The paper focusses attention on alternative approaches for treating the coupling between the flow in the annulus supply ducts and the jets which enter combustor primary and dilution zones through air admission ports. Traditionally CFD predictions of combustor flows have modeled this in a very weakly coupled manner, with the port flow conditions being derived from 1D empirical correlations and used as boundary conditions for an internal-flow-only combustor CFD prediction. Recent work by the authors and others has introduced the viewpoint that fully coupled external-annulus–internal-combustor predictions is the way forward. Experimental data is gathered in the present work to quantify the strength of the interaction between annulus and core flows, which ultimately determines the jet characteristics at port exit. These data are then used to illustrate the improvement in the prediction of port exit jet characteristics which is obtained by adopting fully coupled calculations compared to the internal-flow-only approach. As a final demonstration of the importance of a fully coupled approach, isothermal calculations are presented for a single sector generic annular combustor. These show that quite different primary zone flow patterns are obtained from the two approaches, leading to considerable differences in the overall mixing pattern at combustor exit.

1.
Adkins, R. C. and Gueroui, D., 1986, “An Improved Method For Accurate Prediction Of Mass Flows Through Combustor Liner Holes,” ASME Paper 86-GT-149.
2.
Karki, K. C., Oechsle, V. L., and Mongia, H. C., 1990, “A Computational Procedure For Diffuser-Combustor Flow Interaction Analysis,” ASME Paper 90-GT-35.
3.
McGuirk, J. J., and Spencer, A., 1993, “CFD Modeling Of Annulus/Port Flows,” ASME Paper 93-GT-185.
4.
McGuirk, J. J., and Spencer, A., 1995, “Computational Methods For Modelling Port Flows In Gas-Turbine Combustors,” ASME Paper 95-GT-414.
5.
Manners, A. P., 1988, “The Calculation Of The Flows In Gas Turbine combustion Systems,” Ph.D. thesis, University of London.
6.
Bain
,
D. B.
,
Smith
,
C. E.
,
Liscinsky
,
D. S.
, and
Holderman
,
J. D.
,
1999
, “
Flow Coupling Effects in Jet-in-Crossflow Flowfields
,”
J. Propul. Power
,
15
, pp.
10
16
.
7.
Crocker
,
D. S.
,
Nicklaus
,
D.
, and
Smith
,
C. E.
,
1999
, “
CFD Modeling of a Gas Turbine Combustor from Compressor Exit to Turbine Inlet
,”
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
121
, pp.
89
95
.
8.
Spencer, A., 1998, “Gas Turbine Combustor Port Flows,” Ph.D. thesis, Loughborough University.
9.
Bicen, A. F., 1981, “Refraction Correction For LDA Measurements in Flows With Curved Optical Boundaries,” Imperial College, Fluids Section, Report FS/81/17.
10.
Launder
,
B. E.
, and
Spalding
,
D. B.
,
1974
, “
The Numerical Computation of Turbulent Flows
,”
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
,
3
, pp.
269
289
.
11.
Patankar
,
S. V.
, and
Spalding
,
D. B.
,
1972
, “
A Calculation Procedure for Heat, Mass and Momentum Transfer in Three-Dimensional Parabolic Flows
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.
,
15
, pp.
1787
1787
.
12.
Ferziger, J. M., and Peric, M., 1996, Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
13.
Thompson, J. F., Warsi, Z. U. A., and Mastin, C. W., 1985, Numerical Grid Generation: Foundations and Applications, North-Holland, New York.
You do not currently have access to this content.