Analytical and experimental investigations have been conducted to characterize the performance of “short” ejectors. In short ejectors, the core of primary (motive) flow still exists at the mixing duct exit, and nonuniform mixed flow is discharged from the mixing duct. Due to incomplete mixing, short ejector pumping performance is degraded and cannot be predicted by the existing “long” ejector models. The new analytical short ejector model presented in this paper is based on the control volume analysis and jet expansion model. The secondary (entrained) flow velocity and the corresponding shear layer (between the primary and the secondary flows) growth rate variations along the mixing duct are taken into account. In addition, measurements have been made in ejectors with length ratios (LRs) of two and three for an area ratio (AR) of 1.95; and a LR of two for an AR of 3.08. Velocity profiles at the mixing duct inlet and exit, and static pressure distribution along the mixing duct have been measured with pitot probes and pressure taps. All of the tests have been carried out at a Reynolds number of 420,000. Comparison shows that the new ejector model can accurately predict flow characteristics and performance of short ejectors. For all of the test cases, the velocity profiles at the mixing duct inlet and exit are well predicted. Also, both predictions and measurements show pumping enhancement with increasing mixing duct length. The pumping enhancement is due to the increase in the static pressure difference between the mixing duct inlet and atmosphere as the mixing duct is lengthened. Furthermore, both measured and predicted static pressure distributions along the mixing duct show a kink. According to the analysis, the kink occurs when the outer shear layer reaches the mixing duct wall, and the secondary flow velocity decreases along the mixing duct upstream of the kink and increases downstream of the kink. Thus, the new ejector model can accurately predict not only the integral performance but also different mixing regimes in short ejectors.

References

1.
Elbel
,
S.
, and
Hrnjak
,
P.
,
2008
, “
Ejector Refrigeration: An Overview of Historical and Present Developments With Emphasis on Air Conditioning Applications
,”
12th International Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Conference at Purdue
, Paper No. 884.
2.
Eames
,
I. W.
, and
Aphornratana
,
S.
,
1995
, “
A Theoretical and Experimental Study of a Small-Scale Steam Jet Refrigerator
,”
Int. J. Refrig.
,
18
(
6
), pp.
378
386
.10.1016/0140-7007(95)98160-M
3.
Jegal
,
S.
, and
Song
,
S. J.
,
2008
, “
Humidity Effect on the Hydrogen Re-Circulation Ejector Performance
,”
KSME 2008 Fall Annual Meeting
, pp.
2589
2593
.
4.
Bernardi
,
D.
,
Bozzolo
,
M.
,
Marsano
,
F.
,
Tarnowski
,
O.
, and
Agnew
,
G.
,
2005
, “
Ejectors Design in the Rolls-Royce 1 MW Hybrid System
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2005-68085. 10.1115/GT2005-68085
5.
Koutmos
,
P.
, and
Mcguirk
,
J. J.
,
1989
, “
Turbofan Forced Mixer/Nozzle Temperature and Flow Field Modeling
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
,
32
(
6
), pp.
1141
1153
.10.1016/0017-9310(89)90013-6
6.
Folkman
,
C. C.
,
1992
, “
An Advanced Method for Predicting the Performance of Helicopter Propulsion System Ejectors
,”
J. Am. Helicopter Soc.
,
40
(
3
), pp.
73
79
.10.4050/JAHS.40.73
7.
Thompson
,
J.
,
Birk
,
A. M.
, and
Cunningham
,
M.
,
1999
, “
Design of an Infrared Signature Suppressor for the Bell 205 (UH-1H) Helicopter Part I: Aerothermal Design
,”
7th CASI Aerodynamics Symposium
.
8.
Thompson
,
J.
,
Gubbels
,
A. W.
,
Barry
,
B.
, and
Birk
,
A. M.
,
1999
, “
Design of an Infrared Signature Suppressor for the Bell 205 (UH-1H) Helicopter Part II: Engine and Flight Testing
,”
11th CASI Propulsion Symposium
.
9.
Keenan
,
J. H.
, and
Neumann
,
E. P.
,
1942
, “
A Simple Air Ejector
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
,
9
(
2
), pp.
A75
A81
.
10.
Keenan
,
J. H.
,
Neumann
,
E. P.
, and
Lustwerk
,
F.
,
1950
, “
An Investigation of Ejector Design by Analysis and Experiment
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
,
17
, pp.
299
309
.
11.
Kastner
,
K. J.
, and
Spooner
,
J. R.
,
1950
, “
An Investigation of the Performance and Design of the Air Ejector Employing Low-Pressure Air as the Driving Fluid
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng.
,
162
(
1
), pp.
149
166
.10.1243/PIME_PROC_1950_162_021_02
12.
Sokolov
,
M.
, and
Hershgal
,
D.
,
1990
, “
Enhanced Ejector Refrigeration Cycles Powered by Low Grade Heat. Part 2: Design Procedures
,”
Int. J. Refrig.
,
13
(
6
), pp.
357
363
.10.1016/0140-7007(90)90024-Q
13.
Huang
,
B. J.
,
Chang
,
J. M.
,
Wang
,
C. P.
, and
Petrenko
,
V. A.
,
1999
, “
A 1-D Analysis of Ejector Performance
,”
Int. J. Refrig.
,
22
(
5
), pp.
354
364
.10.1016/S0140-7007(99)00004-3
14.
Kim
,
S.
, and
Kwon
,
S.
,
2006
, “
Experimental Determination of Geometric Parameters for an Annular Injection Type Supersonic Ejector
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
128
(
6
), pp.
1164
1171
.10.1115/1.2353264
15.
Liao
,
C.
, and
Best
,
F.
,
2010
, “
Comprehensive Gas Ejector Model
,”
J. Thermophys. Heat Transfer
,
24
(
3
), pp.
516
523
.10.2514/1.46439
16.
Presz
,
W. M.
, and
Greitzer
,
E. M.
,
1988
, “
A Useful Similarity Principle for Jet Engine Exhaust System Performance
,”
AIAA
Paper No. AIAA-88-300110.2514/6.1988-3001.
17.
Quinn
,
B.
,
1976
, “
Ejector Performance at High Temperature and Pressures
,”
J. Aircr.
,
13
(
12
), pp.
948
954
.10.2514/3.44561
18.
Toulmay
,
F.
,
1988
, “
Internal Aerodynamics of Infrared Suppressor for Helicopter Engines
,”
J. Am. Helicopter Soc.
,
33
(
4
), pp.
4
14
.10.4050/JAHS.33.4
19.
Millsaps
,
K. T.
, and
Markowicz
,
J. C.
,
2003
, “
An Improved Preliminary Design Method for Ejectors
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2003-38141. 10.1115/GT2003-38141
20.
Abramovich
,
G. N.
,
1963
,
The Theory of Turbulent Jets
,
MIT Press
,
Cambridge, MA
.
21.
Wygnanski
,
I.
, and
Fiedler
,
H.
,
1969
, “
Some Measurements in the Self-Preserving Jet
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
38
(
3
), pp.
577
612
.10.1017/S0022112069000358
22.
Coleman
,
H. W.
, and
Steele
,
W. G.
,
1989
,
Experimentation and Uncertainty Analysis for Engineers
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
23.
Munk
,
M.
, and
Prim
,
R., C.
,
1947
, “
On the Multiplicity of Steady Gas Flows Having the Same Streamline Pattern
,”
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
,
33
(
5
), pp.
137
141
.10.1073/pnas.33.5.137
24.
McBean
,
S. F.
, and
Birk
,
A. M.
,
2007
, “
Optimizing the Performance of Air–Air Ejectors With Triangular Tabbed Driving Nozzles
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2007-27413. 10.1115/GT2007-27413
25.
Cherry
,
N. J.
,
Hillier
,
R.
, and
Latour
,
M. E. M. P.
,
1984
, “
Unsteady Measurements in a Separated and Reattaching Flow
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
144
, pp.
13
46
.10.1017/S002211208400149X
26.
Ruderich
,
R.
, and
Fernholz
,
H. H.
,
1986
, “
An Experimental Investigation of a Turbulent Shear Flow With Separation, Reverser Flow, and Reattachment
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
163
, pp.
283
322
.10.1017/S0022112086002306
You do not currently have access to this content.