A single-velocity-component phase Doppler particle analyzer is used to survey and measure local variations in drop-size distributions and drop velocities in the nearnozzle region of a practical, contraswirling, prefilming airblast atomizer. The technique of laser sheet imaging is used to obtain global patterns of the spray. All measurements are taken with a constant pressure drop across the atomizer of 5 percent, at ambient air pressures of 1, 6, and 12 bar. The liquid employed is aviation kerosine at flow rates up to 75 g/s. The results show that increasing the air pressure from 1 to 12 bar at a constant air/fuel ratio causes the initial spray cone angle to widen from 70 to 105 deg. Farther downstream the spray volume remains largely unaffected by variations in atomizer operating conditions. However, the radial distribution of fuel within the spray volume is such that increases in fuel flow rate cause a larger proportion of fuel to be contained in the outer regions of the spray. The effect of ambient pressure on the overall Sauter mean diameter is small. This is attributed to the fact that the rapid disintegration of the fuel sheet produced by the contraswirling air streams ensures that the atomization process is dominated by the “prompt” mechanism. For this mode of liquid breakup, theory predicts that mean drop sizes are independent of air pressure.

1.
El-Shanawany
M. S. M. R.
, and
Lefebvre
A. H.
,
1980
, “
Airblast Atomization: The Effects of Linear Scale on Mean Drop Size
,”
J. Energy
, Vol.
4
, No.
4
, pp.
184
189
.
2.
Hebrard, P., Trichet, P., and Bardey, X., 1991, “Experimental Investigation of Two-Phase Flow in the Near Field of an Airblast Atomizer,” Fifth International Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, Gaithersberg, MD, pp. 669–678.
3.
Hebrard, P., Lavergne, G., Beard, P., Donnadille, P., and Trichet, P., 1993, “Modelisation de las Phase Liquide dans les Chambres de Combustion,” AGARD Conference Proceedings 536, pp. 36/1–12.
4.
Jasuja
A. K.
,
1979
, “
Atomization of Crude and Residual Fuel Oils
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR POWER
, Vol.
101
, No.
2
, pp.
250
258
.
5.
Jasuja
A. K.
,
1981
, “
Airblast Atomization of Alternative Liquid Petroleum Fuels Under High Pressure Conditions
,”
ASME Journal of Engineering for Power
, Vol.
103
, pp.
514
518
.
6.
Jasuja, A. K., 1982, “Plain-Jet Airblast Atomization of Alternative Liquid Petroleum Fuels Under High Ambient Air Pressure Conditions,” ASME Paper 82-GT-32.
7.
Jasuja, A. K., and Lefebvre, A. H., 1994, “Influence of Ambient Pressure on Drop Size and Velocity Distributions in Dense Sprays,” Twenty-Fifth Symposium (International) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 345–352.
8.
Lefebvre
A. H.
,
1992
, “
Energy Considerations in Twin-Fluid Atomization
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER
, Vol.
114
, No.
1
, pp.
89
96
.
9.
McDonell, V. G., Seay, J. E., and Samuelsen, G. S., 1994, “Characterization of the Non-Reacting Two-Phase Flow Downstream of an Aero-Engine Combustor Dome Operating at Realistic Conditions,” ASME Paper No. 94-GT-263.
10.
Rizk
N. K.
, and
Lefebvre
A. H.
,
1984
, “
Spray Characteristics of Plain-Jet Airblast Atomizers
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER
, Vol.
106
, pp.
634
638
.
11.
Squire
H. B.
,
1953
, “
Investigation of the Instability of a Moving Sheet
,”
British Journal of Applied Physics
, Vol.
4
, pp.
167
169
.
12.
Wang, H. Y., McDonell, V. G., and Samuelsen, G. S., 1992a, “The Two-Phase Flow Downstream of a Production Engine Combustor Swirl Cup,” Twenty-Fourth Symposium (International) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 1457–1463.
13.
Wang
H. Y.
,
McDonell
V. G.
,
Sowa
W. A.
, and
Samuelsen
G. S.
,
1992
b, “
Scaling of the Two-Phase Flow Downstream of a Gas Turbine Combustor Swirl Cup
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER
, Vol.
115
, pp.
453
460
.
14.
Wang
H. Y.
,
McDonell
V. G.
,
Sowa
W. A.
, and
Samuelsen
G. S.
,
1994
, “
Experimental Study of a Model Gas Turbine Combustor Swirl Cup, Part II: Droplet Dynamics
,”
AIAA Journal of Propulsion and Power
, Vol.
10
, No.
4
, pp.
446
452
.
15.
Wang
H. Y.
,
McDonell
V. G.
, and
Samuelsen
G. S.
,
1995
, “
Influence of Hardware Design on the Flow Field Structures and the Patterns of Droplet Dispersion
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER
, Vol.
117
, pp.
282
289
.
16.
Wigg
L. D.
,
1964
, “
Drop Size Predictions for Twin-Fluid Atomizers
,”
J. Inst. Fuel
, Vol.
27
, pp.
500
505
.
17.
Wynne, A., and Jasuja, A., 1991, “Visualization of Airblast Atomized Spray Structure Under Varying Air Pressure Conditions,” AIAA Paper No. 91-2199.
18.
Zhu, J. Y., Bachalo, E. J., Rudolf, R. C., and Bachalo, W. D., 1993, “Assessments of a Fourier Transform Doppler Signal Analyser (DSA) and Comparisons With a Time-Domain Counter Processor,” 6th ILASS-America.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.