.
316
325
.
22.
Demirbas
,
A.
, 2004, “
Combustion Characteristics of Different Biomass Fuels
,”
Prog. Energy Combust. Sci.
0360-1285,
30
(
2
), pp.
219
230
.
23.
Obernberger
,
I.
, 2006, “
Physical Characteristics and Chemical Composition of Solid Biomass Fuels. In: Obernberger, I., Brunner, T., Bärnthaler, G., Chemical Properties of Solid Biofuels—Significance and Impact
,”
Biomass Bioenergy
0961-9534,
30
, pp.
973
982
.
You do not currently have access to this content.