The aerodynamic design of airflow passages in fuel injection systems can be significantly enhanced by the use of CFD analysis. Attempts to improve the efficiency of the fuel nozzle design process by using CFD analyses have generally been unsuccessful in the past due to the difficulties of modeling swirling flow in complex geometries. Some of the issues that have been obstacles to successful and timely analysis of fuel nozzle aerodynamics include grid generation, turbulence models, and definition of boundary conditions. This study attempts to address these obstacles and demonstrate a CFD methodology capable of modeling swirling flow within the internal air passages of fuel nozzles. The CFD code CFD-ACE was used for the analyses. Results of nonreacting analyses and comparison with experimental data are presented for three different fuel nozzles. The three nozzles have distinctly different designs (including axial and radial inflow swirlers) and thus demonstrate the flexibility of the design methodology. Particular emphasis is given to techniques involved in predicting the effective flow area (ACd) of the nozzles. Good agreement between CFD predictions of the ACd (made prior to experiments) and the measured ACd was obtained. Comparisons between predicted and measured velocity profiles also showed good agreement.

1.
Chien
K. Y.
,
1982
, “
Predictions of Channel and Boundary-Layer Flows With Low-Reynolds-Number Turbulence Model
,”
AIAA Journal
, Vol.
20
, pp.
33
38
.
2.
Fuller, E. J., and Smith, C. E., 1994, “CFD Analysis of a Research Gas Turbine Combustor Primary Zone,” Paper No. AIAA-94-2768.
3.
Halpin, J. L., 1993, “Swirl Generation and Recirculation Using Radial Swirl Vanes,” ASME Paper No. 93-GT-169.
4.
Kilik, E., 1976, “The Influence of Swirler Design Parameters on the Aerodynamics of the Downstream Recirculation Region,” Ph.D. Thesis, School of Mechanical Engineering, Cranfield Inst. of Tech., England.
5.
Launder
B. E.
, and
Spalding
D. B.
,
1974
,
Comp. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
, Vol.
3
, p.
269
269
.
6.
Lefebvre, A. H., 1983, Gas Turbine Combustion, Hemisphere Publishing Corp., New York.
7.
Lichtarowicz
A.
,
Duggins
R. K.
, and
Markland
E.
,
1965
, “
Discharge Coefficients for Incompressible Non-cavitating Flow Through Long Orifices
,”
J. Mechanical Engineering Science
, Vol.
7
, No.
2
, pp.
210
219
.
8.
Lilley, D. G., 1985, “Swirling Flows in Typical Combustor Geometries,” Paper No. AIAA-85-0184.
9.
McVey
J. B.
,
Kennedy
J. B.
, and
Russell
S.
,
1989
, “
Application of Advanced Diagnostics to Airblast Injector Flows
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER
, Vol.
111
, pp.
53
62
.
10.
Mongia, H. C., 1994, “Combustion Modeling in Design Process: Applications and Future Direction,” Paper No. AIAA-94-0466.
11.
Rizk, N. K., and Chin, J. S., 1994, “Comprehensive Fuel Nozzle Model,” Paper No. AIAA-94-3278.
12.
Rizk, N. K., 1994, “Model for Research Swirl Atomizers,” Paper No. AIAA-94-2777.
13.
Rizk
N. K.
,
Chin
J. S.
, and
Razdan
M. K.
,
1997
, “
Modeling of Gas Turbine Fuel Nozzle Spray
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER
, Vol.
119
, pp.
34
44
.
14.
Sloan, D. G., Smoot, L. D., and Smith, P. J., 1985, “Modeling of Swirl in Turbulent Flow Systems,” Central and Western States Sections of the Combustion Institute, 1985 Spring Technical Meeting.
15.
Smith, C. E., Graves, C. B., Johnson, B. V., and Roback, R., 1986, “Advanced Fuel Injector Characterization,” Phase I Design Report, U.S. Navy Contract No. N00140-83-C-8899.
16.
Smith
C. E.
,
Fuller
E. J.
,
Crocker
D. S.
,
Mekkes
L. T.
, and
Sheldon
J. C.
,
1995
, “
Dual-Spray Airblast Fuel Nozzle for Advanced Small Gas Turbine Combustors
,”
J. of Propulsion and Power
, Vol.
11
, No.
2
, pp.
244
251
.
17.
Yakhot
V.
,
Orszag
S. A.
,
Thangam
S.
,
Gatski
T. B.
, and
Speziale
C. G.
,
1992
, “
Development of Turbulent Models for Shear Flows by a Double-Expansion Technique
,”
Physics of Fluids
, Vol.
4
, pp.
1510
1520
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.