Water hammer transients in a pipe line with an entrapped air pocket are analyzed with three one-dimensional models of varying complexity. The most simple model neglects the influence of gas-liquid interface movement on wave propagation through the liquid region and assumes uniform compression of the entrapped noncondensable gas. In the most complex model, the full two-region wave propagation problem is solved for adjoining gas and liquid regions with time varying domains. An intermediate model which allows for time variation of the liquid domain, but assumes uniform gas compression, is also considered. Calculations are carried out for a wide range of initial system pressure ranging from 0.101 MPa (14.7 psia) to 6.89 MPa (1000 psia). A step increase in pressure equal to 5 times the initial system pressure is imposed at the pipe inlet and the pressure response of the system is investigated. Results show that time variation of the liquid domain and nonuniform gas compression can be neglected for initial air volumes comprising 5% or less of the initial pipe volume. The uniform compression model with time-varying liquid domain captures all of the essential features predicted by the full two-region model for the entire range of pressure and initial gas volume considered in the study, and it is the recommended model for analysis of waterhammer in pipe lines with entrapped air.

1.
Martin, C. S., and Wiggert, D. C., 1989, “Hydraulic Transients in Cooling-Water Systems,” EPRI GS-6427, Electric Power Research Institute, June.
2.
Martin, C. S., 1976, “Entrapped Air in Pipelines,” Second BHRA International conference on pressure surges, The City University, London, Sept. 22–24, Paper F2.
3.
Wylie, E. B., and Streeter, V. L., 1978, Fluid Transients, McGraw-Hill, New York.
4.
Moody, F. J., 1990, Introduction to Unsteady Thermofluid Mechanics, Wiley, New York.
5.
Qiu D. Q., and Burrows R., 1996, “Prediction of Pressure Transients with Entrapped Air in a Pipeline,” Seventh International Conference on Pressure Surges, BHR Group, Harrogate, England, Apr., Paper 251–263.
6.
Lee N. H., and Martin, C. S., 1999, “Experimental and Analytical Investigation of Entrapped Air in a Horizontal Pipe,” Proceedings of the 3rd ASME/JSME Joint Fluids Engineering Conference, July 18–23, San Francisco, CA.
7.
Brinckman
,
K. W.
, and
Chaiko
,
M. A.
,
2001
, “
Assessment of TRAC-BF1 for Waterhammer Calculations with Entrapped Air
,”
J. Nucl. Sci. Technol.
,
133
, No. 1, Jan., pp.
133
139
.
8.
Guarga, R., Acosta, A., and Lorenzo, E., 1996, “Dynamic Compression of Entrapped Air Pockets by Elastic Water Columns,” Hydraulic Machinery and Cavitation, pp. 710–719, E. Cabrera et al. eds., Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.
9.
Cabrera
,
E.
,
Abreu
,
J.
,
Pe´rez
,
R.
, and
Vela
,
A.
,
1992
, “
Influence of Liquid Length Variation in Hydraulic Transients
,”
J. Hydraul. Eng.
,
118
, No. 12, Dec., pp.
1639
1650
.
10.
Hashimot
,
K.
,
Imaed
,
M.
, and
Osayam
,
A.
,
1988
, “
Transients of Fluid Lines Containing an Air Pocket or Liquid Column
,”
Journal of Fluid Control
,
18
, No. 4, June, pp.
38
54
.
11.
Borkowski, J. A., and Wade, N. L., ed., 1992, TRAC-BF1/MOD1 Models and Correlations, NUREG/CR-4391.
12.
Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., and Flannery, B. P., 1992, Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN: The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd Edition, pp. 508–515, Cambridge University Press.
You do not currently have access to this content.