The gas–liquid cylindrical cyclone (GLCC) is a widely used alternative for gas–liquid conventional separation. Besides its maturity, the effect of some geometrical parameters over its performance is not fully understood. The main objective of this study is to use computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling in order to evaluate the effect of geometrical modifications in the reduction of liquid carry over (LCO) and gas carry under (GCU). Simulations for two-phase flow were carried out under zero net liquid flow, and the average liquid holdup was compared with Kanshio (Kanshio, S., 2015, “Multiphase Flow in Pipe Cyclonic Separator,” Ph.D. thesis, Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK) obtaining root-mean-square errors around 13% between CFD and experimental data. An experimental setup, in which LCO data were acquired, was built in order to validate a CFD model that includes both phases entering to the GLCC. An average discrepancy below 6% was obtained by comparing simulations with experimental data. Once the model was validated, five geometrical variables were tested with CFD. The considered variables correspond to the inlet configuration (location and inclination angle), the effect of dual inlet, and nozzle geometry (diameter and area reduction). Based on the results, the best configuration corresponds to an angle of 27 deg, inlet location 10 cm above the center, a dual inlet with 20 cm of spacing between both legs, a nozzle of 3.5 cm of diameter, and a volute inlet of 15% of pipe area. The combination of these options in the same geometry reduced LCO by 98% with respect to the original case of the experimental setup. Finally, the swirling decay was studied with CFD showing that liquid has a greater impact than the gas flowrate.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
September 2018
Research-Article
Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling of Gas–Liquid Cylindrical Cyclones, Geometrical Analysis
Juan Carlos Berrio,
Juan Carlos Berrio
Chemical Engineering Department,
Universidad de los Andes,
Bogota 111711, Colombia
Universidad de los Andes,
Bogota 111711, Colombia
Search for other works by this author on:
Eduardo Pereyra,
Eduardo Pereyra
McDougall School of Petroleum Engineering,
The University of Tulsa,
Tulsa, OK 74104
The University of Tulsa,
Tulsa, OK 74104
Search for other works by this author on:
Nicolas Ratkovich
Nicolas Ratkovich
Chemical Engineering Department,
Universidad de los Andes,
Bogota 111711, Colombia
Universidad de los Andes,
Bogota 111711, Colombia
Search for other works by this author on:
Juan Carlos Berrio
Chemical Engineering Department,
Universidad de los Andes,
Bogota 111711, Colombia
Universidad de los Andes,
Bogota 111711, Colombia
Eduardo Pereyra
McDougall School of Petroleum Engineering,
The University of Tulsa,
Tulsa, OK 74104
The University of Tulsa,
Tulsa, OK 74104
Nicolas Ratkovich
Chemical Engineering Department,
Universidad de los Andes,
Bogota 111711, Colombia
Universidad de los Andes,
Bogota 111711, Colombia
Contributed by the Advanced Energy Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received August 7, 2017; final manuscript received March 10, 2018; published online April 26, 2018. Assoc. Editor: Reza Sheikhi.
J. Energy Resour. Technol. Sep 2018, 140(9): 092003 (14 pages)
Published Online: April 26, 2018
Article history
Received:
August 7, 2017
Revised:
March 10, 2018
Citation
Carlos Berrio, J., Pereyra, E., and Ratkovich, N. (April 26, 2018). "Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling of Gas–Liquid Cylindrical Cyclones, Geometrical Analysis." ASME. J. Energy Resour. Technol. September 2018; 140(9): 092003. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4039609
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Related Articles
Experimental Study of Low Concentration Sand Transport in Multiphase Air–Water Horizontal Pipelines
J. Energy Resour. Technol (May,2015)
Application of Artificial Neural Network-Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm for Prediction of Asphaltene Precipitation During Gas Injection Process and Comparison With Gaussian Process Algorithm
J. Energy Resour. Technol (November,2015)
Nanopore Confinement and Pore Connectivity Considerations in Modeling Unconventional Resources
J. Energy Resour. Technol (January,2019)
Correcting Inflow Performance Relationship Curves for Explicitly Coupling Reservoir Simulations and Production Systems Simulations
J. Energy Resour. Technol (March,2018)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Multiphase Flow Simulations of Sediment Particles in Mixed-flow Pumps
Mixed-flow Pumps: Modeling, Simulation, and Measurements
Siphon Seals and Water Legs
Hydraulics, Pipe Flow, Industrial HVAC & Utility Systems: Mister Mech Mentor, Vol. 1
Numerical Simulation of an Air Sparging Field Test
Subsurface Fluid-Flow (Ground-Water and Vadose Zone) Modeling