This paper deals with an integrated biomass system developed for syngas production with waste heat recovery option and analyzes this system thermodynamically using both energy and exergy approaches. Also, an aspenplus simulation model is developed to demonstrate comparative gasification analyses of wood (Birch) and olive waste using Gibbs reactor for syngas production. Gibbs free energy minimization technique is applied to calculate the equilibrium of chemical reactions. In this newly developed model, the heat of the product syngas and the waste heat from the flue gas are recovered through a unique integration of four heat exchangers to produce steam for the gasification process. The sensitivity analyses are performed to observe the variations in the concentration of the methane, carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide in syngas against various operating conditions. Furthermore, the performance of gasifier is indicated through cold gas energy efficiency (CGE) and cold gas exergy efficiency (CGEX). The overall energy and exergy analyses are also conducted, and the comparisons reveal that the biomass composed of olive waste yields high magnitude of overall and cold gas energy efficiencies, whereas wood (Birch) yields high magnitude of overall and cold gas exergy efficiencies. Moreover, the energy of the product syngas is recovered through an expander which enhances energy and exergy efficiencies of the overall system. The present results show that the CGE, CGEX, and overall energetic and exergetic efficiencies follow a decreasing trend with the increase in combustion temperature. The proposed system has superior and unique features as compared to conventional biomass gasification systems.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
September 2018
Research-Article
A Comparative Study of Syngas Production From Two Types of Biomass Feedstocks With Waste Heat Recovery
Shahid Islam,
Shahid Islam
Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science,
University of Ontario Institute of Technology,
2000 Simcoe Street North,
Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada;
University of Ontario Institute of Technology,
2000 Simcoe Street North,
Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada;
Mechanical Engineering Department,
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals,
Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
e-mail: shahid.islam@uoit.ca
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals,
Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
e-mail: shahid.islam@uoit.ca
Search for other works by this author on:
Ibrahim Dincer
Ibrahim Dincer
Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science,
University of Ontario Institute of Technology,
2000 Simcoe Street North,
Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada;
University of Ontario Institute of Technology,
2000 Simcoe Street North,
Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada;
Mechanical Engineering Faculty,
Yildiz Technical University,
Besiktas, Istanbul, Turkey
Yildiz Technical University,
Besiktas, Istanbul, Turkey
Search for other works by this author on:
Shahid Islam
Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science,
University of Ontario Institute of Technology,
2000 Simcoe Street North,
Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada;
University of Ontario Institute of Technology,
2000 Simcoe Street North,
Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada;
Mechanical Engineering Department,
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals,
Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
e-mail: shahid.islam@uoit.ca
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals,
Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
e-mail: shahid.islam@uoit.ca
Ibrahim Dincer
Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science,
University of Ontario Institute of Technology,
2000 Simcoe Street North,
Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada;
University of Ontario Institute of Technology,
2000 Simcoe Street North,
Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada;
Mechanical Engineering Faculty,
Yildiz Technical University,
Besiktas, Istanbul, Turkey
Yildiz Technical University,
Besiktas, Istanbul, Turkey
1Corresponding author.
Contributed by the Advanced Energy Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received October 27, 2017; final manuscript received March 25, 2018; published online April 19, 2018. Editor: Hameed Metghalchi.
J. Energy Resour. Technol. Sep 2018, 140(9): 092002 (11 pages)
Published Online: April 19, 2018
Article history
Received:
October 27, 2017
Revised:
March 25, 2018
Citation
Islam, S., and Dincer, I. (April 19, 2018). "A Comparative Study of Syngas Production From Two Types of Biomass Feedstocks With Waste Heat Recovery." ASME. J. Energy Resour. Technol. September 2018; 140(9): 092002. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4039873
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Related Articles
Advanced Concepts in Modular Coal and Biomass Gasifiers
J. Energy Resour. Technol (January,2019)
Comparative Study of Two Low C O 2 Emission Power Generation System Options With Natural Gas Reforming
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (September,2008)
Integration of an Electrolysis Unit for Producer Gas Conditioning in a Bio-Synthetic Natural Gas Plant
J. Energy Resour. Technol (January,2019)
Syngas Characteristics From Catalytic Gasification of Polystyrene and Pinewood in CO 2 Atmosphere
J. Energy Resour. Technol (May,2021)
Related Chapters
Part B: Torrefaction of Lignocellulosic Agricultural Waste into Biocoal
Biomass and Waste Energy Applications
Introduction
Nanomaterials in Glucose Sensing: Biomedical & Nanomedical Technologies - Concise Monographs
ASME Section VI: Recommended Rules for the Care and Operation of Heating Boilers
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Codes, Volume 1 Sixth Edition