A surface integral formulation, based on representing a crack as a distribution of force dipoles, has been developed for modeling the propagation of a three-dimensional nonplanar fracture. The minimum strain energy density and maximum circumferential stress theories were used to determine the direction of crack growth. The extension of the fracture surface was based on the Paris law for fatigue. Remeshing of the fracture during growth was accomplished by adding a ring of elements to the existing mesh at the conclusion of each increment of crack growth. This promoted the efficiency of the algorithm by eliminating the need to recalculate the entire coefficient matrix. Use of the surface integral method, coupled with growth criteria, has yielded an accurate model for three-dimensional nonplanar crack growth under mixed mode loading conditions. The study of several penny-shaped precracks under mixed-mode loading conditions produced the expected growth trajectory, and compared favorably to existing two-dimensional, three-dimensional, and experimental results found in the literature.

1.
Blandford
G. E.
,
Ingraffia
A. R.
, and
Liggett
J. A.
, “
Two Dimensional Stress Intensity Factor Computations Using the Boundary Element Method
,”
International Journal of Numerical Engineering
, Vol.
17
,
1981
, pp.
387
404
.
2.
Mi
Y.
, and
Aliabadi
M. H.
, “
Dual Boundary Element Method for Three-Dimensional Crack Growth Analysis
,”
Boundary Element
, Vol.
XV
(
2
),
1993
, pp.
249
260
.
3.
Sham, T. L., “A Unified Finite Element Method for Determining Weight Functions in Two and Three Dimensions,” Department of Mechanical Engineering, Aeronautical Engineering and Mechanics, Rensselear Polytechnic Institute, 1985.
4.
Narendran
V. M.
, and
Cleary
M. P.
, “
Elastic Interaction of Multiple Arbitrary Shaped Cracks in Plane Inhomogeneous Regions
,”
Engineering Fracture Mechanics
, Vol.
19
, No.
3
,
1984
, pp.
481
506
.
5.
Keat, W. D., “Surface Integral and Finite Element Hybrid Method for the Analysis of Three Dimensional Fractures.” PhD Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1989.
6.
Forth, S. C., and Keat, W. D., “Three Dimensional Nonplanar Fracture Model using the Surface Integral Method,” Int. J. of Fracture, in press.
7.
Annigeri, B. S., “Surface Integral Finite Element Hybrid Method for Localized Problems in Continuum Mechanics,” Sc.D. Thesis. Department of Mechanical Engineering, M.I.T., 1984.
8.
Pustejovsky
M. A.
, “
Fatigue Crack Propagation in Titanium Under General In-Plane Loading—I: Experiments; II: Analysis
,”
Engrg. Fract. Mech.
, Vol.
11
,
1979
, pp.
9
15
.
9.
Love, A. E. H., A Treatise on the Mathematical Theory of Elasticity, Dover Publications, New York, 1944.
10.
Selcuk
S.
,
Hurd
D. S.
,
Crouch
S. L.
, and
Gerberich
W. W.
, “
Prediction of Interfacial Crack Path: A Direct Boundary Integral Approach and Experimental Study
,”
Int. J. of Fracture
, Vol.
67
,
1994
, pp.
1
20
.
11.
Erdogan
F.
, and
Sin
G. H.
,
ASME Journal of Basic Engineering
, Vol.
89
,
1963
, pp.
159
525
.
12.
Sih, G. C., Mechanics of Fracture Initiation and Propagation, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991.
13.
Palaniswamy, K., and Knauss, W. G., “On the Problem of Crack Extension in Brittle Solids Under General Loading,” Report SM-74-8, Graduate Aeronautical Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 1972.
14.
Ingraffia, A. R., “Discrete Fracture Propagation in Rock: Laboratory Tests and Finite Element Analysis,” PhD Thesis. University of Colorado, Boulder, 1977.
15.
Hull
D.
, “
The Effect of Mixed Mode I/III on Crack Evolution in Brittle Solids
,”
Int. J. of Fracture
, Vol.
70
,
1995
, pp.
59
79
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.