A gas bearing of bump foil type comprises an underlying structure made of one or several strips of corrugated sheet metal covered by a top foil surface. The fluid film pressure needs to be coupled with the behavior of the structure for obtaining the whole bearing characteristics. Unlike in classical elasto-aerodynamic models, a foil bearing (FB) structure has a very particular behavior due to friction interfaces, bump interactions, and nonisotropic stiffness. Some authors have studied this complex behavior with the help of three-dimensional finite element simulations. These simulations evidenced a lack of reliable analytical models that can be easily implemented in a FB prediction code. The models found in the literature tend to overestimate the foil flexibility because most of them do not consider the interactions between bumps that are highly important. The present work then develops a model that describes the FB structure as a multidegree of freedom system of interacting bumps. Each bump includes three degrees of freedom linked with elementary springs. The stiffnesses of these springs are analytically expressed so that the model can be adjusted for any dimensions and material properties. Once the stiffness matrix of the whole FB structure is obtained, the entire static system is solved taking friction into account. Despite its relative simplicity, comparisons with finite elements simulations for various static load distributions and friction coefficients show a good correlation. This analytical model has been integrated into a foil bearing prediction code. The load capacity of a first generation foil bearing was then calculated using this structure model as well as other simplified theoretical approaches. Significant differences were observed, revealing the paramount influence of the structure on the static and dynamic characteristics of the foil bearing. Some experimental investigations of the static stiffness of the structure were also realized for complete foil bearings. The structure reaction force was calculated for a shaft displacement with zero rotation speed, using either the multidegree of freedom model or the usual stiffness formulas. The comparisons between theoretical and experimental results also tend to confirm the importance of taking into account the bump interactions in determining the response of the structure.

1.
Roger Ku
,
C. P.
, and
Heshmat
,
H.
, 1993, “
Compliant Foil Bearing Structural Stiffness Analysis-Part 2: Experimental Investigation
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
0742-4787,
115
, pp.
364
369
.
2.
Heshmat
,
H.
, 1994, “
Advancements in the Performance of Aerodynamic Foil Journal Bearings: High Speed and Load Capability
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
0742-4787,
116
, pp.
287
295
.
3.
Rubio
,
D.
, and
San Andrés
,
L.
, 2004, “
Bump-Type Foil Bearing Structural Stiffness: Experiments and Predictions
,”
Proceedings ASME Turbo Expo
,
Vienna, Austria
, ASME Paper No. GT 2004-53611.
4.
Walowit
,
J. A.
, and
Anno
,
J. N.
, 1975,
Modern Developments in Lubrication Mechanics
,
Applied Science Publishers Ltd
,
London, UK
, Chap. 7.
5.
Heshmat
,
H.
,
Walowit
,
J. A.
, and
Pinkus
,
O.
, 1983, “
Analysis of Gas-Lubricated Foil Journal Bearings
,”
J. Lubr. Technol.
0022-2305,
105
, pp.
647
655
.
6.
Peng
,
Z. C.
, and
Khonsari
,
M. M.
, 2004, “
Hydrodynamic Analysis of Compliant Foil Air Bearings with Compressible Air Flow
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
0742-4787,
126
, pp.
542
546
.
7.
Peng
,
Z. C.
, and
Khonsari
,
M. M.
, 2004, “
On the Limiting Load-Carrying Capacity of Foil Bearings
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
0742-4787,
126
, pp.
817
818
.
8.
Roger Ku
,
C. P.
, and
Heshmat
,
H.
, 1992, “
Compliant Foil Bearing Structural Stiffness Analysis-Part 1: Theoretical Model Including Strip and Variable Bump Foil Geometry
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
0742-4787,
114
, pp.
394
400
.
9.
Carpino
,
M.
,
Medvetz
,
L. A.
, and
Peng
,
J. P.
, 1994, “
Effects of Membrane Stresses in the Prediction of Foil Bearing Performance
,”
STLE Tribol. Trans.
1040-2004,
37
(
1
), pp.
43
50
.
10.
Peng
,
J. P.
, and
Carpino
,
M.
, 1993, “
Calculation of Stiffness and Damping Coefficients for Elastically Supported Gas Foil Bearings
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
0742-4787,
115
, pp.
20
27
.
11.
Peng
,
J. P.
, and
Carpino
,
M.
, 1997, “
Finite Element Approach to the Prediction of Foil Bearing Rotor Dynamic Coefficients
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
0742-4787,
119
, pp.
85
90
.
12.
Carpino
,
M.
, and
Talmage
,
G.
, 2003, “
A Fully Coupled Finite Element Formulation for Elastically Supported Foil Journal Bearings
,”
STLE Tribol. Trans.
1040-2004,
46
(
4
), pp.
560
565
.
13.
Iordanoff
,
I.
, 1999, “
Analysis of an Aerodynamic Compliant Foil Thrust Bearing: Method for a Rapid Design
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
0742-4787
121
, pp.
816
822
.
14.
Heshmat
,
C. A.
,
Xu
,
D.
, and
Heshmat
,
H.
, 2000, “
Analysis of Gas Lubricated Foil Thrust Bearings using Coupled Finite Element and Finite Difference Methods
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
0742-4787,
122
, pp.
199
204
.
15.
Lee
,
D. H.
,
Kim
,
Y. C.
, and
Kim
,
K. W.
, 2005, “
The Static Performance Analysis of Air Foil Journal Bearings Considering Three-Dimensional Structure of Bump Foil
,”
Proceedings ASME World Tribology Congress
, Washington, DC, ASME Paper No. WTC 2005-63728.
16.
Le Lez
,
S.
,
Arghir
,
M.
, and
Frene
,
J.
, 2007, “
Static and Dynamic Characterization of a Bump-Type Foil Bearing Structure
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
0742-4787,
129
, pp.
75
83
.
17.
Timoshenko
,
S.
, 1954,
Résistance des Matériaux II: Théorie Développée et Problèmes
,
Librairie Polytechnique Ch. Béranger
,
Paris, France
, Chap. 2.
18.
Timoshenko
,
S.
, 1940,
Theory of Plates and Shells
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
.
19.
Tong
,
K. N.
, 1960,
Theory of Mechanical Vibrations
,
Wiley
,
New York
, Chap. 2 & 3.
20.
Arghir
,
M.
,
Le Lez
,
S.
, and
Frene
,
J.
, 2006, “
Finite Volume Solution of the Compressible Reynolds Equation: Linear and Non-Linear Analysis of Gas Bearing
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part J: J. Eng. Tribol.
1350-6501,
220
, pp.
617
627
.
21.
Kim
,
T. H.
, and San
Andres
,
L.
, 2005, “
Heavily Loaded Gas Foil Bearings: a Model Anchored to Test Data
,”
Proceedings ASME Turbo Expo
, Reno-Tahoe, NV, ASME Paper No. GT 2005–68486.
22.
San Andres
,
L.
, and
Kim
,
T. H.
, 2005, “
Gas Foil Bearings: Limits for High-Speed Operation
,”
Proceedins ASME World Tribology Congress
,
Washington, DC
, ASME Paper No. WTC 2005–63398.
23.
DellaCorte
,
C.
, and
Valco
,
M. J.
, 2000, “
Load Capacity Estimation of Foil Air Journal Bearings for Oil-Free Turbomachinery Applications
,”
STLE Tribol. Trans.
1040-2004,
43
(
4
), pp.
795
801
.
24.
Radil
,
K.
,
Howard
,
S.
, and
Dykas
,
B.
, 2002, “
The Role of Radial Clearance on the Performance of Foil Air Bearings
,”
Proceedings STLE/ASME International Joint Tribology Conference
, Cancun, Mexico, STLE/ASME Paper No. 2002-TRIB-101.
You do not currently have access to this content.